Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1979–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Capano v. Borough of Stone Harborgreen2 sentences1994Unlike the holding in Capano v. Borough of Stone Harbor, 530 F. Supp. 1254, 1263 (D.N.J. 1982), we do not read Tobin to be limited to situations in which a developer makes false verbal representations about the environment surrounding the premises involved in a particular transaction. 1994Unlike the holding in Capano v. Borough of Stone Harbor, 530 F. Supp. 1254, 1263 (D.N.J. 1982), we do not read Tobin to be limited to situations in which a developer makes false verbal representations about the environment surrounding the premises involved in a particular transaction. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Yengogreen2 sentences1988R. 1:10-2, 4, 5. * * * The rules governing criminal trials apply fully, save only indictment and trial by jury. [Emphasis added.] And in In Re Yengo, 84 N.J. 111, 121 (1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 941 , 67 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), Justice Pollock, fully subscribing to the Weintraub doctrine, noted again that When the contempt is in the presence of the court, the judge may act summarily without notice or order to show cause. 1988R. 1:10-2, 4, 5. * * * The rules governing criminal trials apply fully, save only indictment and trial by jury. [Emphasis added.] And in In Re Yengo, 84 N.J. 111, 121 (1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 941 , 67 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), Justice Pollock, fully subscribing to the Weintraub doctrine, noted again that When the contempt is in the presence of the court, the judge may act summarily without notice or order to show cause. | 1 | 1 |
525 Realty Holding Co. v. Borough of Hasbrouck Heightsgreen1 sentence1982This court has held that there is a strong presumption in favor of the application of chapter 123 in the interest of assess ment stability. 525 Realty Holding Co. v. Hasbrouck Heights, 3 N.J.Tax 206, 216 (Tax Ct. 1981). | 1 | 1 |
Tomkins Tidewater Terminal v. Town of Kearnygreen1 sentence1981In support of the oft-stated proposition that chapter 123 was in large part of legislative response to the problem of proving a discriminatory assessment in cases where Kents relief is sought, Devonshire, supra, at 398 ; see, also, Tomkins Tidewater Terminal Co. v. Kearny, 1 N.J.Tax 590 (Tax Court 1980), a review of the legislative activities predating its adoption is enlightening. . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Barnesgreen1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
State v. De Simonegreen1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
State v. McKnightgreen1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cartergreen1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
State v. McNairgreen1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Graygreen1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Campbellgreen1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Appeals of Kents 2124 Atlantic Ave., Inc.
green
2 sentences1981Chapter 123 relief is not an alternative to the constitutional right to claim discrimination found in Kents, but is an answer to Chief Justice Weintraub’s plea for a legislative response to the dilemma of providing a remedy in “ratio cases.” Kents, 34 N.J. at 33 , 166 A.2d 763 . [Devonshire, supra, at 403 ]. 1981Chapter 123 relief is not an alternative to the constitutional right to claim discrimination found in Kents, but it is an answer to Chief Justice Weintraub’s plea for a legislative response to the dilemma of providing a remedy in “ratio cases.” Kents, 34 N.J. at 33 . | 2 | 1981–1981 |
Alexander v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.
green
2 sentences2011Power & Light Co., 21 N.J. 373, 378 , 122 A. 2d 339 (1956). 2011Power & Light Co., 21 N.J. 373, 378 , 122 A. 2d 339 (1956). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Reilly v. Ozzard
green
2 sentences2000The Court also correctly concludes that the offices are not incompatible under the common law, citing with approval, ante at 501-02, 745 A.2d at 500, Chief Justice Weintraub’s test for common law incompatibility expressed in Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529, 543 , 166 A.2d 360 (1960), as occurring only when “in the established government scheme one office is subordinate to another, or subject to its supervision or control, or the duties clash, inviting the incumbent to prefer one obligation over another.” Nevertheless, the Court concludes that petitioner’s “own interests in vindicating his conduc 2000The Court also correctly concludes that the offices are not incompatible under the common law, citing with approval, ante at 501-02, 745 A.2d at 500, Chief Justice Weintraub’s test for common law incompatibility expressed in Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529, 543 , 166 A.2d 360 (1960), as occurring only when “in the established government scheme one office is subordinate to another, or subject to its supervision or control, or the duties clash, inviting the incumbent to prefer one obligation over another.” Nevertheless, the Court concludes that petitioner’s “own interests in vindicating his conduc | 1 | 2000–2000 |
In Re Advisory Committee on Professional Ethics
green
2 sentences2000Ante at 501, 745 A. 2d at 500 . *503 The Court also correctly concludes that the offices are not incompatible under the common law, citing with approval, ante at 501-02, 745 A. 2d at 500 , Chief Justice Weintraub's test for common law incompatibility expressed in Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529, 543 , 166 A. 2d 360 (1960), as occurring only when "in the established government scheme one office is subordinate to another, or subject to its supervision or control, or the duties clash, inviting the incumbent to prefer one obligation over another." Nevertheless, the Court concludes that petitioner's 2000Ante at 501, 745 A. 2d at 500 . *503 The Court also correctly concludes that the offices are not incompatible under the common law, citing with approval, ante at 501-02, 745 A. 2d at 500 , Chief Justice Weintraub's test for common law incompatibility expressed in Reilly v. Ozzard, 33 N.J. 529, 543 , 166 A. 2d 360 (1960), as occurring only when "in the established government scheme one office is subordinate to another, or subject to its supervision or control, or the duties clash, inviting the incumbent to prefer one obligation over another." Nevertheless, the Court concludes that petitioner's | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Tobin v. Paparone Const. Co.
