Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 New York opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Lahey v. Kellygreen2 sentences2014Upon judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing, this Court’s function is *785 limited to consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Jennings v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 90 NY2d 227, 239 [1997]; Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 140 [1987]). 2008Upon judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing, this Court’s function is limited to consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 140 [1987]; Matter of Alegre Deli v New York State Liq. | 3 | 4 |
Alegre Deli, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authoritygreen2 sentences2025Auth. , 298 AD2d 581, 582 ; see CPLR 7803[4]). 2017Auth., 298 AD2d 581, 582 [2002]). | 2 | 3 |
Jennings v. MENTAL HEALTH OFFgreen2 sentences2015“Upon judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing, this Court’s function is limited to consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence” (Matter of CVS Albany, LLC v *1091 Facelle, 121 AD3d 784, 784-785 [2014]; see Matter of Jennings v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 90 NY2d 227, 239 [1997]; Matter of Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v Harper, 49 AD3d 735 [2008]). 2014Upon judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing, this Court’s function is *785 limited to consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Jennings v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 90 NY2d 227, 239 [1997]; Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 140 [1987]). | 2 | 2 |
Matter of CVS Albany, LLC v. Facellegreen2 sentences2018"Upon judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing, this Court's function is limited to consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence" ( Matter of CVS Albany, LLC v Facelle , 121 AD3d 784, 784-785 ). 2015“Upon judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing, this Court’s function is limited to consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence” (Matter of CVS Albany, LLC v *1091 Facelle, 121 AD3d 784, 784-785 [2014]; see Matter of Jennings v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 90 NY2d 227, 239 [1997]; Matter of Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v Harper, 49 AD3d 735 [2008]). | 1 | 2 |
Matter of Gresser v. Franklin Sq. & Munson Fire Dept.green2 sentences2025"Substantial evidence means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact" ( Matter of Gresser v Franklin Sq. & Munson Fire Dept. , 179 AD3d at 920 [alteration and internal quotation marks omitted]). 2025"Substantial evidence means such relevant proof as a reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support a conclusion or ultimate fact" ( Matter of Gresser v Franklin Sq. & Munson Fire Dept. , 179 AD3d at 920 [alteration and internal quotation marks omitted]). | 1 | 1 |
S & S Pub, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authoritygreen1 sentence2009Auth., 49 AD3d 654, 654 [2008]; see Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135, 140 [1987]; 300 Gramatan Ave. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Lozada v. Elmont Hook & Ladder Co. No. 1
green
1 sentence2025"Generally, judicial review by this Court of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing is limited to whether it is supported by 'substantial [*2]evidence'" ( Matter of Lozada v Elmont Hook & Ladder Co. No. 1 , 151 AD3d 860, 861 , quoting Matter of Alegre Deli v New York State Liq. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v. Harper
green
1 sentence2015“Upon judicial review of a determination rendered by an administrative body following a hearing, this Court’s function is limited to consideration of whether the determination is supported by substantial evidence” (Matter of CVS Albany, LLC v *1091 Facelle, 121 AD3d 784, 784-785 [2014]; see Matter of Jennings v New York State Off. of Mental Health, 90 NY2d 227, 239 [1997]; Matter of Genovese Drug Stores, Inc. v Harper, 49 AD3d 735 [2008]). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Kelly v. Murphy
green
1 sentence2002Further, a decision by an administrative hearing officer to credit the testimony of a given witness is given great weight because the hearing officer had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of the witness (see Matter of Kelly v Murphy, 20 NY2d 205, 209-210 ; cf Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Berenhaus v. Ward
green
1 sentence2002Further, a decision by an administrative hearing officer to credit the testimony of a given witness is given great weight because the hearing officer had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of the witness (see Matter of Kelly v Murphy, 20 NY2d 205, 209-210 ; cf Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.