Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vallette v. Toussaintgreen1 sentence1986See Vallette v. Toussaint, 467 So.2d 107 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1985). | 1 | 1 |
Whitener v. Clarkgreen1 sentence1985See Whitener v. Clark, 356 So.2d 1094 (La.App.2d Cir.1978), writ denied, 358 So.2d 638 , 641 (La.1978); McManus v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc., 433 So.2d 854 (La.App.3d Cir.1983); Ducote v. Arnold, 416 So.2d 180 (La.App. 4th Cir.1982), writ denied, 421 So.2d 238 (La.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Whitener v. Clarkgreen1 sentence1985See Whitener v. Clark, 356 So.2d 1094 (La.App.2d Cir.1978), writ denied, 358 So.2d 638 , 641 (La.1978); McManus v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc., 433 So.2d 854 (La.App.3d Cir.1983); Ducote v. Arnold, 416 So.2d 180 (La.App. 4th Cir.1982), writ denied, 421 So.2d 238 (La.1982). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bergeron v. Houma Hosp. Corp.
green
1 sentence2025Corp., 514 So.2d 1192 (La. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Blanchard v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co.
green
1 sentence2001Thus, while peremptory exceptions raising the objections of prescription and no right of action may be raised for the first time in the appellate court, Blanchard v. Southern Pacific Transportation Company, 93-1155, p. 4 (La.App. 1st Cir. 4/8/94), 635 So.2d 742, 744 , Lambert v. Donald G. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Willett v. Premier Bank
green
1 sentence2000In Willett v. Premier Bank, 97-187, pp. 9-10 (La.App. 3 Cir. 6/4/97); 696 So.2d 196, 201 , we stated: Article 2163 clearly states that the plaintiff may demand a remand of the case for trial of the prescription exception. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Crews v. Crews
green
1 sentence1986Additionally, La.C.C.P. art. 2163 provides that "[i]f the ground for the peremptory exception pleaded in the appellate court is prescription, the plaintiff may demand that the case be remanded to the trial court for the trial of the exception." In light of Crews, supra, and the provisions of La.C.C.P. art. 2163, we deem a remand to be proper in this matter. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Ducote v. Arnold
green
1 sentence1985See Whitener v. Clark, 356 So.2d 1094 (La.App.2d Cir.1978), writ denied, 358 So.2d 638 , 641 (La.1978); McManus v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc., 433 So.2d 854 (La.App.3d Cir.1983); Ducote v. Arnold, 416 So.2d 180 (La.App. 4th Cir.1982), writ denied, 421 So.2d 238 (La.1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Ducote v. Arnold
green
1 sentence1985See Whitener v. Clark, 356 So.2d 1094 (La.App.2d Cir.1978), writ denied, 358 So.2d 638 , 641 (La.1978); McManus v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc., 433 So.2d 854 (La.App.3d Cir.1983); Ducote v. Arnold, 416 So.2d 180 (La.App. 4th Cir.1982), writ denied, 421 So.2d 238 (La.1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Amoco Production Co. v. Landry
neutral
1 sentence1985If the ground for the peremptory exception pleaded in the appellate court is prescription, the plaintiff may demand that the case be remanded to the trial court for trial of the exception. [4] See Price v. Huey Childs Builder, Inc., 426 So.2d 398 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied 433 So.2d 164 (La.1983); Henson v. Gonzalez, 326 So.2d 396 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976). [5] Our research indicates that our brethren in the other circuits have indeed granted mental distress and aggravation damages in certain breach of contract cases, but these awards were based on distinctions in these cases from the fac | 1 | 1985–1985 |
McManus v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc.
green
1 sentence1985See Whitener v. Clark, 356 So.2d 1094 (La.App.2d Cir.1978), writ denied, 358 So.2d 638 , 641 (La.1978); McManus v. Galaxy Carpet Mills, Inc., 433 So.2d 854 (La.App.3d Cir.1983); Ducote v. Arnold, 416 So.2d 180 (La.App. 4th Cir.1982), writ denied, 421 So.2d 238 (La.1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Henson v. Gonzalez
green
1 sentence1985If the ground for the peremptory exception pleaded in the appellate court is prescription, the plaintiff may demand that the case be remanded to the trial court for trial of the exception. [4] See Price v. Huey Childs Builder, Inc., 426 So.2d 398 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied 433 So.2d 164 (La.1983); Henson v. Gonzalez, 326 So.2d 396 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976). [5] Our research indicates that our brethren in the other circuits have indeed granted mental distress and aggravation damages in certain breach of contract cases, but these awards were based on distinctions in these cases from the fac | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Price v. Huey Childs Builder, Inc.
green
1 sentence1985If the ground for the peremptory exception pleaded in the appellate court is prescription, the plaintiff may demand that the case be remanded to the trial court for trial of the exception. [4] See Price v. Huey Childs Builder, Inc., 426 So.2d 398 (La.App. 2d Cir.1983), writ denied 433 So.2d 164 (La.1983); Henson v. Gonzalez, 326 So.2d 396 (La.App. 1st Cir.1976). [5] Our research indicates that our brethren in the other circuits have indeed granted mental distress and aggravation damages in certain breach of contract cases, but these awards were based on distinctions in these cases from the fac | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Spell v. Executive Officers, Etc., P. & W. Indus., Inc.
green
1 sentence1980Fanguy v. Duthu, 371 So.2d 1201 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1979); Spell v. Executive Officers, Directors, and/or Shareholders of P & W Industries, Inc., 316 So.2d 474 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1975). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Fanguy v. Duthu
green
1 sentence1980Fanguy v. Duthu, 371 So.2d 1201 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1979); Spell v. Executive Officers, Directors, and/or Shareholders of P & W Industries, Inc., 316 So.2d 474 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1975). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Kenner v. Larrabee
neutral
2 sentences1976"If the ground for the peremptory exception pleaded in the appellate court is prescription, the plaintiff may demand that the case be remanded to the trial court for trial of the exception." See Kenner v. Larrabee, 17 La.App. 602 , 136 So. 916 , on page 917 (1st Cir. 1931), wherein this court stated: "Plaintiff, in his brief, discusses the question of prescription, but, as we find no pleas of any kind presented here or in the lower court, we cannot consider it." In view of the above authorities, we cannot consider the argument of plaintiffs addressing the question of prescription. 1976"If the ground for the peremptory exception pleaded in the appellate court is prescription, the plaintiff may demand that the case be remanded to the trial court for trial of the exception." See Kenner v. Larrabee, 17 La.App. 602 , 136 So. 916 , on page 917 (1st Cir. 1931), wherein this court stated: "Plaintiff, in his brief, discusses the question of prescription, but, as we find no pleas of any kind presented here or in the lower court, we cannot consider it." In view of the above authorities, we cannot consider the argument of plaintiffs addressing the question of prescription. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Turner v. Bucher
green
1 sentence1976If the ground for the peremptory exception pleaded in the appellate court is prescription, the plaintiff may demand that the case be remanded to the trial court for trial of the exception." [3a] Overruled on other grounds in Turner v. Bucher, 308 So.2d 270 (La., 1975). [4] LSA-C.C. art. 2317: "Art. 2317. | 1 | 1976–1976 |