9 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2001 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Temple v. Stategreen1 sentence1987Miss.R.Evid. 103(a)(1); See Temple v. State, 498 So.2d 379, 381 (Miss. 1986); Baker v. State, 327 So.2d 288, 292 (Miss. 1976) (Contemporaneous objection is necessary to preserve the right to raise an error on appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. Stategreen1 sentence1987Miss.R.Evid. 103(a)(1); See Temple v. State, 498 So.2d 379, 381 (Miss. 1986); Baker v. State, 327 So.2d 288, 292 (Miss. 1976) (Contemporaneous objection is necessary to preserve the right to raise an error on appeal). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Griffin v. Stategreen2 sentences1992But cf. Griffin v. State, 557 So.2d 542, 551-54 (Miss. 1990) (Contemporaneous objection is not needed where defendant has been denied a fundamentally fair *90 trial.) [2] No such objection was made in the case at hand; therefore, absent the denial of a fundamentally fair trial, any error is waived. 1990But cf. Griffin v. State, 557 So.2d 542, 551-54 (Miss. 1990) (Contemporaneous objection is not needed where defendant has been denied a fundamentally fair trial). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lester v. State
green
2 sentences2001Likewise, in Lester v. State, 744 So.2d 757 (Miss.1999), we again found that such instructions constitute reversible error. 1998Likewise, in Lester v. State, 744 So.2d 757 (Miss. 1999), we again found that such instructions constitute reversible error. | 2 | 1998–2001 |
Foster v. State
green
1 sentence2000Foster, 639 So.2d at 1270 . ¶69. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
West Cash & Carry Bldg. Materials v. Palumbo
green
1 sentence1993This Court gives great deference to the trial judge in determining whether prejudice has occurred, stating, "[t]he trial judge whose duty it is to be attuned to the trial as it progresses is in the most advantageous position to correctly rule whether prejudice, or the lack of it, has emanated from the comment of a witness." West Cash & Carry, 371 So.2d at 876 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Sand v. State
green
1 sentence1986Sand v. State, 467 So.2d 907 , 910 (Miss. 1985). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Myers v. State
green
1 sentence1974Myers v. State, 268 So.2d 353 (Miss. 1972). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.