Account information only. It is never shown to the AI client you connect, and it is kept apart from your research — which is not logged at all.
Your token is the key to the MCP: claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode take it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. It is also in your welcome email. Install instructions.
No token yet. One token per address, shown once and mailed to you with setup steps — claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode need it in the URL; Claude Code and the rest take it as a bearer header. Install instructions.
Your MCP token. Anyone holding it can search on your subscription, so keep it off shared screens.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
The dedicated fast index: searches run on a machine nobody else queues for, with full-text highlighted excerpts. Higher MCP limits, and semantic search when it lands.
See ProThank you.
Manage billingDelete my account: email [email protected] and it is done by hand, usually the same day. (Self-serve deletion is not built yet.)
Free, and it takes a minute. Registered visitors skip the Cloudflare checks, and your MCP token for Claude or ChatGPT is issued at the end of this.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
Here is your MCP token. It is shown once — it is also in the welcome email we just sent you, with setup steps.
Header form (recommended) — this endpoint, with
Authorization: Bearer <your token>.
URL form — for claude.ai custom connectors and ChatGPT developer mode, which cannot set a header. The whole credential is in the address:
That address already had a token, so we did not issue a second one — two live credentials for one mailbox is how people end up with a working laptop and a broken office machine. Your connector URL is in your inbox under “Your Syfert legal research connector URL”; if it is gone, call 904-383-7448.
9 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Motor Vehicle Administration v. Shradergreen2 sentences2006Applying the balancing test of Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , to the case sub judice, we first observe that the State of Maryland has a “compelling interest in controlling and preventing drunk driving.” Rowe, 363 Md. at 442 , 769 A.2d 879 ; see also Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939 (1991) (explaining that “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws ... is ‘to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace’ ”). 2006Applying the balancing test of Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , to the case sub judice, we first observe that the State of Maryland has a “compelling interest in controlling and preventing drunk driving.” Rowe, 363 Md. at 442 , 769 A.2d 879 ; see also Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939 (1991) (explaining that “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws ... is ‘to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace’ ”). | 4 | 5 |
Willis v. Stategreen2 sentences1995The dual nature of such pronouncements is amply demonstrated by Willis v. State, 302 Md. 363 , 488 A.2d 171 (1985), where we noted that the General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws was “to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace." Id. at 369-70 , 488 A.2d 171 . 1995The dual nature of such pronouncements is amply demonstrated by Willis v. State, 302 Md. 363 , 488 A.2d 171 (1985), where we noted that the General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws was “to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace." Id. at 369-70 , 488 A.2d 171 . | 3 | 7 |
Motor Vehicle Administration v. Richardsgreen2 sentences2013As this Court has previously explained, “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws ... is to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace.” Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Richards, 356 Md. 356, 372-73 , 739 A.2d 58, 67-68 (1999) (alterations in original) (citation and quotation marks omitted). 2013As this Court has previously explained, “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws ... is to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace.” Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Richards, 356 Md. 356, 372-73 , 739 A.2d 58, 67-68 (1999) (alterations in original) (citation and quotation marks omitted). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Moongreen2 sentences2001These measures, some of which are decades old, are primarily designed to enhance the ability of prosecutors to deal effectively with the drunk driver problem.’ ”) (quoting Willis v. State, 302 Md. 363, 369-70 , 488 A.2d 171, 175 (1985)) (Cole, J.); State v. Moon, 291 Md. 463, 485 , 436 A.2d 420, 431 (1981) (Eldridge and Davidson, JJ., dissenting) (mentioning the “societal interest in successful prosecution of drunk drivers”). 2001These measures, some of which are decades old, are primarily designed to enhance the ability of prosecutors to deal effectively with the drunk driver problem.’ ”) (quoting Willis v. State, 302 Md. 363, 369-70 , 488 A.2d 171, 175 (1985)) (Cole, J.); State v. Moon, 291 Md. 463, 485 , 436 A.2d 420, 431 (1981) (Eldridge and Davidson, JJ., dissenting) (mentioning the “societal interest in successful prosecution of drunk drivers”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2006Applying the balancing test of Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , to the case sub judice, we first observe that the State of Maryland has a “compelling interest in controlling and preventing drunk driving.” Rowe, 363 Md. at 442 , 769 A.2d 879 ; see also Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939 (1991) (explaining that “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws ... is ‘to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace’ ”). 2006Applying the balancing test of Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , to the case sub judice, we first observe that the State of Maryland has a “compelling interest in controlling and preventing drunk driving.” Rowe, 363 Md. at 442 , 769 A.2d 879 ; see also Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939 (1991) (explaining that “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws ... is ‘to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace’ ”). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Rowe v. State
green
2 sentences2006Applying the balancing test of Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , to the case sub judice, we first observe that the State of Maryland has a “compelling interest in controlling and preventing drunk driving.” Rowe, 363 Md. at 442 , 769 A.2d 879 ; see also Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939 (1991) (explaining that “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws ... is ‘to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace’ ”). 2006Applying the balancing test of Terry, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , to the case sub judice, we first observe that the State of Maryland has a “compelling interest in controlling and preventing drunk driving.” Rowe, 363 Md. at 442 , 769 A.2d 879 ; see also Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939 (1991) (explaining that “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving laws ... is ‘to meet the considerable challenge created by this problem by enacting a series of measures to rid our highways of the drunk driver menace’ ”). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Hare v. Motor Vehicle Administration
green
2 sentences2001See, e.g., Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Richards, 356 Md. 356, 374 , 739 A.2d 58, 68 (1999) (discussing “the administrative goals of the MVA in ridding Maryland roadways of drunk drivers”); Hare v. Motor Vehicle Admin., 326 Md. 296 , 604 A.2d 914 , (1992) (noting “[s]tate’s interest in protecting its citizens from drunk drivers and, as a means of doing so, encouraging suspected drunk drivers to take the test, thus facilitating their prosecution.”); Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939, 943 (1991) (observing “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving law 2001See, e.g., Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Richards, 356 Md. 356, 374 , 739 A.2d 58, 68 (1999) (discussing “the administrative goals of the MVA in ridding Maryland roadways of drunk drivers”); Hare v. Motor Vehicle Admin., 326 Md. 296 , 604 A.2d 914 , (1992) (noting “[s]tate’s interest in protecting its citizens from drunk drivers and, as a means of doing so, encouraging suspected drunk drivers to take the test, thus facilitating their prosecution.”); Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939, 943 (1991) (observing “[t]he General Assembly’s goal in enacting the drunk driving law | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.