Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Georgegreen2 sentences2018The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Shaw , 06-2467, p.17 (La. 11/27/07), 969 So.2d 1233 , 1243, quoting State v. George , 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 , 267 (1950), discussed the purpose for the enactment of the habitual offender law "as a deterrent and a warning to first offenders and as a protection to society by removing the habitual offender from its midst." The Shaw court, quoting State v. Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8 (La. 3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672 , 677, further provided, "[U]nder this statute the defendant with multiple felony convictions is treated as a recidivist who is to be punished *622 2018The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Shaw , 06-2467, p.17 (La. 11/27/07), 969 So.2d 1233 , 1243, quoting State v. George , 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 , 267 (1950), discussed the purpose for the enactment of the habitual offender law "as a deterrent and a warning to first offenders and as a protection to society by removing the habitual offender from its midst." The Shaw court, quoting State v. Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8 (La. 3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672 , 677, further provided, "[U]nder this statute the defendant with multiple felony convictions is treated as a recidivist who is to be punished *622 | 2 | 6 |
State v. Shawgreen2 sentences2018The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Shaw , 06-2467, p.17 (La. 11/27/07), 969 So.2d 1233 , 1243, quoting State v. George , 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 , 267 (1950), discussed the purpose for the enactment of the habitual offender law "as a deterrent and a warning to first offenders and as a protection to society by removing the habitual offender from its midst." The Shaw court, quoting State v. Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8 (La. 3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672 , 677, further provided, "[U]nder this statute the defendant with multiple felony convictions is treated as a recidivist who is to be punished *622 2018The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Shaw , 06-2467, p.17 (La. 11/27/07), 969 So.2d 1233 , 1243, quoting State v. George , 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 , 267 (1950), discussed the purpose for the enactment of the habitual offender law "as a deterrent and a warning to first offenders and as a protection to society by removing the habitual offender from its midst." The Shaw court, quoting State v. Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8 (La. 3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672 , 677, further provided, "[U]nder this statute the defendant with multiple felony convictions is treated as a recidivist who is to be punished *622 | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2018The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Shaw , 06-2467, p.17 (La. 11/27/07), 969 So.2d 1233 , 1243, quoting State v. George , 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 , 267 (1950), discussed the purpose for the enactment of the habitual offender law "as a deterrent and a warning to first offenders and as a protection to society by removing the habitual offender from its midst." The Shaw court, quoting State v. Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8 (La. 3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672 , 677, further provided, "[U]nder this statute the defendant with multiple felony convictions is treated as a recidivist who is to be punished *622 2018The Louisiana Supreme Court, in State v. Shaw , 06-2467, p.17 (La. 11/27/07), 969 So.2d 1233 , 1243, quoting State v. George , 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 , 267 (1950), discussed the purpose for the enactment of the habitual offender law "as a deterrent and a warning to first offenders and as a protection to society by removing the habitual offender from its midst." The Shaw court, quoting State v. Johnson , 97-1906, p. 8 (La. 3/4/98), 709 So.2d 672 , 677, further provided, "[U]nder this statute the defendant with multiple felony convictions is treated as a recidivist who is to be punished *622 | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Byers v. Hunter
green
2 sentences2009Id.; State v. George, 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 (1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 949 , 71 S.Ct. 528 , 95 L.Ed. 684 (1951). |2As a second felony offender whose predicate conviction was in 1999 for possession of cocaine, a non-violent offense that occurred seven years prior to this offense, Addison’s exposure on the multiple bill for attempted manslaughter was a sentencing range of 10 to 40 years at hard labor without the benefit of probation or suspension of sentence. 2009Id.; State v. George, 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 (1950), cert, denied, 340 U.S. 949 , 71 S.Ct. 528 , 95 L.Ed. 684 (1951). | 2 | 1994–2009 |
Zimmerman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
green
2 sentences2009Id.; State v. George, 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 (1950), cert. denied, 340 U.S. 949 , 71 S.Ct. 528 , 95 L.Ed. 684 (1951). |2As a second felony offender whose predicate conviction was in 1999 for possession of cocaine, a non-violent offense that occurred seven years prior to this offense, Addison’s exposure on the multiple bill for attempted manslaughter was a sentencing range of 10 to 40 years at hard labor without the benefit of probation or suspension of sentence. 2009Id.; State v. George, 218 La. 18 , 48 So.2d 265 (1950), cert, denied, 340 U.S. 949 , 71 S.Ct. 528 , 95 L.Ed. 684 (1951). | 2 | 1994–2009 |
State v. Dorthey
green
1 sentence2000Dorthey, 623 So.2d at 1278 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.