Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dennis
green
2 sentences2011State v. Dennis, 79 Ohio St.3d 421, 425 , 1997-Ohio-372 . {¶59} Osman contends that his statements given before the police gave him Miranda warnings tainted subsequent statements he made after he received his Miranda warnings. 2011State v. Dennis, 79 Ohio St.3d 421, 425 , 1997- Ohio-372. {¶56} Abdi contends that the waiver of Miranda rights obtained by Lt. | 5 | 2002–2011 |
State v. Dennis
green
2 sentences2011State v. Dennis, 79 Ohio St.3d 421, 425 , 1997-Ohio-372 . {¶59} Osman contends that his statements given before the police gave him Miranda warnings tainted subsequent statements he made after he received his Miranda warnings. 2010State v. Dennis, 79 Ohio St.3d 421, 425 , 1997-Ohio-372 . {¶13} Humphrey contends that his waiver was ineffective because it was “clear that [Humphrey] had consumed enough alcohol to impair his ability to reason.” Humphrey’s Brief at 9. | 2 | 2010–2011 |
State ex rel. Jackson v. Dallman
green
2 sentences2008Jackson v. Dallman (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 261 . {¶ 30} Although it appears that the defendant signed a written waiver of a jury, and although his counsel made comments interpreted by the trial court and the majority as a confirmation of that waiver, the trial court failed to address the issue to the defendant to determine whether the waiver was being made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. 1997In Dallman, supra, the record established that the defendant signed a written waiver of his right to a jury trial but the form was never filed and never made part of the record in the criminal case. | 2 | 1997–2008 |
State v. Tate
green
1 sentence2009State v. Tate , 59 Ohio St. 2d 50 , syllabus (1979). {¶ 7} The record reflects that on July 18, 2008, 10 days before the date set for trial, Ms. Lecorcik filed a written jury demand with the clerk of the Barberton Municipal Court. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State ex rel. Larkins v. Baker
green
2 sentences2004Larkins v. Baker (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 658 , 653 N.E.2d 701 , the defendant signed a written waiver of a jury trial but it was not filed and made a part of the court’s record. 2004Larkins v. Baker (1995), 73 Ohio St.3d 658 , 653 N.E.2d 701 , the defendant signed a written waiver of a jury trial but it was not filed and made a part of the court’s record. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.