Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hobson v. Stategreen2 sentences2010See Hobson v. State, 730 So.2d 20, 24-25 (¶ 15) (Miss.1998). 2010See Hobson v. State, 730 So.2d 20, 24-25 (¶ 15) (Miss.1998). | 4 | 4 |
McCullough v. Stategreen2 sentences2007"The general rule is that a defendant may not, himself, introduce evidence at trial and then assert on appeal that the admission of the evidence constituted reversible error." Isom v. State, 928 So.2d 840, 849 (¶ 24) (Miss.2006) (quoting McCullough v. State, 750 So.2d 1212, 1215 (¶ 9) (Miss.1999)). 2006Accordingly, Isom may not complain on appeal for an issue that he, himself, raised. "[T]he general rule is that a defendant may not, himself, introduce evidence at trial and then assert on appeal that the admission of the evidence constituted reversible error." McCullough v. State, 750 So.2d 1212, 1215 (Miss.1999); Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280, 289 (Miss. 1992). ¶ 25. | 3 | 3 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2006This Court recently once again discussed the well-familiar standard of review on the issue of admissibility of photographs in Johnson v. State, 908 So.2d 100 (Miss. 2005), and stated that "the admissibility of photographs generally lies within the sound discretion of the trial court; and, absent an abuse of discretion, the court's decision will be upheld on appeal." Id. at 106 (citing Jackson v. State, 784 So.2d 180, 182-83 (Miss.2001); Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1270 (Miss.1996)). 2004This Court recently once again discussed the well-familiar standard of review on the issue of admissibility of photographs in Johnson v. State, 908 So.2d 100 (Miss. 2005), and stated that “the admissibility of photographs generally lies within the sound discretion of the trial court; and, absent an abuse of discretion, the court’s decision will be upheld on appeal.” Id. at 106 (citing Jackson v. State, 784 So.2d 180, 182-83 (Miss. 2001); Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1270 (Miss. 1996)). | 2 | 2 |
Taylor v. Stategreen2 sentences2006This Court recently once again discussed the well-familiar standard of review on the issue of admissibility of photographs in Johnson v. State, 908 So.2d 100 (Miss. 2005), and stated that "the admissibility of photographs generally lies within the sound discretion of the trial court; and, absent an abuse of discretion, the court's decision will be upheld on appeal." Id. at 106 (citing Jackson v. State, 784 So.2d 180, 182-83 (Miss.2001); Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1270 (Miss.1996)). 2004This Court recently once again discussed the well-familiar standard of review on the issue of admissibility of photographs in Johnson v. State, 908 So.2d 100 (Miss. 2005), and stated that “the admissibility of photographs generally lies within the sound discretion of the trial court; and, absent an abuse of discretion, the court’s decision will be upheld on appeal.” Id. at 106 (citing Jackson v. State, 784 So.2d 180, 182-83 (Miss. 2001); Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1270 (Miss. 1996)). | 2 | 2 |
Fleming v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Accordingly, Isom may not complain on appeal for an issue that he, himself, raised. "[T]he general rule is that a defendant may not, himself, introduce evidence at trial and then assert on appeal that the admission of the evidence constituted reversible error." McCullough v. State, 750 So.2d 1212, 1215 (Miss.1999); Fleming v. State, 604 So.2d 280, 289 (Miss. 1992). ¶ 25. 2005Accordingly, Isom may not complain on appeal for an issue that he, himself, raised. “[T]he general rule is that a defendant may not, himself, introduce evidence at trial and then assert on appeal that the admission of the evidence constituted reversible error.” McCullough v. 12 State, 750 So. 2d 1212, 1215 (Miss. 1999); Fleming v. State, 604 So. 2d 280, 289 (Miss. 1992). ¶25. | 2 | 2 |
Isom v. Stategreen1 sentence2007"The general rule is that a defendant may not, himself, introduce evidence at trial and then assert on appeal that the admission of the evidence constituted reversible error." Isom v. State, 928 So.2d 840, 849 (¶ 24) (Miss.2006) (quoting McCullough v. State, 750 So.2d 1212, 1215 (¶ 9) (Miss.1999)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Johnson v. State
green
2 sentences2006This Court recently once again discussed the well-familiar standard of review on the issue of admissibility of photographs in Johnson v. State, 908 So.2d 100 (Miss. 2005), and stated that "the admissibility of photographs generally lies within the sound discretion of the trial court; and, absent an abuse of discretion, the court's decision will be upheld on appeal." Id. at 106 (citing Jackson v. State, 784 So.2d 180, 182-83 (Miss.2001); Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1270 (Miss.1996)). 2006This Court recently once again discussed the well-familiar standard of review on the issue of admissibility of photographs in Johnson v. State, 908 So.2d 100 (Miss. 2005), and stated that "the admissibility of photographs generally lies within the sound discretion of the trial court; and, absent an abuse of discretion, the court's decision will be upheld on appeal." Id. at 106 (citing Jackson v. State, 784 So.2d 180, 182-83 (Miss.2001); Taylor v. State, 672 So.2d 1246, 1270 (Miss.1996)). | 2 | 2004–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.