9 New Hampshire opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Hampshire courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Houston v. Lackgreen1 sentence2018See id. | 1 | 1 |
Sylvester J. Morris, 134-720 v. State of Marylandgreen1 sentence2010CRIMINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS 3.01 (1985) (“The State has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not act accidentally; that is, the State must prove that the defendant acted [with the requisite mental state]. ...”); Morris v. State of Md., 715 F.2d 106, 110 (4th Cir. 1983). *633 The defendant contends that the instruction failed to clearly and accurately set forth that it was the State’s burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that what happened on that night was not an accident. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Crosmangreen1 sentence2005State v. Crosman, 125 N.H. 527, 530 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ballgreen2 sentences1995We begin our analysis of this issue under the New Hampshire Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231 , 471 A.2d 347, 350 (1983), citing decisions of the United States Supreme Court only as an aid to our analysis. 1995We begin our analysis of this issue under the New Hampshire Constitution, State v. Ball, 124 N.H. 226, 231 , 471 A.2d 347, 350 (1983), citing decisions of the United States Supreme Court only as an aid to our analysis. | 1 | 1 |
Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co.green2 sentences1992It is well established law in this State that a causal violation of a statutory standard of conduct constitutes legal fault in the same manner as does the causal violation of a common-law standard of due care____” Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 112 N.H. 50, 52 , 289 A.2d 68, 71 (1972). 1992It is well established law in this State that a causal violation of a statutory standard of conduct constitutes legal fault in the same manner as does the causal violation of a common-law standard of due care____” Moulton v. Groveton Papers Co., 112 N.H. 50, 52 , 289 A.2d 68, 71 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
In re Alfred P.green2 sentences1986See In re Alfred P., 126 N.H. 628, 629 , 495 A.2d 1264, 1265 (1985). 1986See In re Alfred P., 126 N.H. 628, 629 , 495 A.2d 1264, 1265 (1985). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mayogreen1 sentence1986See State v. Mayo, 125 N.H. 200 , 480 A.2d 85 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Mattleman v. Bandlergreen1 sentence1986See State v. Mayo, 125 N.H. 200 , 480 A.2d 85 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Hampshire. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Greene
green
1 sentence2001He asserts that under State v. Greene, 137 N.H. 126 (1993), “shard or shards of glass” and “sharp-bladed object” are discrete factual predicates that provide alternative bases for establishing the element of deadly weapon, and that therefore all jurors must agree on which object was used. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Weeks
green
1 sentence2001The defendant contends that this instruction impermissibly amended the indictment because course of conduct is an element of class A felony theft by deception, cf. Weeks, 137 N.H. at 693 , that was not contained in the charge against him. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.