Bryant rule in Indiana

9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

Case	Followed	Cited
Evans v. Stategreen ind · 2000 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2004–2013 2 sentences 2013See Evans v. State, 727 N.E.2d 1072, 1080 (Ind.2000) (determining that the trial court’s admission of Evans’ act of strangulation was admissible under Rule 404(b) in Evans’ attempted murder prosecution because Evans had claimed self defense, and Evans’ act of strangulation rebutted his claim that the attempted murder victim was the aggressor). 2004See Evans v. State, 727 N.E.2d 1072, 1080 (Ind.2000) (recognizing that evidence of a defendant's prior bad acts is relevant to directly rebut the defendant's claim that another person was the initial aggressor).	2	2
State v. Mohlergreen indctapp · 1997 · cited in 3 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998In State v. Mohler, 679 N.E.2d 170 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), this court decided that the Bryant rule is to be given retroactive effect. 1998In State v. Mohler, 679 N.E.2d 170 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), this court decided that the Bryant rule is to be given retroactive effect.	1	3
Ceaser v. Stategreen indctapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014The purpose of Indiana Code § 35-34-1-4(a)(5) is to “establish facts that aid in a determination of whether an offense has properly been charged against the defendant as a matter of law.” Ceaser v. State, 964 N.E.2d 911, 918 (Ind. Ct. App. 2012), trans. denied. 2014The purpose of Indiana Code § 35-34-l^(a)(5) is to “establish facts that aid in a determination of whether an offense has properly been charged against the defendant as a matter of law.” Ceaser v. State, 964 N.E.2d 911, 918 (Ind.Ct.App.2012), trans. denied.	1	1
Stewart v. Stategreen ind · 1999 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014A previous version of Indiana’s operating a vehicle as an HTV provision did not include the phrase “validly suspended.” Instead, it provided that “[a] person who operates a motor vehicle: (1) while the person’s driving privileges are suspended under this chapter. . .; or (2) in violation of the restrictions imposed under this chapter . . . commits a Class D felony.” See Stewart v. State, 721 N.E.2d 876, 878 (Ind. 1999). 2014A previous version of Indiana’s operating a vehicle as an HTV provision did not include the phrase “validly suspended.” Instead, it provided that “[a] person who operates a motor vehicle: (1) while the person’s driving privileges are suspended under this chapter ...; or (2) in violation of the restrictions imposed under this chapter ... commits a Class D felony.” See Stewart v. State, 721 N.E.2d 876, 878 (Ind.1999).	1	1
Lafayette v. Stategreen ind · 2009 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 1 sentence 2012Subsequent to the foregoing line of cases, our Indiana Supreme Court reaffirmed the Wickizer “view that an expansive reading of the intent exception would be inconsistent to the principal thrust of [Rule 404(b) ] itself.” Lafayette v. State, 917 N.E.2d 660, 663 (Ind.2009).	1	1
Timberlake v. Stategreen ind · 2001 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 1 sentence 2012See Timberlake v. State, 753 N.E.2d 591 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (1)

Case	Negative	Cited
Grady v. Corbinred scotus · 1990 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998As authority, the Court of Appeals looked to two federal decisions that also involved the Double Jeopardy Clause. 8 These decisions held that a new double jeopardy rule announced by the Supreme Court in Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 , 110 S.Ct. 2084 , 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990), overruled by United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 , 113 S.Ct. 2849 , 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), was entitled to retroactive application under Penry . 1998As authority, the Court of Appeals looked to two federal decisions that also involved the Double Jeopardy Clause. 8 These decisions held that a new double jeopardy rule announced by the Supreme Court in Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 , 110 S.Ct. 2084 , 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990), overruled by United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 , 113 S.Ct. 2849 , 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), was entitled to retroactive application under Penry .	1	1

Also cited on this issue (15)

