correction error in Kentucky

2021Rather, the distinction turns on whether the error “was the deliberate result of judicial reasoning and determination, regardless of whether it was made by the clerk, by counsel, or by the judge.” Buchanan v. West Kentucky Coal Company, Ky., 218 Ky. 259 , 291 S.W. 32, 35 (1927).

2021Rather, the distinction turns on whether the error “was the deliberate result of judicial reasoning and determination, regardless of whether it was made by the clerk, by counsel, or by the judge.” Buchanan v. West Kentucky Coal Company, Ky., 218 Ky. 259 , 291 S.W. 32, 35 (1927).

2021White v. Commonwealth, 32 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Ky.App. 2000) The Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure (RCr) 10.10 provides in relevant part: “Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time on its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders.” As explained in Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 12 S.W.3d 672, 674 (Ky. 2000): [T]he distinction between clerical error and judicial error does not turn on whether the correction of the error results i

2020See Wides v. Wides, 300 Ky. 344 , 188 S.W.2d 471, 473 (1945) (explaining that “unlike clerical errors, judicial errors cannot be corrected at any time, but must be done seasonably, in accordance with statutory or code provisions for the correction of erroneous judgments”). “[T]he distinction between clerical error and judicial error does not turn on whether the correction of the error results in a substantive change in the judgment.” Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 12 S.W.3d 672, 674 (Ky. 2000).

2021White v. Commonwealth, 32 S.W.3d 83, 86 (Ky.App. 2000) The Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure (RCr) 10.10 provides in relevant part: “Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time on its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders.” As explained in Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 12 S.W.3d 672, 674 (Ky. 2000): [T]he distinction between clerical error and judicial error does not turn on whether the correction of the error results i

2020See Wides v. Wides, 300 Ky. 344 , 188 S.W.2d 471, 473 (1945) (explaining that “unlike clerical errors, judicial errors cannot be corrected at any time, but must be done seasonably, in accordance with statutory or code provisions for the correction of erroneous judgments”). “[T]he distinction between clerical error and judicial error does not turn on whether the correction of the error results in a substantive change in the judgment.” Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 12 S.W.3d 672, 674 (Ky. 2000).

2020See Wides v. Wides, 300 Ky. 344 , 188 S.W.2d 471, 473 (1945) (explaining that “unlike clerical errors, judicial errors cannot be corrected at any time, but must be done seasonably, in accordance with statutory or code provisions for the correction of erroneous judgments”). “[T]he distinction between clerical error and judicial error does not turn on whether the correction of the error results in a substantive change in the judgment.” Cardwell v. Commonwealth, 12 S.W.3d 672, 674 (Ky. 2000).

2006Happy Coal Company v. Brashear, Ky., 263 Ky. 257 , 92 S.W.2d 23, 28 (1935) [[Image here]] [T]he distinction between clerical error and judicial error does not turn on whether the correction of the error results in a substantive change in the judgment.

2006Happy Coal Company v. Brashear, Ky., 263 Ky. 257 , 92 S.W.2d 23, 28 (1935) [[Image here]] [T]he distinction between clerical error and judicial error does not turn on whether the correction of the error results in a substantive change in the judgment.

2006“A full correction of that error requires that interest be allowed from the date the erroneous judgment was entered and not from the date judgment was entered on the mandate.” Helton v. Hoskins, 278 Ky. 352 , 128 S.W.2d 732, 733-734 (Ky.1939).

2006“A full correction of that error requires that interest be allowed from the date the erroneous judgment was entered and not from the date judgment was entered on the mandate.” Helton v. Hoskins, 278 Ky. 352 , 128 S.W.2d 732, 733-734 (Ky.1939).