9 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1921–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Malley v. American Indemnity Co.green2 sentences2020Accord Malley, supra at 573 . 2020Accord Malley, supra at 573 . | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Morris
green
2 sentences1986State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Morris, 289 Pa. Super. 137 , 432 A.2d 1089 (1981). 1986State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Morris, 289 Pa. Super. 137 , 432 A.2d 1089 (1981). | 2 | 1986–1986 |
MH DAVIS ESTATE OIL CO. v. Underground Storage Tank Indemnification Board
green
1 sentence2023MH Davis, 789 A.2d at 401-04 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Lambakis v. Exar
green
2 sentences2019Lambakis v. Exar, 340 Pa. Super. 483 , 490 A.2d 882 (1985). 2019Lambakis v. Exar, 340 Pa. Super. 483 , 490 A.2d 882 (1985). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Moranko, F. v. Downs Racing
green
1 sentence2019Issues not raised in the lower court are waived and cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 302(a); Dilliplaine v. Lehigh Valley Trust Co., supra; Moranko·v. Downs Racing, LP, supra. Discussion (1) Failure t0 Hold Hearing on Defendant's Petition to Open Judgment In order to prevail on a Petition to Open Judgment, a petitioner is required to: (1) respond promptly to the entry of judgment, (2) allege a meritorious defense, and (3) present evidence sufficient to allow the submission of that defense to a jury. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Glasgow, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
green
1 sentence2004First, he stated that such information was "not readably [sic] accessible." (Secretary's Letter Decision at 2.) Second, he stated that until a contractor submits the required information, it "has a great deal of flexibility regarding the use of particular subcontractors." Id. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Garris v. Bell
neutral
2 sentences1952Cf. Garris v. Bell, 253 Pa. 33, 34 , 97 A. 1034 , aff'd. per curiam. 1952Cf. Garris v. Bell, 253 Pa. 33, 34 , 97 A. 1034 , aff'd. per curiam. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Osterling v. Carpenter
green
1 sentence1921This does not mean, however, that the case must be retried; whether there shall be necessity for a new trial depends upon the attitude of the appellee: Osterling v. Carpenter, 230 Pa. 153 . | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.