res judicata provides that a cause doctrine (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

res judicata provides that a cause doctrine in New Jersey

9 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2023 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Velasquez v. Franzgreen
nj · 1991 · cited in 8 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2009–2023
2 sentences

2023"In essence, the doctrine of res judicata provides that a cause of action between parties that has been finally determined on the merits by a tribunal having jurisdiction cannot be relitigated by those parties or their privies in a new proceeding." Ibid.

2022Thus, the judge concluded plaintiff was barred by "the doctrines of res judicata and la[]ches" from requesting "any further . . . relief in this regard." See Velasquez v. Franz, 123 N.J. 498, 505 (1991) ("[T]he doctrine of res judicata provides that a cause of action between parties that has been finally determined on the merits by a tribunal having jurisdiction cannot be relitigated by those parties or their privies in a new proceeding." (citing Roberts v. Goldner, 79 N.J. 82, 85 (1979))); Knorr v. Smeal, 178 N.J. 169, 180-81 (2003) ("[The doctrine of laches] is invoked to deny a party enforc

58
Roberts v. Goldnergreen
nj · 1979 · cited in 5 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1991–2022
2 sentences

2022Thus, the judge concluded plaintiff was barred by "the doctrines of res judicata and la[]ches" from requesting "any further . . . relief in this regard." See Velasquez v. Franz, 123 N.J. 498, 505 (1991) ("[T]he doctrine of res judicata provides that a cause of action between parties that has been finally determined on the merits by a tribunal having jurisdiction cannot be relitigated by those parties or their privies in a new proceeding." (citing Roberts v. Goldner, 79 N.J. 82, 85 (1979))); Knorr v. Smeal, 178 N.J. 169, 180-81 (2003) ("[The doctrine of laches] is invoked to deny a party enforc

2022The court properly rejected Townsend's repeated claims for workers' compensation benefits for the January 29, 2008 bus accident. "[T]he doctrine of res judicata provides that a cause of action between parties that has been finally determined on the merits by a tribunal having jurisdiction cannot be relitigated by those parties or their privies in a new proceeding." Velasquez v. Franz, 123 N.J. 498, 505 (1991) (citing Roberts v. Goldner, 79 N.J. 82, 85 (1979)).

25
Knorr v. Smealgreen
nj · 2003 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022Thus, the judge concluded plaintiff was barred by "the doctrines of res judicata and la[]ches" from requesting "any further . . . relief in this regard." See Velasquez v. Franz, 123 N.J. 498, 505 (1991) ("[T]he doctrine of res judicata provides that a cause of action between parties that has been finally determined on the merits by a tribunal having jurisdiction cannot be relitigated by those parties or their privies in a new proceeding." (citing Roberts v. Goldner, 79 N.J. 82, 85 (1979))); Knorr v. Smeal, 178 N.J. 169, 180-81 (2003) ("[The doctrine of laches] is invoked to deny a party enforc

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check