Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Rollgreen2 sentences2002A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.”); State v. Roll, 942 S.W.2d 370, 378 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 954 , 118 S.Ct. 378 , 139 L.Ed.2d 295 (1997). 1999A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.” State v. Roll, 942 S.W.2d 370, 378 (Mo. banc 1997) (citing State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 922 (Mo. banc 1994)). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Parkergreen2 sentences1999A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.” State v. Roll, 942 S.W.2d 370, 378 (Mo. banc 1997) (citing State v. Parker, 886 S.W.2d 908, 922 (Mo. banc 1994)). 1997Id. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Middletongreen1 sentence2020A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.” State v. Middleton, 998 S.W.2d 520, 530 (Mo. banc 1999) (citation omitted); see also State v. Derennaux, 535 S.W.3d 395, 403 (Mo. App. S.D. 2017) (“The prosecutor is given even more latitude when responding to issues raised in the defendant’s closing argument. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Derennauxgreen1 sentence2020A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.” State v. Middleton, 998 S.W.2d 520, 530 (Mo. banc 1999) (citation omitted); see also State v. Derennaux, 535 S.W.3d 395, 403 (Mo. App. S.D. 2017) (“The prosecutor is given even more latitude when responding to issues raised in the defendant’s closing argument. | 1 | 1 |
Middleton v. Stategreen1 sentence2005A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.” Middleton v. State, 80 S.W.3d 799, 814 (Mo. banc 2002). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Rapheldgreen1 sentence1981State v. Kirksey, 528 S.W.2d 536, 538 (Mo.App.1975); see, State v. Rapheld, 587 S.W.2d 881, 894 (Mo.App.1979). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kirkseygreen1 sentence1981State v. Kirksey, 528 S.W.2d 536, 538 (Mo.App.1975); see, State v. Rapheld, 587 S.W.2d 881, 894 (Mo.App.1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cortez v. Merit Systems Protection Board
green
1 sentence2002A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.”); State v. Roll, 942 S.W.2d 370, 378 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 954 , 118 S.Ct. 378 , 139 L.Ed.2d 295 (1997). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Schirner v. Wicomico County Planning & Zoning Commission
green
1 sentence2002A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.”); State v. Roll, 942 S.W.2d 370, 378 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 954 , 118 S.Ct. 378 , 139 L.Ed.2d 295 (1997). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Smith v. Missouri
green
1 sentence2002A defendant may not provoke a reply and then assert error.”); State v. Roll, 942 S.W.2d 370, 378 (Mo. banc), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 954 , 118 S.Ct. 378 , 139 L.Ed.2d 295 (1997). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Black v. Kelly
neutral
2 sentences2000Defense counsel “may not provoke a reply and then assert error.” Id. 2000Defense counsel "may not provoke a reply and then assert error." Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Schmidt
green
1 sentence1996Id. | 1 | 1996–1996 |