Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2019The gist of these decisions is that a bill will be held to violate the single-subject rule only if it includes topics with “unrelated subject matter,” id. at 303 , 877 A.2d at 400 , where “unrelated” connotes that any attempt to tie the provisions together within a single, unifying subject necessarily involves an overly-broad topic – such as the business of the courts, municipalities, or the economic wellbeing of the Commonwealth – which would empty the germaneness test of all meaning. 2019The gist of these decisions is that a bill will be held to violate the single-subject rule only if it includes topics with “unrelated subject matter,” id. at 303 , 877 A.2d at 400 , where “unrelated” connotes that any attempt to tie the provisions together within a single, unifying subject necessarily involves an overly-broad topic – such as the business of the courts, municipalities, or the economic wellbeing of the Commonwealth – which would empty the germaneness test of all meaning. | 1 | 4 |
Stilp v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2023Washington, 188 A.3d at 1151 ; Stilp, 905 A.2d at 959 ; PAGE, 877 A.2d at 410 . [J-50-2022] - 28 However, when the court must hypothesize an “unduly expansive” subject to sustain an enactment, the General Assembly has violated its constitutional mandate. 2019Stilp v. Commonwealth, 588 Pa. 539, 603 , 905 A.2d 918, 956 (2006) (quotation marks and citation omitted). | 1 | 4 |
DeWeese v. Weavergreen2 sentences2013Id. at 588 (citing, e.g., DeWeese v. Weaver, 824 A.2d 364 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003) (finding the theme “business of the courts” too encompassing to uphold a law regulating DNA records and apportioning negligence liability); Pa. Ass’n of Rental Dealers v. Com., 123 Pa.Cmwlth. 533 , 554 A.2d 998 (1989) (holding that the topic of “economic well-being of the Commonwealth” would turn the germaneness requirement into a nullity)). 2003But see Pennsylvania *578 Ass’n of Rental Dealers v. Commonwealth, 123 Pa.Cmwlth. 533, 540 , 554 A.2d 998,1002 (1989) (rejecting an argument that all the challenged amendments were germane to the single topic of the “economic well being of the Commonwealth,” as that would render the germaneness test meaningless); DeWeese, 824 A.2d at 370 (rejecting the position that expunging criminal DNA records and apportioning negligence liability are both germane to the single subject of “the business of the courts”). | 1 | 2 |
Leach, D. v. Turzai, M.green1 sentence2018See Leach v. Commonwealth, 636 Pa. 81 , 141 A.3d 426 , 433-434 (2016) (provisions criminalizing scrap metal theft and granting standing to individuals to challenge the constitutionality of municipalities' lost or stolen gun ordinances could not be unified under the general subjects of "regulation of firearms" or "the ability to own a firearm"); Neiman (holding that the proposed subjects of "refining civil remedies" or "judicial remedies" were too broad to be unifying subjects for multiple provisions of a bill pertaining to: deficiency judgment procedures, statutes of limitations for personal i | 1 | 1 |
Ocirne, Inc. v. New Tees Co.green1 sentence2018See Leach v. Commonwealth, 636 Pa. 81 , 141 A.3d 426 , 433-434 (2016) (provisions criminalizing scrap metal theft and granting standing to individuals to challenge the constitutionality of municipalities' lost or stolen gun ordinances could not be unified under the general subjects of "regulation of firearms" or "the ability to own a firearm"); Neiman (holding that the proposed subjects of "refining civil remedies" or "judicial remedies" were too broad to be unifying subjects for multiple provisions of a bill pertaining to: deficiency judgment procedures, statutes of limitations for personal i | 1 | 1 |
Sernovitz v. Dershawgreen1 sentence2015See id. 6 Defendants requested reconsideration or reargument en banc, stating, among other things, that the court should have applied the laches -doctrine to avoid setting aside, on procedural grounds, a statute that had been enacted 22 years earlier and whose provisions had been relied on by hundreds, if not thousands, of litigants and potential litigants — including ■ felony defendants whose charges were not dismissed at a preliminary hearing and individuals who elected not to assert wrongful-birth claims due to the substantive validity of Section 8305. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
