Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pusey v. Batorgreen2 sentences2022Nondelegable duties arise in various situations that generally fall into two categories: (1) affirmative duties that are imposed on the employer by statute, contract, franchise, charter, or common law and (2) duties imposed on the employer that arise out of the work itself because its performance creates dangers to -13- others, i.e., inherently dangerous work.” Pusey v. Bator, 94 Ohio St.3d 275, 279 , 762 N.E.2d 968 (2002), citing Prosser & Keeton, The Law of Torts (5 Ed.1984) 511-512, Section 71; Albain v. Flower Hosp., 50 Ohio St.3d 251, 260-261 , 553 N.E.2d 1038 (1990). 2008See Pusey v. Bator , supra. In Pusey , the court explained the nondelegable duty exception as follows: {¶ 26} "Nondelegable duties arise in various situations that generally fall into two categories: (1) affirmative duties that are imposed on the employer by statute, contract, *Page 7 franchise, charter, or common law and (2) duties imposed on the employer that arise out of the work itself because its performance creates dangers to others, i.e., inherently dangerous work. | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Albain v. Flower Hospital
green
2 sentences2011“Employers are held liable under the traditional nondelegable duty exception because the nature of the work contracted involves the need for some specific precaution, such as a railing around an excavation in a sidewalk, or the work involved is inherently dangerous, such as blasting.” Albain v. Flower Hosp. (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 251, 262 , 553 N.E.2d 1038 , overruled in part on other grounds by Clark. 2011“Employers are held liable under the traditional nondelegable duty exception because the nature of the work contracted involves the need for some specific precaution, such as a railing around an excavation in a sidewalk, or the work involved is inherently dangerous, such as blasting.” Albain v. Flower Hosp. (1990), 50 Ohio St.3d 251, 262 , 553 N.E.2d 1038 , overruled in part on other grounds by Clark. | 5 | 2004–2022 |
Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood Associates
green
2 sentences2021As to the first aspect of the nondelegable duty doctrine, a “landlord” who is under a duty to provide specified safeguards or precautions for the safety of others as created by statute or by administrative regulation, “‘is subject to liability to the others for whose protection the duty is imposed for harm caused by the failure of a contractor employed by him to provide such safeguards or precautions.’” Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood Assocs., 71 Ohio St.3d 414 , 421, 1994-Ohio- 427, 644 N.E.2d 291 , quoting 2 Restatement of the Law 2d, Torts, Section 424 (1965). 2021As to the first aspect of the nondelegable duty doctrine, a “landlord” who is under a duty to provide specified safeguards or precautions for the safety of others as created by statute or by administrative regulation, “‘is subject to liability to the others for whose protection the duty is imposed for harm caused by the failure of a contractor employed by him to provide such safeguards or precautions.’” Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood Assocs., 71 Ohio St.3d 414 , 421, 1994-Ohio- 427, 644 N.E.2d 291 , quoting 2 Restatement of the Law 2d, Torts, Section 424 (1965). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
City of Trotwood v. South Central Construction, L.L.C.
