9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 5 courts 1936–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McDaniel v. Merck, Sharp & Dohmegreen2 sentences2019See McDaniel v. Merck., Sharp & Dohme , [ 367 Pa.Super. 600 ], 533 A.2d 436 , 447 ( [Pa.Super.] 1987) ; see also Judge Bernstein in Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence, 2015 Ed., at p. 831. d . 2019See McDaniel v. Merck., Sharp & Dohme , [ 367 Pa.Super. 600 ], 533 A.2d 436 , 447 ( [Pa.Super.] 1987) ; see also Judge Bernstein in Pennsylvania Rules of Evidence, 2015 Ed., at p. 831. d . | 1 | 1 |
Crawford v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2015See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S.Ct. 1354, 1361 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). 4 . 2015See Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 , 124 S.Ct. 1354, 1361 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). 4 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Colemangreen1 sentence2011Coleman, 664 A.2d at 1384-85 (“There is simply no basis in the record before us for concluding that in this case, the complaining witness’ prior criminal conviction was premised on conduct displaying dishonesty or false statement which would indicate the commission of crimen falsi”), appeal denied, 545 Pa. 675 , 682 A.2d 306 (1996). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Romerogreen2 sentences2002Commonwealth v. Romero, 555 Pa. 4 , 722 A.2d 1014, 1017 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 952 , 120 S.Ct. 376 , 145 L.Ed.2d 293 (1999). 3 ¶ 20 Here, the habeas court found that although Torres’s statement was reduced to writing and then signed and adopted by her at the time she gave it, the cross-examination requirement was not satisfied. 2002Commonwealth v. Romero, 555 Pa. 4 , 722 A.2d 1014, 1017 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 952 , 120 S.Ct. 376 , 145 L.Ed.2d 293 (1999). 3 ¶ 20 Here, the habeas court found that although Torres’s statement was reduced to writing and then signed and adopted by her at the time she gave it, the cross-examination requirement was not satisfied. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Haywoodgreen2 sentences1988See Commonwealth v. Haywood, 464 Pa. 226 , 346 A.2d 298 , 301 fn. 7 (1975). 1988See Commonwealth v. Haywood, 464 Pa. 226 , 346 A.2d 298 , 301 fn. 7 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Storygreen2 sentences1987See Commonwealth v. Story, 476 Pa. 391 , 383 A.2d 155 (1978). 1987See Commonwealth v. Story, 476 Pa. 391 , 383 A.2d 155 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crenshaw v. Baynerd
green
1 sentence2002Commonwealth v. Romero, 555 Pa. 4 , 722 A.2d 1014, 1017 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 952 , 120 S.Ct. 376 , 145 L.Ed.2d 293 (1999). 3 ¶ 20 Here, the habeas court found that although Torres’s statement was reduced to writing and then signed and adopted by her at the time she gave it, the cross-examination requirement was not satisfied. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Zora Enterprises, Inc. v. Town of Marion
green
1 sentence2002Commonwealth v. Romero, 555 Pa. 4 , 722 A.2d 1014, 1017 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 952 , 120 S.Ct. 376 , 145 L.Ed.2d 293 (1999). 3 ¶ 20 Here, the habeas court found that although Torres’s statement was reduced to writing and then signed and adopted by her at the time she gave it, the cross-examination requirement was not satisfied. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Hedrick v. Virginia
green
1 sentence2002Commonwealth v. Romero, 555 Pa. 4 , 722 A.2d 1014, 1017 (1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 952 , 120 S.Ct. 376 , 145 L.Ed.2d 293 (1999). 3 ¶ 20 Here, the habeas court found that although Torres’s statement was reduced to writing and then signed and adopted by her at the time she gave it, the cross-examination requirement was not satisfied. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Rafter v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
green
2 sentences1995Id. at 366 , 632 A.2d at 900 . 1995Id. at 366 , 632 A.2d at 900 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Felix v. Hall-Brooke Sanitarium
green
1 sentence1972Felix v. Hall-Brooke Sanitarium, 140 Conn. 496 , 502 . . . .” The plaintiff in this case was represented during the course of the trial by competent counsel who was capable of conduct-. ing a cross-examination of the defense witnesses sufficient for the protection of his client’s rights. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Jessop v. Ivory
neutral
1 sentence1936Counsel remarked, “If I cannot question this witness as to credibility any more, I have no further questions to ask.” The extent to which a witness may be cross-examined for this purpose rests in the sound discretion of the trial court (Jessop v. Ivory, 158 Pa. 71 ), and its action in restricting this cross-examination was not error. | 1 | 1936–1936 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.