Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 5 courts 1978–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
MacGregor v. Mediq Inc.green2 sentences2001Moreover, prejudice, in turn, must be more than a mere detriment to the other party because any amendment requested certainly will be designed to strengthen the legal position of the amending party and correspondingly weaken the position of the adverse party.” MacGregor v. Mediq Inc., 395 Pa. Super. 221, 227 , 576 A.2d 1123, 1126 (1990). (citations and quotation marks omitted). 2001Moreover, prejudice, in turn, must be more than a mere detriment to the other party because any amendment requested certainly will be designed to strengthen the legal position of the amending party and correspondingly weaken the position of the adverse party.” MacGregor v. Mediq Inc., 395 Pa. Super. 221, 227 , 576 A.2d 1123, 1126 (1990). (citations and quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Biglan v. Biglan
green
2 sentences2025“The fundamental purpose of this rule is to prevent cases from turning on purely technical defects.” Biglan, 479 A.2d at 1026 . 1990“The fundamental purpose of this rule is to prevent cases from turning on purely technical defects.” Id., 330 Pa.Superior Ct. at 521, 479 A.2d at 1026 . | 4 | 1986–2025 |
Capobianchi v. Bic Corp.
green
1 sentence2025“The timeliness of the request to amend is a factor to be considered, but it is to be considered only insofar as it presents a question of prejudice to the opposing party, as by loss of witnesses or eleventh hour surprise.” Capobianchi, 666 A.2d at 347 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Newcomer v. Civil Service Commission
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax Commission
green
1 sentence1988This free trade purpose is not confined to the freedom to trade with only one state; it is a freedom to trade with any state,, to engage in commerce across all state boundaries.” 429 U.S. at 334-5 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Solomon v. Luria
green
2 sentences1984Keller v. Keller Motor Co., 386 Pa. 56 , 124 A.2d 105 (1956); Solomon v. Luria, 213 Pa.Super. 87 , 246 A.2d 435 (1968). 1984Keller v. Keller Motor Co., 386 Pa. 56 , 124 A.2d 105 (1956); Solomon v. Luria, 213 Pa.Super. 87 , 246 A.2d 435 (1968). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Keller v. R. C. Keller Motor Co.
green
2 sentences1984Keller v. Keller Motor Co., 386 Pa. 56 , 124 A.2d 105 (1956); Solomon v. Luria, 213 Pa.Super. 87 , 246 A.2d 435 (1968). 1984Keller v. Keller Motor Co., 386 Pa. 56 , 124 A.2d 105 (1956); Solomon v. Luria, 213 Pa.Super. 87 , 246 A.2d 435 (1968). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Norwood v. Judd
green
2 sentences1978Where, by applying the rule, the public cannot be protected because the transaction has been completed, where no serious moral turpitude is involved, where the defendant is the one guilty of the greatest moral fault, and where to apply the rule will be to permit the defendant to be unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff, the rule should not be applied.” Norwood v. Judd, 93 Cal. App. 2d 276, 289 , 209 P. 2d 24 . 1978Where, by applying the rule, the public cannot be protected because the transaction has been completed, where no serious moral turpitude is involved, where the defendant is the one guilty of the greatest moral fault, and where to apply the rule will be to permit the defendant to be unjustly enriched at the expense of the plaintiff, the rule should not be applied.” Norwood v. Judd, 93 Cal. App. 2d 276, 289 , 209 P. 2d 24 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.