Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Keaira Browngreen2 sentences2025See Brown, 300 Kan. at 546 . 2020State v. Sanders, 310 Kan. 279 , 294, 445 P.3d 1144 (2019); State v. Brown, 300 Kan. 542, 545-46 , 331 P.3d 781 (2014). | 1 | 2 |
In re D.D.M.green2 sentences2021In re D.D.M., 291 Kan. 883, 893, 896 , 249 P.3d 5 (2011). 2014But the district court’s assessment of the eight statutory factors, which is based upon proved facts, should be reviewed for an abuse of discretion. 291 Kan. at 893 . | 1 | 2 |
Brewer v. Cartergreen2 sentences2019See, e.g., Brewer v. Carter , 218 Cal. App. 4th 1312 , 1314, 1319-20, 160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 853 (2013) (reversing trial court order allowing transfer to Illinois because it was a more convenient forum); Taylor M. v. Superior Court , 106 Cal. App. 4th 97 , 110-11, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 502 (2003) (granting mandamus relief and vacating order based on conclusion the referee abused discretion in ceding jurisdiction to Texas where only one of the eight statutory factors favored the jurisdictional transfer). 2019See, e.g., Brewer v. Carter , 218 Cal. App. 4th 1312 , 1314, 1319-20, 160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 853 (2013) (reversing trial court order allowing transfer to Illinois because it was a more convenient forum); Taylor M. v. Superior Court , 106 Cal. App. 4th 97 , 110-11, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 502 (2003) (granting mandamus relief and vacating order based on conclusion the referee abused discretion in ceding jurisdiction to Texas where only one of the eight statutory factors favored the jurisdictional transfer). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Motley
green
2 sentences1975(See State v. Motley, 199 Kan. 335 , 430 P. 2d 264 .) “When the trial court admitted evidence of this prior crime to prove all eight of the statutory factors of proof without considering how and in what way they might be relevant to prove the crime charged it abused its judicial discretion. 1975(See State v. Motley, 199 Kan. 335 , 430 P. 2d 264 .) “When the trial court admitted evidence of this prior crime to prove all eight of the statutory factors of proof without considering how and in what way they might be relevant to prove the crime charged it abused its judicial discretion. | 2 | 1973–1975 |
State v. Vonachen
green
1 sentence2025See K.S.A. 38- 2347(d); State v. Vonachen, 312 Kan. 451 , 471, 476 P.3d 774 (2020). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Makthepharak v. State
green
1 sentence2022Makthepharak, 298 Kan. at 579-80 ; State v. Hartpence, 30 Kan. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Hartpence
green
1 sentence2022Makthepharak, 298 Kan. at 579-80 ; State v. Hartpence, 30 Kan. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In Re DDM
green
1 sentence2021In re D.D.M., 291 Kan. 883, 893, 896 , 249 P.3d 5 (2011). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Sanders
green
1 sentence2020State v. Sanders, 310 Kan. 279 , 294, 445 P.3d 1144 (2019); State v. Brown, 300 Kan. 542, 545-46 , 331 P.3d 781 (2014). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
TAYLOR M. v. Superior Court
green
2 sentences2019See, e.g., Brewer v. Carter , 218 Cal. App. 4th 1312 , 1314, 1319-20, 160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 853 (2013) (reversing trial court order allowing transfer to Illinois because it was a more convenient forum); Taylor M. v. Superior Court , 106 Cal. App. 4th 97 , 110-11, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 502 (2003) (granting mandamus relief and vacating order based on conclusion the referee abused discretion in ceding jurisdiction to Texas where only one of the eight statutory factors favored the jurisdictional transfer). 2019See, e.g., Brewer v. Carter , 218 Cal. App. 4th 1312 , 1314, 1319-20, 160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 853 (2013) (reversing trial court order allowing transfer to Illinois because it was a more convenient forum); Taylor M. v. Superior Court , 106 Cal. App. 4th 97 , 110-11, 130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 502 (2003) (granting mandamus relief and vacating order based on conclusion the referee abused discretion in ceding jurisdiction to Texas where only one of the eight statutory factors favored the jurisdictional transfer). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2011In State v. Smith, 268 Kan. 222, 246 , 993 P.2d 1213 (1999), this court reversed a juvenile’s stipulation to adult prosecution because the trial court had not considered both the juvenile’s stipulation and evidence of the eight statutory factors. 2011In State v. Smith, 268 Kan. 222, 246 , 993 P.2d 1213 (1999), this court reversed a juvenile’s stipulation to adult prosecution because the trial court had not considered both the juvenile’s stipulation and evidence of the eight statutory factors. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Ellmaker
green
2 sentences2011But in State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1148-50 , 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), this court concluded that it had no jurisdiction to consider adult certification when the juvenile consented to the order and the trial court considered the eight statutory factors before waiving juvenile jurisdiction. 2011But in State v. Ellmaker, 289 Kan. 1132, 1148-50 , 221 P.3d 1105 (2009), this court concluded that it had no jurisdiction to consider adult certification when the juvenile consented to the order and the trial court considered the eight statutory factors before waiving juvenile jurisdiction. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Wright
green
2 sentences1973The evidence is relevant to prove intent and some of the other statutory factors enumerated ( State v. Wright, 194 Kan. 271 , 398 P.2d 339 ). 1973The evidence is relevant to prove intent and some of the other statutory factors enumerated ( State v. Wright, 194 Kan. 271 , 398 P.2d 339 ). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.