Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2009–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Armstrong
green
2 sentences2026Armstrong, 490 Mich at 289-290 . 2025Armstrong, 490 Mich at 289-290 . | 3 | 2024–2026 |
People v. Nix
green
2 sentences2018Nix, 301 Mich App at 207 . 2018Nix, 301 Mich App at 207 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Trakhtenberg
green
2 sentences2018Trakhtenberg, 493 Mich at 51 . 2018Trakhtenberg, 493 Mich at 51 . | 2 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Shaw
green
2 sentences2018People v Shaw, 315 Mich App 668, 674 ; 892 NW2d 15 (2016). 2018People v Shaw, 315 Mich App 668, 674 ; 892 NW2d 15 (2016). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
People v. Jordan
green
1 sentence2016Jordan, 275 Mich App at 667 . -8- II. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
People v. Davenport
green
2 sentences2009The prosecuting attorney’s office employed only two attorneys, McLennan and Steiger, and McLennan prosecuted Davenport in the trial court. *194 In our prior opinion, People v Davenport, 280 Mich App 464, 470-471 ; 760 NW2d 743 (2008), we addressed Davenport’s claim that his trial counsel, Janet Frederick-Wilson, provided ineffective assistance 2 for failing to raise the issue of Steiger’s move to the prosecutor’s office: We affirm the trial court’s ruling that defense counsel’s failure to raise this matter constitutes an objectively unreasonable error. 2009The prosecuting attorney’s office employed only two attorneys, McLennan and Steiger, and McLennan prosecuted Davenport in the trial court. *194 In our prior opinion, People v Davenport, 280 Mich App 464, 470-471 ; 760 NW2d 743 (2008), we addressed Davenport’s claim that his trial counsel, Janet Frederick-Wilson, provided ineffective assistance 2 for failing to raise the issue of Steiger’s move to the prosecutor’s office: We affirm the trial court’s ruling that defense counsel’s failure to raise this matter constitutes an objectively unreasonable error. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.