Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Mooregreen2 sentences2014Moore, 207 Ill. 2d at 79 . ¶ 121 The record establishes that the trial court considered Short's claim and found it lacked merit. 2014Moore, 207 Ill. 2d at 79 . ¶ 121 The record establishes that the trial court considered Short's claim and found it lacked merit. | 3 | 3 |
Brucker v. Mercolagreen1 sentence2012Brucker v. Mercola, 227 Ill. 2d 502, 513 (2007). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Eisenberg
green
2 sentences2006Kulkarni commented that, in the present case, Kulkarni did not know whether "at the time [defendant] entered into this plea for aggravated battery * * * [defendant] did know whether or not he was extended term eligible." At a short hearing on April 1, 2005, Kulkarni and Combs agreed that, under People v. Eisenberg, 109 Ill.App.3d 98 , 64 Ill.Dec. 707 , 440 N.E.2d 259 (1982), defendant could not receive an extended-term sentence if he had not been admonished before pleading guilty that extended-term sentencing was possible. 2006Kulkarni commented that, in the present case, Kulkarni did not know whether “at the time [defendant] entered into this plea for aggravated battery *** [defendant] did know whether or not he was extended term eligible.” At a short hearing on April 1, 2005, Kulkarni and Combs agreed that, under People v. Eisenberg, 109 Ill. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
People v. Florzak
green
1 sentence2024After a short hearing on March 16, 2023, the trial court granted the motion to strike. -2- 2024 IL App (2d) 230196 ¶7 The court then immediately proceeded to a hearing on defendant’s petition to expunge. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
People v. Jackson
green
1 sentence2019Id. ¶ 90 Applying these principles here, we cannot say that counsel had any basis for objecting to the very short inquiry initiated by the trial court. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
People v. R.S.
green
2 sentences1990(See People v. R.S. (1984), 104 Ill. 2d 1 , 470 N.E.2d 297 .) However, section 5—14(b)(2) of the Act indicates that when a short hearing date is required because of the minor being in detention, the only parent who need be served is a custodial parent. 1990(See People v. R.S. (1984), 104 Ill. 2d 1 , 470 N.E.2d 297 .) However, section 5—14(b)(2) of the Act indicates that when a short hearing date is required because of the minor being in detention, the only parent who need be served is a custodial parent. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.