submission rule (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

submission rule in Indiana

5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1869–1999 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Klessig green
wis · 1997
1 sentence

1999It called the written stipulation signed by the appropriate parties “an essential prerequisite to the admission of such evidence at trial.” Id.

11999–1999
Truman v. Scott neutral
ind · 1880
1 sentence

1881Truman v. Scott, 72 Ind. 258 .

11881–1881
Womack v. Mcahren neutral
ind · 1857
1 sentence

1873In Womack v. McAhren, 9 Ind. 6 , a question was decided by the court much like this.

11873–1873
Estep v. Larsh neutral
ind · 1861
1 sentence

1870Estep v. Larsh, 16 Ind. 82 , and cases there cited.

11870–1870
Hays v. Miller neutral
ind · 1859
1 sentence

1869Tour inquiry will be as to whether they refused to consider any matter that was brought before them and submitted to them by these parties; if they refused to consider any matter, to ascertain whether it was partnership or not, their award cannot stand.” In Hays v. Miller, 12 Ind. 187 , it is said, “ this was a submission where no cause was pending, and there was no agreement to make the submission a rule of court.

11869–1869

Where else courts name it

MO 207 (1895–2025) TX 118 (1931–2025) NY 41 (1862–2025) TN 28 (1991–2026) CO 25 (1920–2017) IA 18 (1920–2019) NC 16 (1915–2020) CA 15 (1967–2025) IL 14 (1892–2025) NM 13 (1935–2026) OK 10 (1921–1995) CT 9 (1936–2013) PA 9 (1921–2023) WA 8 (1912–2016) AZ 8 (1970–2012) AR 8 (1999–2017) NJ 8 (1828–2026) MS 7 (1992–2005) MN 7 (1936–2008) OH 6 (1958–2012) ME 6 (1900–2021) IN 5 (1869–1999) MA 5 (1853–2016) FL 4 (1977–2017) WI 3 (1977–1993) LA 3 (1987–2014) AL 3 (1943–2010) MI 3 (1974–2024) KS 3 (1961–1992) HI 2 (1942–2000) NE 2 (1954–1958) VT 2 (2013–2025) ND 2 (1991–2009) WV 2 (1988–1992) NH 2 (1842–1986) MD 2 (1997–2007) WY 2 (1992–2000) SD 2 (1982–1989) GA 2 (1922–1984)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check