Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Twiehaus v. Adolfgreen2 sentences2023Twiehaus v. Adolf, 706 S.W.2d 443, 444 (Mo. banc 1986). 2022Twiehaus v. Adolf, 706 S.W.2d 443, 444 (Mo. banc 1986) (holding that when a defendant is entitled to immunity as a matter of law, "prohibition is an appropriate remedy"). | 3 | 3 |
Groh v. Ballardgreen1 sentence2009See Grok v. Ballard, 965 S.W.2d 872, 874 (Mo.App.1998) (holding that “[a] standard rule of statutory construction is that the express mention of one thing implies the exclusion of another.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Salvucci
green
2 sentences1992In United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547, 2551 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), the Court said: "In Rakas , this Court discarded reliance on concepts of `standing' in determining whether a defendant is entitled to claim the protections of the exclusionary rule. 1992In United States v. Salvucci, 448 U.S. 83 , 100 S.Ct. 2547, 2551 , 65 L.Ed.2d 619 (1980), the Court said: "In Rakas , this Court discarded reliance on concepts of `standing' in determining whether a defendant is entitled to claim the protections of the exclusionary rule. | 3 | 1982–1992 |
Jacobs v. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc.
green
2 sentences1983Jacobs v. Transcontinental & Western Air., 358 Mo. 674 , 216 S.W.2d 523 (Mo.1948). 1983Jacobs v. Transcontinental & Western Air., 358 Mo. 674 , 216 S.W.2d 523 (Mo.1948). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
United States v. Dinitz
green
2 sentences1980United States v. Dinitz, 424 U.S. 600, 611 , 96 S.Ct. 1075, 1081 , 47 L.Ed.2d 267 (1976). 1980United States v. Dinitz, 424 U.S. 600, 611 , 96 S.Ct. 1075, 1081 , 47 L.Ed.2d 267 (1976). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.