Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1985–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Chaneygreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Ardestani, 736 A.2d 552, 556 (Pa. 1999) (plurality) (holding that a decision issued during the pendency of the defendant’s direct appeal overruling the trial court’s basis for denying the defendant’s pretrial motion applied to require reversal and remand for a new trial); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 350 A.2d 829, 830 (Pa. 1975) (same). 2023See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Ardestani, 736 A.2d 552, 556 (Pa. 1999) (plurality) (holding that a decision issued during the pendency of the defendant’s direct appeal overruling the trial court’s basis for denying the defendant’s pretrial motion applied to require reversal and remand for a new trial); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 350 A.2d 829, 830 (Pa. 1975) (same). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Ardestanigreen2 sentences2023See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Ardestani, 736 A.2d 552, 556 (Pa. 1999) (plurality) (holding that a decision issued during the pendency of the defendant’s direct appeal overruling the trial court’s basis for denying the defendant’s pretrial motion applied to require reversal and remand for a new trial); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 350 A.2d 829, 830 (Pa. 1975) (same). 2023See, e.g., Commonwealth v. Ardestani, 736 A.2d 552, 556 (Pa. 1999) (plurality) (holding that a decision issued during the pendency of the defendant’s direct appeal overruling the trial court’s basis for denying the defendant’s pretrial motion applied to require reversal and remand for a new trial); Commonwealth v. Chaney, 350 A.2d 829, 830 (Pa. 1975) (same). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Com. v. Chichkin, I.
red
2 sentences2023The Union County [DA] declined to move [Appellant] into the ARD program in light of the holding of Commonwealth v. Chichkin, 232 A.3d 959 (Pa. Super. 2020).[1] [Appellant] filed a motion to reinstate [the ARD] program for first offense [DUI] cases in Union County and motion to compel nomination for [ARD] on September 28, 2020. 2023The Union County [DA] declined to move [Appellant] into the ARD program in light of the holding of Commonwealth v. Chichkin, 232 A.3d 959 (Pa. Super. 2020).[1] [Appellant] filed a motion to reinstate [the ARD] program for first offense [DUI] cases in Union County and motion to compel nomination for [ARD] on September 28, 2020. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Commonwealth v. Vesel
green
1 sentence2015See also Baird, supra (holding, absent exceptional circumstances, notice to defense counsel of court proceeding constitutes reasonable notice to defendant for purposes of determining defendant’s unavailability under Rule 600; defense counsel signed notice of arraignment form, but neither district magistrate nor counsel furnished defendant with actual notice of arraignment, and defendant failed to appear for scheduled arraignment; defendant sought to exclude from Rule 600 calculation time between scheduled arraignment date and defendant’s subsequent apprehension over one year following arraignm | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Commonwealth v. Frost
green
2 sentences1991Id., 342 Pa.Superior Ct. at 178, 492 A.2d at 450 . 1991Id., 342 Pa.Superior Ct. at 178, 492 A.2d at 450 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
McDevitt v. COMMONWEALTH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BUREAU OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
green
2 sentences1988As correctly noted by the Department, McDevitt was affirmed by our Supreme Court in McDevitt v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety, 500 Pa. 532 , 458 A.2d 939 (1983). 1988As correctly noted by the Department, McDevitt was affirmed by our Supreme Court in McDevitt v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety, 500 Pa. 532 , 458 A.2d 939 (1983). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Bureau of Traffic Safety v. McDevitt
green
1 sentence1988We decline to overrule our decision in Department of Transportation, Bureau of Traffic Safety v. McDevitt, 57 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 589, 427 A.2d 280 (1981), as Appellant requests, which is dispositive of the ARD issue. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Causer v. Mandarino
green
2 sentences1987The letter states, “the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania adopted a Rule authorizing the courts of this county to institute a *238 unique program for non-violent offenders.” The letter also states that in order to qualify for the program, a defendant must “not be accused of a crime of serious violence.” Id. 1987The letter states, “the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania adopted a Rule authorizing the courts of this county to institute a *238 unique program for non-violent offenders.” The letter also states that in order to qualify for the program, a defendant must “not be accused of a crime of serious violence.” Id. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Commonwealth v. Knupp
neutral
2 sentences1986Commonwealth v. Knupp, 340 Pa. Super. 304 , 490 A.2d 1 (1985). 1986Commonwealth v. Knupp, 340 Pa. Super. 304 , 490 A.2d 1 (1985). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Commonwealth v. Iancovetti
green
2 sentences1985Commonwealth v. Iancovetti, 298 Pa.Super. 441 , 444 A.2d 1257 (1982). 1985Commonwealth v. Iancovetti, 298 Pa.Super. 441 , 444 A.2d 1257 (1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.