Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Speicher v. Columbia Township Board of Trusteesgreen2 sentences2017As our Supreme Court explained in Speicher v Columbia Twp Bd of Trustees, 497 Mich 125, 135-136 ; 860 NW2d 51 (2014), The OMA creates a three-tiered enforcement scheme for private litigants: (1) Section 10 of the OMA allows a person to file a civil suit “to challenge the validity of a decision of a public body made in violation of this act.” Subsection (2) specifies when a decision may be invalidated, and Subsection (5) allows a public body to cure the alleged defect by reenacting a disputed decision in conformity with the OMA. 2017As our Supreme Court explained in Speicher v Columbia Twp Bd of Trustees, 497 Mich 125, 135-136 ; 860 NW2d 51 (2014), The OMA creates a three-tiered enforcement scheme for private litigants: (1) Section 10 of the OMA allows a person to file a civil suit “to challenge the validity of a decision of a public body made in violation of this act.” Subsection (2) specifies when a decision may be invalidated, and Subsection (5) allows a public body to cure the alleged defect by reenacting a disputed decision in conformity with the OMA. | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Citizens for a Better Algonac Community Schools v. Algonac Community Schools
green
2 sentences2023Citizens For A Better Algonac Community Sch, 317 Mich App at 179-180 . 2017Notably, § 10 does not provide for an award of attorney fees or costs. (2) If a public body is not complying with the OMA, § 11 allows a person to file a civil suit “to compel compliance or to enjoin further noncompliance with this act.” Subsection (4) provides for an award of court costs and actual attorney fees when three -3- conditions are met: (a) a public body is not complying with the act; (b) a person files “a civil action against the public body for injunctive relief to compel compliance or enjoin further noncompliance with the act”; and (c) the person “succeeds in obtaining relief in | 3 | 2017–2023 |
Speicher v. Columbia Township Board
green
2 sentences2014THE REMEDIES OF THE OMA In Speicher v Columbia Twp Bd of Trustees (On Reconsideration), 303 Mich App 475, 479 ; 843 NW2d 770 (2013), this Court cogently described “three distinct types of relief” available under the OMA: MCL 15.270(1) permits a person to file a civil action to invalidate a decision of a public body made in violation of the act. . . . 2014THE REMEDIES OF THE OMA In Speicher v Columbia Twp Bd of Trustees (On Reconsideration), 303 Mich App 475, 479 ; 843 NW2d 770 (2013), this Court cogently described “three distinct types of relief” available under the OMA: MCL 15.270(1) permits a person to file a civil action to invalidate a decision of a public body made in violation of the act. . . . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Leemreis v. Sherman Township
green
1 sentence2014Notably, § 10 does not provide for an award of attorney fees or costs. (2) If a public body is not complying with the OMA, § 11 allows a person to file a civil suit “to compel compliance or to enjoin further noncompliance with this act.”25 21 MCL 15.263. 22 MCL 15.265. 23 MCL 15.270; MCL 15.271; MCL 15.273. 24 MCL 15.270(1). 25 MCL 15.271(1). 9 Subsection (4) provides for an award of court costs and actual attorney fees when three conditions are met: (a) a public body is not complying with the act; (b) a person files “a civil action against the public body for injunctive relief to compel compl | 1 | 2014–2014 |
City of South Haven v. Van Buren County Board of Commissioners
green
2 sentences2014Notably, § 10 does not provide for an award of attorney fees or costs. (2) If a public body is not complying with the OMA, § 11 allows a person to file a civil suit “to compel compliance or to enjoin further noncompliance with this act.”25 21 MCL 15.263. 22 MCL 15.265. 23 MCL 15.270; MCL 15.271; MCL 15.273. 24 MCL 15.270(1). 25 MCL 15.271(1). 9 Subsection (4) provides for an award of court costs and actual attorney fees when three conditions are met: (a) a public body is not complying with the act; (b) a person files “a civil action against the public body for injunctive relief to compel compl 2014Notably, § 10 does not provide for an award of attorney fees or costs. (2) If a public body is not complying with the OMA, § 11 allows a person to file a civil suit “to compel compliance or to enjoin further noncompliance with this act.”25 21 MCL 15.263. 22 MCL 15.265. 23 MCL 15.270; MCL 15.271; MCL 15.273. 24 MCL 15.270(1). 25 MCL 15.271(1). 9 Subsection (4) provides for an award of court costs and actual attorney fees when three conditions are met: (a) a public body is not complying with the act; (b) a person files “a civil action against the public body for injunctive relief to compel compl | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Leemreis v. SHERMAN TP.
neutral
1 sentence2014Notably, § 10 does not provide for an award of attorney fees or costs. (2) If a public body is not complying with the OMA, § 11 allows a person to file a civil suit “to compel compliance or to enjoin further noncompliance with this act.”25 21 MCL 15.263. 22 MCL 15.265. 23 MCL 15.270; MCL 15.271; MCL 15.273. 24 MCL 15.270(1). 25 MCL 15.271(1). 9 Subsection (4) provides for an award of court costs and actual attorney fees when three conditions are met: (a) a public body is not complying with the act; (b) a person files “a civil action against the public body for injunctive relief to compel compl | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Wilkins v. Gagliardi
green
2 sentences2000Wilkins v Gagliardi, 219 Mich App 260, 275 ; 556 NW2d 171 (1996). 2000Wilkins v Gagliardi, 219 Mich App 260, 275 ; 556 NW2d 171 (1996). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.