Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mississippi Bar v. Mathisgreen2 sentences1995MS Bar v. Mathis, 620 So.2d 1213, 1218 (Miss. 1993). 1994Mathis, 620 So.2d at 1219 ; Underwood, 618 So.2d at 67 ; Foote, 517 So.2d at 564 . | 2 | 3 |
Dunaway v. Busbingreen2 sentences1990Dunaway v. Busbin, 498 So.2d 1218 (Miss. 1986). 1989Dunaway v. Busbin, 498 So.2d 1218, 122 (Miss. 1986); Torrence v. Moore, 455 So.2d 778 (Miss. 1984). | 2 | 3 |
Brocato v. Brocatogreen2 sentences2000Brocato v. Brocato, 731 So.2d 1138, 1140 (Miss.1999); Law v. Page, 618 So.2d 96, 101 (Miss.1993); Polk v. Polk, 589 So.2d 123, 129 (Miss.1991); Phillips v. Phillips, 555 So.2d 698, 701 (Miss.1989). 1998Brocato v. Brocato, 731 So.2d 1138, 1140 (Miss. 1999); Law v. Page, 618 So.2d 96, 101 (Miss. 1993); Polk v. Polk, 589 So.2d 123, 129 (Miss. 1991); Phillips v. Phillips, 555 So.2d 698, 701 (Miss. 1989). | 2 | 2 |
Law v. Pagegreen2 sentences2000Brocato v. Brocato, 731 So.2d 1138, 1140 (Miss.1999); Law v. Page, 618 So.2d 96, 101 (Miss.1993); Polk v. Polk, 589 So.2d 123, 129 (Miss.1991); Phillips v. Phillips, 555 So.2d 698, 701 (Miss.1989). 1998Brocato v. Brocato, 731 So.2d 1138, 1140 (Miss. 1999); Law v. Page, 618 So.2d 96, 101 (Miss. 1993); Polk v. Polk, 589 So.2d 123, 129 (Miss. 1991); Phillips v. Phillips, 555 So.2d 698, 701 (Miss. 1989). | 2 | 2 |
Phillips v. Phillipsgreen2 sentences2000Brocato v. Brocato, 731 So.2d 1138, 1140 (Miss.1999); Law v. Page, 618 So.2d 96, 101 (Miss.1993); Polk v. Polk, 589 So.2d 123, 129 (Miss.1991); Phillips v. Phillips, 555 So.2d 698, 701 (Miss.1989). 1998Brocato v. Brocato, 731 So.2d 1138, 1140 (Miss. 1999); Law v. Page, 618 So.2d 96, 101 (Miss. 1993); Polk v. Polk, 589 So.2d 123, 129 (Miss. 1991); Phillips v. Phillips, 555 So.2d 698, 701 (Miss. 1989). | 2 | 2 |
Polk v. Polkgreen2 sentences2000Brocato v. Brocato, 731 So.2d 1138, 1140 (Miss.1999); Law v. Page, 618 So.2d 96, 101 (Miss.1993); Polk v. Polk, 589 So.2d 123, 129 (Miss.1991); Phillips v. Phillips, 555 So.2d 698, 701 (Miss.1989). 1998Brocato v. Brocato, 731 So.2d 1138, 1140 (Miss. 1999); Law v. Page, 618 So.2d 96, 101 (Miss. 1993); Polk v. Polk, 589 So.2d 123, 129 (Miss. 1991); Phillips v. Phillips, 555 So.2d 698, 701 (Miss. 1989). | 2 | 2 |
Tucker v. Tuckergreen1 sentence1989Pace v. Owens, 511 So.2d 489 (Miss. 1987); Tucker v. Tucker, 453 So.2d 1294, 1297 (Miss. 1984). *701 This court's scope of review is limited by the substantial evidence or manifest error rule. | 1 | 1 |
Culbreath v. Johnsongreen1 sentence1987See Dunaway v. Busbin, 498 So.2d 1218, 1221 (Miss. 1986); Wood v. Wood, 495 So.2d 503, 505 (Miss. 1986); Culbreath v. Johnson, 427 So.2d 705, 707-08 (Miss. 1983); Richardson v. Riley, 355 So.2d 667, 668 (Miss. 1978). | 1 | 1 |
Richardson v. Rileygreen1 sentence1987See Dunaway v. Busbin, 498 So.2d 1218, 1221 (Miss. 1986); Wood v. Wood, 495 So.2d 503, 505 (Miss. 1986); Culbreath v. Johnson, 427 So.2d 705, 707-08 (Miss. 1983); Richardson v. Riley, 355 So.2d 667, 668 (Miss. 1978). | 1 | 1 |
Wood v. Woodgreen1 sentence1987See Dunaway v. Busbin, 498 So.2d 1218, 1221 (Miss. 1986); Wood v. Wood, 495 So.2d 503, 505 (Miss. 1986); Culbreath v. Johnson, 427 So.2d 705, 707-08 (Miss. 1983); Richardson v. Riley, 355 So.2d 667, 668 (Miss. 1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Foote v. Mississippi State Bar Ass'n
green
2 sentences1995This Court's review of the evidence is de novo; it sits as a trier of fact and is not bound by a substantial evidence or manifest error rule. [ Mississippi Bar v. ] Mathis, 620 So.2d [1213], at 1219 [(Miss. 1993)]; Underwood, 618 So.2d at 67 [ Mississippi Bar v. ]; Foote, 517 So.2d at 564 . 1994Mathis, 620 So.2d at 1219 ; Underwood, 618 So.2d at 67 ; Foote, 517 So.2d at 564 . | 3 | 1994–1995 |
Underwood v. Mississippi Bar
green
2 sentences1994Mathis, 620 So.2d at 1219 ; Underwood, 618 So.2d at 67 ; Foote, 517 So.2d at 564 . 1994Mississippi Bar v. Mathis, 620 So.2d 1213, 1219 (Miss. 1993); Underwood, 618 So.2d at 67 ; Foote, 517 So.2d at 564 . | 2 | 1994–1994 |
Mathes v. Mississippi Bar
green
1 sentence1995Mathes, 637 So.2d at 846 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Pace v. Owens
green
1 sentence1989Pace v. Owens, 511 So.2d 489 (Miss. 1987); Tucker v. Tucker, 453 So.2d 1294, 1297 (Miss. 1984). *701 This court's scope of review is limited by the substantial evidence or manifest error rule. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Torrence v. Moore
green
1 sentence1989Dunaway v. Busbin, 498 So.2d 1218, 122 (Miss. 1986); Torrence v. Moore, 455 So.2d 778 (Miss. 1984). | 1 | 1989–1989 |