Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Crowdergreen1 sentence2025The trial court overruled Wood’s motion. {¶ 77} “[A]n indigent petitioner has neither a state nor a federal constitutional right -36- to be represented by an attorney in a postconviction proceeding.” State v. Crowder, 60 Ohio St.3d 151, 152 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
State v. McRaegreen1 sentence2024“When a trial date is set beyond the time limits of R.C. 2945.71 and the accused does not acquiesce in that date but merely fails to object to that date, the trial court's action does not constitute a continuance pursuant to R.C. 2945.72(H).” State v. McRae, 55 Ohio St.2d 149, 152 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Laddgreen1 sentence2024“The rationale supporting [the speedy-trial statutes] was to prevent inexcusable delays caused by indolence within the judicial system.” State v. Ladd, 56 Ohio St.2d 197, 200 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. McNeal
green
1 sentence2025It denied Wood’s motion for a new trial without a hearing. {¶ 64} “A trial court's ruling on a motion for leave to move for a new trial is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.” McNeal, 2022-Ohio-2703, at ¶ 13 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Awan
green
2 sentences2023Wood’s claim fails for multiple reasons. {¶ 70} As a preliminary matter, we note that Wood did not raise this constitutional argument during the trial court proceedings. “[T]he question of the constitutionality of a statute must generally be raised at the first opportunity and, in a criminal prosecution, this means in the trial court.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Awan, 22 Ohio St.3d 120, 122 , 489 N.E.2d 277 (1986). 2023Wood’s claim fails for multiple reasons. {¶ 70} As a preliminary matter, we note that Wood did not raise this constitutional argument during the trial court proceedings. “[T]he question of the constitutionality of a statute must generally be raised at the first opportunity and, in a criminal prosecution, this means in the trial court.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Awan, 22 Ohio St.3d 120, 122 , 489 N.E.2d 277 (1986). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Howard
green
2 sentences2013Because the indictment set 5 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS forth the charge of failure to notify, the trial court erred in granting Mr. Wood’s motion to dismiss. {¶11} We note, however, that in Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467 , 2012-Ohio- 5738, 983 N.E.2d 341, at ¶ 21 , the Ohio Supreme Court held that the version of Megan’s Law in effect just prior to the adoption of the AWA governs the penalty for a violation of R.C. 2950.05 for offenders who were originally classified under Megan’s Law. 2013Because the indictment set 5 OHIO FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS forth the charge of failure to notify, the trial court erred in granting Mr. Wood’s motion to dismiss. {¶11} We note, however, that in Howard, 134 Ohio St.3d 467 , 2012-Ohio- 5738, 983 N.E.2d 341, at ¶ 21 , the Ohio Supreme Court held that the version of Megan’s Law in effect just prior to the adoption of the AWA governs the penalty for a violation of R.C. 2950.05 for offenders who were originally classified under Megan’s Law. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Reeves v. Healy
green
2 sentences2012Id. {¶ 18} In light of the significant irregularities in the jury deliberations, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Wood’s motion for new trial. 2012Id. {¶ 18} In light of the significant irregularities in the jury deliberations, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Wood’s motion for new trial. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Thompkins
red
2 sentences2012State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 386 , 678 N.E.2d 541 (1999). 2012State v. Thompkins, 78 Ohio St.3d 380, 386 , 678 N.E.2d 541 (1999). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Warren Education Ass'n v. Warren City Board of Education
green
2 sentences2008Assn. v. Warren City Bd. of Edn. (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 170 , 18 OBR 225, 480 N.E.2d 456 , syllabus. 2008Assn. v. Warren City Bd. of Edn. (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 170 , 18 OBR 225, 480 N.E.2d 456 , syllabus. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Adomeit v. Baltimore
green
2 sentences2008Instead, "Civil Rule 60(B)(5) is only to be used in an extraordinary and unusual case when the interests of justice warrants it." Adomeit v. Baltimore (1974), 39 Ohio App.2d 97, 105 , 316 N.E.2d 469 . {¶ 45} The facts alleged in Davis and Wood's motion for relief from judgment do not present an unusual or extraordinary situation that would justify relief in the interests of justice. 2008Instead, "Civil Rule 60(B)(5) is only to be used in an extraordinary and unusual case when the interests of justice warrants it." Adomeit v. Baltimore (1974), 39 Ohio App.2d 97, 105 , 316 N.E.2d 469 . {¶ 45} The facts alleged in Davis and Wood's motion for relief from judgment do not present an unusual or extraordinary situation that would justify relief in the interests of justice. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Georgeoff v. O'Brien
green
1 sentence2005However, we have previously held that "when a trial court fails to rule upon a [pretrial] motion, it will be presumed that it was overruled." Georgeoff v. O'Brien (1995), 105 Ohio App.3d 373 , 378 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.