Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1984–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Marshall v. Millergreen2 sentences2017What is relevant is the effect of the actor's conduct on the consuming public." *738 Marshall , 302 N.C. at 548 , 276 S.E.2d at 403 (holding that "good faith is not a defense to an alleged violation of [N.C. 2017What is relevant is the effect of the actor's conduct on the consuming public." *738 Marshall , 302 N.C. at 548 , 276 S.E.2d at 403 (holding that "good faith is not a defense to an alleged violation of [N.C. | 3 | 6 |
Media Network, Inc. v. Long Haymes Carr, Inc.green1 sentence2017Marshall v. Miller, 302 N.C. 539, 548 , 276 S.E.2d 397, 403 (1981) (“If unfairness and deception are gauged by consideration of the effect of the practice on the marketplace, it follows that the intent of the actor is irrelevant.”); Media Network, Inc. v. Long Haymes Carr, Inc., 197 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mechanics & Farmers Bank v. Higgins
green
1 sentence2019Furthermore, "good faith is not a defense to an alleged violation of G.S. 75-1.1." Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Gray v. North Carolina Insurance Underwriting
green
2 sentences2001We note that Hugh Johnston contends that he retained the checks in good faith; however, “[g]ood faith is not a defense to an alleged violation of N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1.” Gray, 352 N.C. 61, 68 , 529 S.E.2d 676, 681 . 2001We note that Hugh Johnston contends that he retained the checks in good faith; however, “[g]ood faith is not a defense to an alleged violation of N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1.” Gray, 352 N.C. 61, 68 , 529 S.E.2d 676, 681 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Mosley & Mosley Builders, Inc. v. Landin Ltd.
green
1 sentence1990Mosley & Mosley Builders, Inc. v. Landin Ltd., 97 N.C. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.