Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Velasquez v. Franzgreen2 sentences2025See Velasquez v. Franz, 123 N.J. 498, 505-06 (1991); see also Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 19 (A.L.I. 1982). 2021The dismissal on that procedural basis is not a determination "on the merits." Velasquez v. Franz, 123 N.J. 498, 505-06 (1991) (explaining that the preclusionary doctrine of res judicata requires, among other things, a final judgment in the earlier action rendered "on the merits"). | 2 | 2 |
Smith v. Red Top Taxicab Corp.green2 sentences2004Cogdell, supra, 116 N.J. at 15 , 560 A.2d at 1172-73 ; Smith v. Redtop Taxicab Corp., 111 N.J.L. 439, 440-41 , 168 A. 796, 797 (E. & A.1933); Mitchell v. Procini, 331 N.J.Super. 445 , 752 A.2d 349 (App.Div. 2000). 2004Cogdell, supra, 116 N.J. at 15 , 560 A.2d at 1172-73 ; Smith v. Redtop Taxicab Corp., 111 N.J.L. 439, 440-41 , 168 A. 796, 797 (E. & A.1933); Mitchell v. Procini, 331 N.J.Super. 445 , 752 A.2d 349 (App.Div. 2000). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Brown
green
2 sentences1994The effect of the doctrine is to preclude a party from withholding from the action for separate and later litigation a constituent component of the controversy even where that component is a separate and independently cognizable cause of action. [ Brown v. Brown, 208 N.J. 1991That doctrine "is a preclusionary principle intended to prevent the fractionalization of litigation by requiring all claims between the same parties arising out of or relating to the same transactional circumstances to be joined in a single action." Brown v. Brown, 208 N.J. | 3 | 1991–1994 |
Cogdell v. Hospital Center at Orange
green
2 sentences2004Cogdell, supra, 116 N.J. at 15 , 560 A.2d at 1172-73 ; Smith v. Redtop Taxicab Corp., 111 N.J.L. 439, 440-41 , 168 A. 796, 797 (E. & A.1933); Mitchell v. Procini, 331 N.J.Super. 445 , 752 A.2d 349 (App.Div. 2000). 2004Cogdell, supra, 116 N.J. at 15 , 560 A.2d at 1172-73 ; Smith v. Redtop Taxicab Corp., 111 N.J.L. 439, 440-41 , 168 A. 796, 797 (E. & A.1933); Mitchell v. Procini, 331 N.J.Super. 445 , 752 A.2d 349 (App.Div. 2000). | 2 | 1991–2004 |
Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield
green
2 sentences2015Although the standard for summary judgment in our state had long been that set forth in the seminal New Jersey decision Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67 , 110 A.2d 24 (1954), our Supreme Court made clear in Brill the active role trial courts should take in considering such motions. 2015Although the standard for summary judgment in our state had long been that set forth in the seminal New Jersey decision Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of Westfield, 17 N.J. 67 , 110 A.2d 24 (1954), our Supreme Court made clear in Brill the active role trial courts should take in considering such motions. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Irish Pub v. Stover
neutral
2 sentences2004In Irish Pub v. Stover, 364 N.J.Super. 351 , 835 A.2d 1257 (App.Div. 2003), the Appellate Division provided a recent example of the inclination of our higher courts to avoid fostering a formulaic application of the preclusionary principle, other than in the most compelling circumstances. 2004In Irish Pub v. Stover, 364 N.J.Super. 351 , 835 A.2d 1257 (App.Div. 2003), the Appellate Division provided a recent example of the inclination of our higher courts to avoid fostering a formulaic application of the preclusionary principle, other than in the most compelling circumstances. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Aikens v. Schmidt
green
2 sentences2004Aikens v. Schmidt, 329 N.J.Super. 335 , 747 A.2d 824 (App.Div.2000). 2004Aikens v. Schmidt, 329 N.J.Super. 335 , 747 A.2d 824 (App.Div.2000). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Mitchell v. Procini
green
2 sentences2004Cogdell, supra, 116 N.J. at 15 , 560 A.2d at 1172-73 ; Smith v. Redtop Taxicab Corp., 111 N.J.L. 439, 440-41 , 168 A. 796, 797 (E. & A.1933); Mitchell v. Procini, 331 N.J.Super. 445 , 752 A.2d 349 (App.Div. 2000). 2004Cogdell, supra, 116 N.J. at 15 , 560 A.2d at 1172-73 ; Smith v. Redtop Taxicab Corp., 111 N.J.L. 439, 440-41 , 168 A. 796, 797 (E. & A.1933); Mitchell v. Procini, 331 N.J.Super. 445 , 752 A.2d 349 (App.Div. 2000). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Prevratil v. Mohr
green
2 sentences1998The public that we serve is entitled to take for *413 granted that when we act to bar meritorious claims we do so cautiously and reluctantly, and proceed only because the administrative goals that we advance are so essential and beneficial to the administration of justice as to warrant the [application] of a preclusionary rule. [ Id. at 214, 678 A. 2d 243 .] I would reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division and remand the case for trial to the Law Division. 1998The public that we serve is entitled to take for granted that when we act to bar meritorious claims we do so cautiously and reluctantly, and proceed only because the administrative goals that we advance are so essential and beneficial to the administration of justice as to warrant the [application] of a preclusionary rule. [ Id. at 214, 678 A.2d 243 .] I would reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division and remand the case for trial to the Law Division. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Cafferata v. Peyser
green
2 sentences1997Cafferata v. Peyser, 251 N.J.Super. 256, 264 , 597 A.2d 1101 (App.Div.1991) (“[tjhese irregularities in counsel’s papers went to the essence of defendants’ preclusionary defense and obfuscated the merits of the issue in the trial court. 1997Cafferata v. Peyser, 251 N.J.Super. 256, 264 , 597 A.2d 1101 (App.Div.1991) (“[tjhese irregularities in counsel’s papers went to the essence of defendants’ preclusionary defense and obfuscated the merits of the issue in the trial court. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.