Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Edmistongreen2 sentences1999Commonwealth v. LaCava, 542 Pa. 160, 178 , 666 A.2d 221, 229 (1995)(citing Commonwealth v. Edmiston, 535 Pa. 210, 237 , 634 A.2d 1078, 1092 (1993)). 1999Commonwealth v. LaCava, 542 Pa. 160, 178 , 666 A.2d 221, 229 (1995)(citing Commonwealth v. Edmiston, 535 Pa. 210, 237 , 634 A.2d 1078, 1092 (1993)). | 7 | 7 |
Commonwealth v. LaCavagreen2 sentences1999Commonwealth v. LaCava, 542 Pa. 160, 178 , 666 A.2d 221, 229 (1995)(citing Commonwealth v. Edmiston, 535 Pa. 210, 237 , 634 A.2d 1078, 1092 (1993)). 1999Commonwealth v. LaCava, 542 Pa. 160, 178 , 666 A.2d 221, 229 (1995)(citing Commonwealth v. Edmiston, 535 Pa. 210, 237 , 634 A.2d 1078, 1092 (1993)). | 5 | 5 |
Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parolegreen1 sentence2003Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 739 A.2d 1142, 1145 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) (quoting Commonwealth v. Lassiter, 554 Pa. 586, 592 , 722 A.2d 657, 660 (1998)) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Lassitergreen2 sentences2003Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 739 A.2d 1142, 1145 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) (quoting Commonwealth v. Lassiter, 554 Pa. 586, 592 , 722 A.2d 657, 660 (1998)) (citations omitted). 2003Scott v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 739 A.2d 1142, 1145 (Pa.Cmwlth.1999) (quoting Commonwealth v. Lassiter, 554 Pa. 586, 592 , 722 A.2d 657, 660 (1998)) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Baezgreen2 sentences2000As this court recently stated: “A criminal defendant sustains a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel by proving: (1) that the underlying claim is of arguable merit; (2) that counsel’s performance had no reasonable basis; and (3) that counsel’s ineffectiveness worked to his prejudice.” Commonwealth v. Baez, 554 Pa. 66 , 720 A.2d 711, 733 (1998). 2000As this court recently stated: “A criminal defendant sustains a claim of ineffectiveness of counsel by proving: (1) that the underlying claim is of arguable merit; (2) that counsel’s performance had no reasonable basis; and (3) that counsel’s ineffectiveness worked to his prejudice.” Commonwealth v. Baez, 554 Pa. 66 , 720 A.2d 711, 733 (1998). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.