PA. ASS'N OF RENT. DEAL. v. Com. of Pa.green2 sentences2013Id. at 588 (citing, e.g., DeWeese v. Weaver, 824 A.2d 364 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003) (finding the theme “business of the courts” too encompassing to uphold a law regulating DNA records and apportioning negligence liability); Pa. Ass’n of Rental Dealers v. Com., 123 Pa.Cmwlth. 533 , 554 A.2d 998 (1989) (holding that the topic of “economic well-being of the Commonwealth” would turn the germaneness requirement into a nullity)). 2013Id. at 588 (citing, e.g., DeWeese v. Weaver, 824 A.2d 364 (Pa.Cmwlth.2003) (finding the theme “business of the courts” too encompassing to uphold a law regulating DNA records and apportioning negligence liability); Pa. Ass’n of Rental Dealers v. Com., 123 Pa.Cmwlth. 533 , 554 A.2d 998 (1989) (holding that the topic of “economic well-being of the Commonwealth” would turn the germaneness requirement into a nullity)). | 1 | 3 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Philadelphia v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences2023Additionally, relying on the germaneness test set forth in City of Philadelphia, supra, the court rejected Appellants’ Article III, Section 3 single subject challenge because the court considered all of the provisions of Act 12 to pertain to variations of the single unifying subject of “the provision of General Assistance to low-income individuals,” and “the provision of ‘basic necessities of life to certain low-income individuals.’” Id. at 670 (quoting Weeks II, 222 A.3d at 730). 14 The court eschewed Appellants’ argument that the revenue raising provisions for hospitals and nursing homes add 2023Additionally, relying on the germaneness test set forth in City of Philadelphia, supra, the court rejected Appellants’ Article III, Section 3 single subject challenge because the court considered all of the provisions of Act 12 to pertain to variations of the single unifying subject of “the provision of General Assistance to low-income individuals,” and “the provision of ‘basic necessities of life to certain low-income individuals.’” Id. at 670 (quoting Weeks II, 222 A.3d at 730). 14 The court eschewed Appellants’ argument that the revenue raising provisions for hospitals and nursing homes add | 2 | 2013–2023 |
Washington, Aplts. v. Dept. of Pub. Welfare
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 1151 n.33 (citing Stilp v. Commonwealth , 588 Pa. 539 , 905 A.2d 918 , 919 (2006) ; Pennsylvanians Against Gambling Expansion Fund, Inc. v. Commonwealth , 583 Pa. 275 , 877 A.2d 383 , 410 (2005) ). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Strickland v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
green
1 sentence2018See Leach v. Commonwealth, 636 Pa. 81 , 141 A.3d 426 , 433-434 (2016) (provisions criminalizing scrap metal theft and granting standing to individuals to challenge the constitutionality of municipalities' lost or stolen gun ordinances could not be unified under the general subjects of "regulation of firearms" or "the ability to own a firearm"); Neiman (holding that the proposed subjects of "refining civil remedies" or "judicial remedies" were too broad to be unifying subjects for multiple provisions of a bill pertaining to: deficiency judgment procedures, statutes of limitations for personal i | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Washington v. Department of Public Welfare
green
1 sentence2018Likewise we reject the proposed unifying subject for Act 80 offered by the Commonwealth Court, and endorsed by DPW: “the regulation and funding of human services programs regulated by [DPW],” Washington, 71 A.3d at 1080 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Pennsylvania State Ass'n of Jury Commissioners v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2018See Leach v. Commonwealth, 636 Pa. 81 , 141 A.3d 426 , 433-434 (2016) (provisions criminalizing scrap metal theft and granting standing to individuals to challenge the constitutionality of municipalities' lost or stolen gun ordinances could not be unified under the general subjects of "regulation of firearms" or "the ability to own a firearm"); Neiman (holding that the proposed subjects of "refining civil remedies" or "judicial remedies" were too broad to be unifying subjects for multiple provisions of a bill pertaining to: deficiency judgment procedures, statutes of limitations for personal i | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Fumo v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
green
2 sentences2009Comm’n, 719 A.2d 10 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998), the Commonwealth Court applied the germaneness test and upheld a bill which addressed the number of years that a taxicab could be operated and the deregulation of electricity generation. 2009Comm'n, 719 A.2d 10 (Pa.Cmwlth.1998), the Commonwealth Court applied the germaneness test and upheld a bill which addressed the number of years that a taxicab could be operated and the deregulation of electricity generation. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.