Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Schorsch v. Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Mazda, Inc.green2 sentences2002See Schorsch v. Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Mazda, Inc., 286 Ill. 2002See Schorsch v. Fireside Chrysler-Plymouth, Mazda, Inc. , 286 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
S. P. Growers Ass'n v. Rodriguezgreen2 sentences1978(See, e.g., S. P. Growers Association v. Rodriguez, 17 Cal. 3d 719 , 552 P.2d 721 , 131 Cal. Rptr. 761, 763 (1976); see also Schweiger v. Superior Court of Alameda County, 3 Cal. 3d 507 , 476 P.2d 97 , 90 Cal. Rptr. 729, 733 , (1970).) It should be noted that the Edwards and Schweiger cases were concerned with evictions in retaliation for a tenant’s complaint of housing code violations; the protection which those cases extended to tenants is available in Illinois pursuant to statute (Ill. 1978(See, e.g., S. P. Growers Association v. Rodriguez, 17 Cal. 3d 719 , 552 P.2d 721 , 131 Cal. Rptr. 761, 763 (1976); see also Schweiger v. Superior Court of Alameda County, 3 Cal. 3d 507 , 476 P.2d 97 , 90 Cal. Rptr. 729, 733 , (1970).) It should be noted that the Edwards and Schweiger cases were concerned with evictions in retaliation for a tenant’s complaint of housing code violations; the protection which those cases extended to tenants is available in Illinois pursuant to statute (Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Schweiger v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences1978(See, e.g., S. P. Growers Association v. Rodriguez, 17 Cal. 3d 719 , 552 P.2d 721 , 131 Cal. Rptr. 761, 763 (1976); see also Schweiger v. Superior Court of Alameda County, 3 Cal. 3d 507 , 476 P.2d 97 , 90 Cal. Rptr. 729, 733 , (1970).) It should be noted that the Edwards and Schweiger cases were concerned with evictions in retaliation for a tenant’s complaint of housing code violations; the protection which those cases extended to tenants is available in Illinois pursuant to statute (Ill. 1978(See, e.g., S. P. Growers Association v. Rodriguez, 17 Cal. 3d 719 , 552 P.2d 721 , 131 Cal. Rptr. 761, 763 (1976); see also Schweiger v. Superior Court of Alameda County, 3 Cal. 3d 507 , 476 P.2d 97 , 90 Cal. Rptr. 729, 733 , (1970).) It should be noted that the Edwards and Schweiger cases were concerned with evictions in retaliation for a tenant’s complaint of housing code violations; the protection which those cases extended to tenants is available in Illinois pursuant to statute (Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences2000To do so would create an intolerable burden upon the attorney-client privilege, making it very difficult for the parties to the relationship to openly discuss matters which might eventually lead to litigation.” Miller, 111 Cal. App. 3d at 394-95 , 168 Cal. Rptr. at 591 . 2000To do so would create an intolerable burden upon the attorney-client privilege, making it very difficult for the parties to the relationship to openly discuss matters which might eventually lead to litigation.” Miller, 111 Cal. App. 3d at 394-95 , 168 Cal. Rptr. at 591 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
First Lien Co. v. Markle
green
2 sentences1984(First Lien Co. v. Markle (1964), 31 Ill. 2d 431 , 202 N.E.2d 26 .) The Objection 1 served as a nonstatutory defense for the 1969 application for judgment. 1984(First Lien Co. v. Markle (1964), 31 Ill. 2d 431 , 202 N.E.2d 26 .) The Objection 1 served as a nonstatutory defense for the 1969 application for judgment. | 2 | 1984–1984 |
In re Marriage of Chapa
green
1 sentence2024Chapa IV, 2022 IL App (2d) 210772, ¶¶ 44-46 . ¶ 53 It is Nancy’s position that the circuit court erred in its January 23, 2023, order by including the identical nonstatutory factors, rebuked by the Second District, and thereby impermissibly considering them in denying her petition. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Adams
green
2 sentences1986Defendants’ citation of People v. Adams (1983), 116 Ill. 1986Defendants' citation of People v. Adams (1983), 116 Ill. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.