Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Michigan opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Phillipsgreen2 sentences2022“Unlike in civil litigation . . . discovery in criminal cases is constrained by the limitations expressly set forth in the reciprocal criminal discovery rule promulgated by our Supreme Court, MCR 6.201.” People v Greenfield (On Reconsideration), 271 Mich App 442, 447 ; 722 NW2d 254 (2006); see also People v Phillips, 468 Mich 583, 588-589 ; 663 NW2d 463 (2003) (holding that MCR 6.201, not MCL 767.94a, “governs discovery in criminal cases”). 2022“Unlike in civil litigation . . . discovery in criminal cases is constrained by the limitations expressly set forth in the reciprocal criminal discovery rule promulgated by our Supreme Court, MCR 6.201.” People v Greenfield (On Reconsideration), 271 Mich App 442, 447 ; 722 NW2d 254 (2006); see also People v Phillips, 468 Mich 583, 588-589 ; 663 NW2d 463 (2003) (holding that MCR 6.201, not MCL 767.94a, “governs discovery in criminal cases”). | 1 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Greenfield
green
2 sentences2022“Unlike in civil litigation . . . discovery in criminal cases is constrained by the limitations expressly set forth in the reciprocal criminal discovery rule promulgated by our Supreme Court, MCR 6.201.” People v Greenfield (On Reconsideration), 271 Mich App 442, 447 ; 722 NW2d 254 (2006); see also People v Phillips, 468 Mich 583, 588-589 ; 663 NW2d 463 (2003) (holding that MCR 6.201, not MCL 767.94a, “governs discovery in criminal cases”). 2021Unlike civil litigation, which primarily only limits discovery by the relevancy of the information sought and its likelihood to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, “discovery in criminal cases is constrained by the limitations expressly set forth in the reciprocal criminal discovery rule promulgated by our Supreme Court, MCR 6.201.” People v Greenfield, 271 Mich App 442, 447 ; 722 NW2d 254 (2006). | 7 | 2014–2026 |
People v. Greenfield
green
2 sentences2022“Unlike in civil litigation . . . discovery in criminal cases is constrained by the limitations expressly set forth in the reciprocal criminal discovery rule promulgated by our Supreme Court, MCR 6.201.” People v Greenfield (On Reconsideration), 271 Mich App 442, 447 ; 722 NW2d 254 (2006); see also People v Phillips, 468 Mich 583, 588-589 ; 663 NW2d 463 (2003) (holding that MCR 6.201, not MCL 767.94a, “governs discovery in criminal cases”). 2021Unlike civil litigation, which primarily only limits discovery by the relevancy of the information sought and its likelihood to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence, “discovery in criminal cases is constrained by the limitations expressly set forth in the reciprocal criminal discovery rule promulgated by our Supreme Court, MCR 6.201.” People v Greenfield, 271 Mich App 442, 447 ; 722 NW2d 254 (2006). | 7 | 2014–2026 |
People v. Freeman
green
2 sentences2018People v Freeman (After Remand), 406 Mich 514, 516 ; 280 NW2d 446 (1979). “[D]iscovery in criminal cases is constrained by the limitations expressly set forth in the reciprocal criminal discovery rule promulgated by our Supreme Court, MCR 6.201.”2 People v Greenfield, 271 Mich App 442, 447 ; 722 NW2d 254 (2006). 2018People v Freeman (After Remand), 406 Mich 514, 516 ; 280 NW2d 446 (1979). “[D]iscovery in criminal cases is constrained by the limitations expressly set forth in the reciprocal criminal discovery rule promulgated by our Supreme Court, MCR 6.201.”2 People v Greenfield, 271 Mich App 442, 447 ; 722 NW2d 254 (2006). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.