neutral
1 sentence2012Constr., L.L.C., 192 Ohio App.3d 69 , 2011-Ohio-237 , ¶ 38 (2d Dist.) Therefore, the nondelegable-duty doctrine does not abrogate statutory immunity for a political subdivision. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Clark v. Southview Hospital & Family Health Center
green
2 sentences2009Family Health Ctr. , 68 Ohio St. 3d 435 , syllabus (1994). 2009Under the nondelegable duty exception, "[liability is premised on the peculiar risks and special precautions attendant to the work itself, not upon a `holding out' by an employer that it has assumed a particular duty." Id. {¶ 14} Mr. Alvarez has not identified any peculiar risks associated with placing rugs on a floor that would suggest that the bank had a nondelegable duty to assure that they were laid flat. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Strayer v. Lindeman
green
2 sentences1990Co. v. Miller (1936), 131 Ohio St. 424 , 6 O.O. 119 , 3 N.E. 2d 360 , paragraphs one through four of the syllabus (duty to refrain from interfering with the right of the public to safe and unimpeded use of highways and streets, and the duty to keep premises reasonably safe); Strayer v. Lindeman (1981), 68 Ohio St. 2d 32 , 22 O.O. 3d 159, 427 N.E. 2d 781 , at syllabus (duty of a landlord to exercise reasonable care in proceeding with repairs). 1990Co. v. Miller (1936), 131 Ohio St. 424 , 6 O.O. 119 , 3 N.E. 2d 360 , paragraphs one through four of the syllabus (duty to refrain from interfering with the right of the public to safe and unimpeded use of highways and streets, and the duty to keep premises reasonably safe); Strayer v. Lindeman (1981), 68 Ohio St. 2d 32 , 22 O.O. 3d 159, 427 N.E. 2d 781 , at syllabus (duty of a landlord to exercise reasonable care in proceeding with repairs). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Richman Bros. v. Miller
green
2 sentences1990Co. v. Miller (1936), 131 Ohio St. 424 , 6 O.O. 119 , 3 N.E. 2d 360 , paragraphs one through four of the syllabus (duty to refrain from interfering with the right of the public to safe and unimpeded use of highways and streets, and the duty to keep premises reasonably safe); Strayer v. Lindeman (1981), 68 Ohio St. 2d 32 , 22 O.O. 3d 159, 427 N.E. 2d 781 , at syllabus (duty of a landlord to exercise reasonable care in proceeding with repairs). 1990Co. v. Miller (1936), 131 Ohio St. 424 , 6 O.O. 119 , 3 N.E. 2d 360 , paragraphs one through four of the syllabus (duty to refrain from interfering with the right of the public to safe and unimpeded use of highways and streets, and the duty to keep premises reasonably safe); Strayer v. Lindeman (1981), 68 Ohio St. 2d 32 , 22 O.O. 3d 159, 427 N.E. 2d 781 , at syllabus (duty of a landlord to exercise reasonable care in proceeding with repairs). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Stratso v. Song
green
2 sentences1990At least two lower courts have extended the nondelegable duty exception to a hospital providing independent physicians in the operating room, Stratso v. Song (1984), 17 Ohio App. 3d 39 , 17 OBR 93, 477 N.E. 2d 1176 (anesthesiologist), and to a hospital contracting with third-party physicians to operate the hospital’s emergency room facility, Griffin v. Matthews (1987), 36 Ohio App. 3d 228 , 522 N.E. 2d 1100 . 1990At least two lower courts have extended the nondelegable duty exception to a hospital providing independent physicians in the operating room, Stratso v. Song (1984), 17 Ohio App. 3d 39 , 17 OBR 93, 477 N.E. 2d 1176 (anesthesiologist), and to a hospital contracting with third-party physicians to operate the hospital’s emergency room facility, Griffin v. Matthews (1987), 36 Ohio App. 3d 228 , 522 N.E. 2d 1100 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Griffin v. Matthews
green
2 sentences1990At least two lower courts have extended the nondelegable duty exception to a hospital providing independent physicians in the operating room, Stratso v. Song (1984), 17 Ohio App. 3d 39 , 17 OBR 93, 477 N.E. 2d 1176 (anesthesiologist), and to a hospital contracting with third-party physicians to operate the hospital’s emergency room facility, Griffin v. Matthews (1987), 36 Ohio App. 3d 228 , 522 N.E. 2d 1100 . 1990At least two lower courts have extended the nondelegable duty exception to a hospital providing independent physicians in the operating room, Stratso v. Song (1984), 17 Ohio App. 3d 39 , 17 OBR 93, 477 N.E. 2d 1176 (anesthesiologist), and to a hospital contracting with third-party physicians to operate the hospital’s emergency room facility, Griffin v. Matthews (1987), 36 Ohio App. 3d 228 , 522 N.E. 2d 1100 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.