9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
SAFEGUARD MUTUAL INS. COM. PENNSYLVANIA INS. GUARANTY v. Joycegreen1 sentence2025As in Buffington, the general rule is that “[a] mistrial because a jury is unable to reach a verdict is the classic case where double jeopardy considerations do not prevent a retrial.” See McCane, 539 A.2d at 344 (holding that a finding of guilt on driving under the influence did not bar retrial on homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence where the jury was unable to reach a verdict on the latter offense). | 1 | 1 |
COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Bouchergreen1 sentence2020Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Boucher, 691 A.2d 450, 453 (Pa. 1997); Martinovic v. Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 881 A.2d 30, 34 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Martinovic v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensinggreen1 sentence2020Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Boucher, 691 A.2d 450, 453 (Pa. 1997); Martinovic v. Dep’t of Transp., Bureau of Driver Licensing, 881 A.2d 30, 34 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Wolengreen2 sentences2014See Commonwealth v. Wolen, 546 Pa. 448 , 685 A.2d 1384 (1996) (plurality opinion); Commonwealth v. Byers, 437 Pa.Super. 502 , 650 A.2d 468 (1994); Commonwealth v. Price, 416 Pa.Super. 23 , 610 A.2d 488 (1992). 2014See Commonwealth v. Wolen, 546 Pa. 448 , 685 A.2d 1384 (1996) (plurality opinion); Commonwealth v. Byers, 437 Pa.Super. 502 , 650 A.2d 468 (1994); Commonwealth v. Price, 416 Pa.Super. 23 , 610 A.2d 488 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hansongreen1 sentence1996See, State v. Hanson, 543 N.W.2d 84 (Minn. 1996) (civil driver’s license revocation pursuant to implied consent statute for driving under the influence did not bar subsequent criminal prosecution for same conduct under double jeopardy principles). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Eichler
green
1 sentence2026Under said section, the Commonwealth must show good cause explaining why the test was not conducted within the two [] hours and that the defendant did not imbibe any alcohol in the interim. 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3802(g); [see Eichler, 133 A.3d at 791 .] As requested by the Commonwealth, [the] court had the opportunity to review our Supreme Court’s decision in the matter of [Starry, in which it] noted that an extraordinarily elevated chemical test result may serve as a strong inference that a defendant operated a motor vehicle under the influence even if the test occurred outside of the two [] hour wi | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Commonwealth v. McCurdy
green
1 sentence2019Commonwealth v. McCurdy, 735 A.2d 681 (Pa. 1999). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Commonwealth v. Wolgemuth
green
1 sentence2018Appellee further claims the Commonwealth's appeal is improper under this Court's decision in Commonwealth v. Wolgemuth , 737 A.2d 757 (Pa.Super. 1999), and the proper procedure following the dismissal of charges for failing to make a prima facie case is for the Commonwealth to re-arrest and re-charge Appellee. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Ball v. United States
green
2 sentences2017Citing Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856 , 105 S.Ct. 1668 , 84 L.Ed.2d 740 (1985), 6 Appellant argues that the protec *213 tion against double jeopardy precluded the trial court from convicting and sentencing her for three DUI offenses stemming from a single episode of driving under the influence in violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3802(a)(1). 2017Citing Ball v. United States, 470 U.S. 856 , 105 S.Ct. 1668 , 84 L.Ed.2d 740 (1985), 6 Appellant argues that the protec *213 tion against double jeopardy precluded the trial court from convicting and sentencing her for three DUI offenses stemming from a single episode of driving under the influence in violation of 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 3802(a)(1). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Commonwealth v. Byers
green
2 sentences2014See Commonwealth v. Wolen, 546 Pa. 448 , 685 A.2d 1384 (1996) (plurality opinion); Commonwealth v. Byers, 437 Pa.Super. 502 , 650 A.2d 468 (1994); Commonwealth v. Price, 416 Pa.Super. 23 , 610 A.2d 488 (1992). 2014See Commonwealth v. Wolen, 546 Pa. 448 , 685 A.2d 1384 (1996) (plurality opinion); Commonwealth v. Byers, 437 Pa.Super. 502 , 650 A.2d 468 (1994); Commonwealth v. Price, 416 Pa.Super. 23 , 610 A.2d 488 (1992). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Commonwealth v. Price
green
2 sentences2014See Commonwealth v. Wolen, 546 Pa. 448 , 685 A.2d 1384 (1996) (plurality opinion); Commonwealth v. Byers, 437 Pa.Super. 502 , 650 A.2d 468 (1994); Commonwealth v. Price, 416 Pa.Super. 23 , 610 A.2d 488 (1992). 2014See Commonwealth v. Wolen, 546 Pa. 448 , 685 A.2d 1384 (1996) (plurality opinion); Commonwealth v. Byers, 437 Pa.Super. 502 , 650 A.2d 468 (1994); Commonwealth v. Price, 416 Pa.Super. 23 , 610 A.2d 488 (1992). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Commonwealth v. Gonzalez
green
2 sentences1998Although our Supreme Court has discussed the complex nature of such testimony on several occasions, see, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gonzalez, *529 519 Pa. 116 , 546 A.2d 26 (1988); Commonwealth v. Jarman, 529 Pa. 92 , 601 A.2d 1229 (1992), such testimony is nonetheless admissible when offered by a properly qualified expert. 1998Although our Supreme Court has discussed the complex nature of such testimony on several occasions, see, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gonzalez, *529 519 Pa. 116 , 546 A.2d 26 (1988); Commonwealth v. Jarman, 529 Pa. 92 , 601 A.2d 1229 (1992), such testimony is nonetheless admissible when offered by a properly qualified expert. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Commonwealth v. Jarman
green
2 sentences1998Although our Supreme Court has discussed the complex nature of such testimony on several occasions, see, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gonzalez, *529 519 Pa. 116 , 546 A.2d 26 (1988); Commonwealth v. Jarman, 529 Pa. 92 , 601 A.2d 1229 (1992), such testimony is nonetheless admissible when offered by a properly qualified expert. 1998Although our Supreme Court has discussed the complex nature of such testimony on several occasions, see, e.g., Commonwealth v. Gonzalez, *529 519 Pa. 116 , 546 A.2d 26 (1988); Commonwealth v. Jarman, 529 Pa. 92 , 601 A.2d 1229 (1992), such testimony is nonetheless admissible when offered by a properly qualified expert. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.