Case	Cited	Years
Bryant v. State green indctapp · 2004 1 sentence 2012Although it found that Bryant had failed to show that the exhibits constituted evidence of any prior crime or misconduct, the appellate court observed that “prior misconduct evidence may be admitted to rebut a specific factual claim raised by the defendant” and considered the exhibits, containing reference to the police finding a body in the trunk of a car, relevant “to rebut Bryant’s claim that [his father] murdered Carol.” Id. at 499 .	1	2012–2012
Penry v. Lynaugh red scotus · 1989 2 sentences 1998Mohler does not contend that the Bryant rule falls under either of these exceptions and we hold that it does not. 6 D-2 Daniels also recognized that Penry expanded the first Teague exception set forth in subsection D-l supra to permit retroactive application for new rules “ ‘prohibiting a certain category of punishment for a class of defendants because of their status or offense.’ ” Daniels, 561 N.E.2d at 490 (quoting Penry, 492 U.S. at 330 , 109 S.Ct. at 2952-53 ). 1998Mohler does not contend that the Bryant rule falls under either of these exceptions and we hold that it does not. 6 D-2 Daniels also recognized that Penry expanded the first Teague exception set forth in subsection D-l supra to permit retroactive application for new rules “ ‘prohibiting a certain category of punishment for a class of defendants because of their status or offense.’ ” Daniels, 561 N.E.2d at 490 (quoting Penry, 492 U.S. at 330 , 109 S.Ct. at 2952-53 ).	1	1998–1998
Daniels v. State green ind · 1990 2 sentences 1998Mohler does not contend that the Bryant rule falls under either of these exceptions and we hold that it does not. 6 D-2 Daniels also recognized that Penry expanded the first Teague exception set forth in subsection D-l supra to permit retroactive application for new rules “ ‘prohibiting a certain category of punishment for a class of defendants because of their status or offense.’ ” Daniels, 561 N.E.2d at 490 (quoting Penry, 492 U.S. at 330 , 109 S.Ct. at 2952-53 ). 1998Mohler does not contend that the Bryant rule falls under either of these exceptions and we hold that it does not. 6 D-2 Daniels also recognized that Penry expanded the first Teague exception set forth in subsection D-l supra to permit retroactive application for new rules “ ‘prohibiting a certain category of punishment for a class of defendants because of their status or offense.’ ” Daniels, 561 N.E.2d at 490 (quoting Penry, 492 U.S. at 330 , 109 S.Ct. at 2952-53 ).	1	1998–1998
United States v. Dixon green scotus · 1993 2 sentences 1998As authority, the Court of Appeals looked to two federal decisions that also involved the Double Jeopardy Clause. 8 These decisions held that a new double jeopardy rule announced by the Supreme Court in Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 , 110 S.Ct. 2084 , 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990), overruled by United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 , 113 S.Ct. 2849 , 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), was entitled to retroactive application under Penry . 1998As authority, the Court of Appeals looked to two federal decisions that also involved the Double Jeopardy Clause. 8 These decisions held that a new double jeopardy rule announced by the Supreme Court in Grady v. Corbin, 495 U.S. 508 , 110 S.Ct. 2084 , 109 L.Ed.2d 548 (1990), overruled by United States v. Dixon, 509 U.S. 688 , 113 S.Ct. 2849 , 125 L.Ed.2d 556 (1993), was entitled to retroactive application under Penry .	1	1998–1998
Burdeau v. McDowell green scotus · 1921 2 sentences 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 . 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
United States v. John A. McGuire Edmond G. Blumner and Herbert Perry green ca2 · 1967 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
George Watson v. United States green ca5 · 1968 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
Daniel B. Duran, Antonio Gonzalez Guttierez, and Jose Luis Martinez Cruz v. United States green ca9 · 1969 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
United States v. William Cromer Knox and Charles R. Wilson, A/K/A C. R. Wilson green ca5 · 1972 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
Phillips v. Alabama green scotus · 1968 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
Gray v. United States green scotus · 1968 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
Chisholm v. New York green scotus · 1969 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
Dyal v. United States green scotus · 1972 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
Beck v. Connecticut General Life Insurance green scotus · 1972 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975
International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Northeast Airlines, Inc. green scotus · 1972 1 sentence 1975See: Burdeau v. McDowell (1921), 256 U.S. 465 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1048 , 41 S.Ct. 574 , 13 A.L.R. 1159 ; United States v. Knox (5th Cir., 1972), 458 F.2d 612, 615 , Cert. denied, 409 U.S. 845 , 93 S.Ct. 48 , 34 L.Ed.2d 85 ; Duran v. United States (9th Cir., 1969), 413 F.2d 596, 608 , Cert. denied, 396 U.S. 917 , 24 L.Ed.2d 195 , 90 S.Ct. 239 ; Watson v. United States (5th Cir., 1968), 391 F.2d 927, 928 , Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 985 , 21 L.Ed.2d 446 , 89 S.Ct. 459 ; United States v. McGuire (2d Cir., 1967), 381 F.2d 306, 312-13 , Cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1053 , 19 L.Ed.2d 848 , 88 S.Ct. 800 .	1	1975–1975

Where else courts name it

GA 17 (1997–2026) CA 14 (1926–2024) TX 10 (2005–2025) FL 10 (1979–2016) IN 9 (1975–2014) AL 8 (1998–2011) DC 6 (1982–2024) IL 6 (1974–2025) MA 6 (1994–2000) NY 5 (2015–2025) MI 5 (1988–2021) IA 4 (1981–2015) SC 4 (2004–2022) MS 4 (1985–2023) MT 3 (1976–2021) OH 3 (2004–2020) PA 3 (2020–2021) VA 2 (2002–2020) DE 2 (2014–2025) WA 2 (1994–2020) CT 2 (1997–2010) NV 2 (2019–2019) MO 2 (1997–2024) LA 2 (1992–1994)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check