Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Leesley v. Westgreen2 sentences2000Leesley , 165 Ill. 2000Leesley, 165 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters Groupgreen2 sentences2000See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co:, 182 Ill. 2d at 245-46 , 695 N.E.2d at 851 ; Pekin Insurance Co., 305 Ill. 2000See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co:, 182 Ill. 2d at 245-46 , 695 N.E.2d at 851 ; Pekin Insurance Co., 305 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Messina v. MIDWAY CHEVROLET CO.
green
2 sentences2011Once an individual pays for an automobile, he or she becomes the owner, and, at least under the Policy at issue here, there would clearly be no coverage.” Messina, 209 P.3d at 151 . ¶ 37 An interpretation that renders a provision meaningless is not reasonable. 2011Once an individual pays for an automobile, he or she becomes the owner, and, at least under the Policy at issue here, there would clearly be no coverage." Messina, 209 P.3d at 151 . ¶ 37 An interpretation that renders a provision meaningless is not reasonable. | 2 | 2011–2011 |
John Deere Insurance v. Allstate Insurance
green
2 sentences2000John Deere Insurance Co., 298 Ill.App.3d at 377-379 , 232 Ill.Dec. 544 , 698 N.E.2d at 639-640 . 2000John Deere Insurance Co., 298 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Pekin Insurance v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences2000See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 182 Ill.2d at 245-246 , 231 Ill.Dec. 75 , 695 N.E.2d at 851 ; Pekin Insurance Co., 305 Ill.App.3d at 421 , 238 Ill.Dec. 566 , 711 N.E.2d at 1230 . 2000See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co:, 182 Ill. 2d at 245-46 , 695 N.E.2d at 851 ; Pekin Insurance Co., 305 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Schryver v. Eriksen
green
1 sentence1996In Schryver v. Eriksen, 255 Ill. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Case Foundation Co.
green
1 sentence1983In Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Case Foundation Co. (1973), 10 Ill. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.
green
1 sentence1976Ed. 2d 477 , 95 S. Ct. 449 , the court did not find State action where a State-regulated utility terminated service to a customer without affording the customer a hearing prior to the termination. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Alvin Lucas, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company, a Wisconsin Public Utility Company
green
1 sentence1976(For a similar holding see Lucas v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 466 F.2d 638 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1114 (1972).) In Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 (1974), the court held that there is no State action within the meaning of our question when a creditor repossesses his debtor’s auto pursuant to statutory authority, though the State regulates retail installment sales contracts, licenses repossessors and clears title for repossessed vehicles for the benefit of creditors. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
cluster 317145
green
1 sentence1976(For a similar holding see Lucas v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 466 F.2d 638 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1114 (1972).) In Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 (1974), the court held that there is no State action within the meaning of our question when a creditor repossesses his debtor’s auto pursuant to statutory authority, though the State regulates retail installment sales contracts, licenses repossessors and clears title for repossessed vehicles for the benefit of creditors. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Beech v. Melancon
green
1 sentence1976(For a similar holding see Lucas v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 466 F.2d 638 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1114 (1972).) In Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 (1974), the court held that there is no State action within the meaning of our question when a creditor repossesses his debtor’s auto pursuant to statutory authority, though the State regulates retail installment sales contracts, licenses repossessors and clears title for repossessed vehicles for the benefit of creditors. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Adams v. Southern California First National Bank
green
1 sentence1976(For a similar holding see Lucas v. Wisconsin Electric Power Co., 466 F.2d 638 (7th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1114 (1972).) In Adams v. Southern California First National Bank, 492 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1006 (1974), the court held that there is no State action within the meaning of our question when a creditor repossesses his debtor’s auto pursuant to statutory authority, though the State regulates retail installment sales contracts, licenses repossessors and clears title for repossessed vehicles for the benefit of creditors. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.