green
2 sentences1994Relying on the Weintraub doctrine of justice and fair dealing, the court found the developer's "silence was a fraudulent representation and a failure of an implicit condition of sale." Id. at 526 , 349 A. 2d 574 . 1994Relying on the Weintraub doctrine of justice and fair dealing, the court found the developer's "silence was a fraudulent representation and a failure of an implicit condition of sale." Id. at 526 , 349 A. 2d 574 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Badwan v. United States
green
2 sentences1988R. 1:10-2, 4, 5. * * * The rules governing criminal trials apply fully, save only indictment and trial by jury. [Emphasis added.] And in In Re Yengo, 84 N.J. 111, 121 (1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 941 , 67 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), Justice Pollock, fully subscribing to the Weintraub doctrine, noted again that When the contempt is in the presence of the court, the judge may act summarily without notice or order to show cause. 1988R. 1:10-2, 4, 5. * * * The rules governing criminal trials apply fully, save only indictment and trial by jury. [Emphasis added.] And in In Re Yengo, 84 N.J. 111, 121 (1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 941 , 67 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), Justice Pollock, fully subscribing to the Weintraub doctrine, noted again that When the contempt is in the presence of the court, the judge may act summarily without notice or order to show cause. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Schneider v. Arkansas
green
2 sentences1988R. 1:10-2, 4, 5. * * * The rules governing criminal trials apply fully, save only indictment and trial by jury. [Emphasis added.] And in In Re Yengo, 84 N.J. 111, 121 (1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 941 , 67 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), Justice Pollock, fully subscribing to the Weintraub doctrine, noted again that When the contempt is in the presence of the court, the judge may act summarily without notice or order to show cause. 1988R. 1:10-2, 4, 5. * * * The rules governing criminal trials apply fully, save only indictment and trial by jury. [Emphasis added.] And in In Re Yengo, 84 N.J. 111, 121 (1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 941 , 67 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), Justice Pollock, fully subscribing to the Weintraub doctrine, noted again that When the contempt is in the presence of the court, the judge may act summarily without notice or order to show cause. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
In re Yengo
green
2 sentences1988R. 1:10-2, 4, 5. * * * The rules governing criminal trials apply fully, save only indictment and trial by jury. [Emphasis added.] And in In Re Yengo, 84 N.J. 111, 121 (1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 941 , 67 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), Justice Pollock, fully subscribing to the Weintraub doctrine, noted again that When the contempt is in the presence of the court, the judge may act summarily without notice or order to show cause. 1988R. 1:10-2, 4, 5. * * * The rules governing criminal trials apply fully, save only indictment and trial by jury. [Emphasis added.] And in In Re Yengo, 84 N.J. 111, 121 (1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 1124 , 101 S.Ct. 941 , 67 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981), Justice Pollock, fully subscribing to the Weintraub doctrine, noted again that When the contempt is in the presence of the court, the judge may act summarily without notice or order to show cause. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Walter Reade, Inc. v. Township of Dennis
green
2 sentences1985This interpretation is consistent with Justice Weintraub's analysis in Walter Reade, supra . 1985There he found that several provisions of the New Jersey Highway Authority Act showed that the Legislature had "amply provided" for "[t]he power of the Authority to contract for the operation of the restaurant facilities." 36 N.J. at 439 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Devonshire Development Associates v. City of Hackensack
green
1 sentence1982“Chapter 123 relief is not an alternative to the constitutional right to claim discrimination found in Kents, but it is an answer to Chief Justice Weintraub’s plea for a legislative response to the dilemma of providing a remedy in ‘ratio’ cases.” Id. at 403, 184 N.J.Super. 371 , 446 A.2d 201 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Andrews v. United States
green
1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Maloney v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
green
1 sentence1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Chamberlain v. Michigan
green
2 sentences1979State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 324 (1972); State v. McNair, 60 N.J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N.J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N.J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U.S. 948 , 90 S.Ct. 969 , 25 L.Ed. 2d 130 (1970); State v. Barnes, 54 N.J. 1, 10 (1969), cert. den. 396 U.S. 1029 , 90 S.Ct. 580 , 24 L.Ed. 2d 525 (1970); State v. Campbell, 53 N.J. 230, 233 (1969); State v. McKnight, 52 N.J. 35, 58 (1968). 1979State v. De Simone, 60 N. J. 319, 324 ,(1972); State v. McNair, 60 N. J. 8, 12 (1972); State v. Gray, 59 N. J. 563, 567 (1971); State v. Carter, 54 N. J. 436, 448 (1969), cert. den. 397 U. S. 948 , 90 S. Ct. 969 , 25 L. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.