9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 1939–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Elam v. Stategreen2 sentences2008Elam v. State, 841 S.W.2d 937, 940 (Tex. App.—Austin 1992, no pet.) (holding that mere citation of authority without discussion of the facts showing error is insufficient argument and that mere references to record pages does not sufficiently identify the actions of which complaint is made). 2003Elam v. State, 841 S.W.2d 937, 940 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no pet.) (holding that mere citation of authority without discussion of the facts showing error is insufficient argument and that mere references to record pages does not sufficiently identify the actions of which complaint is made). | 5 | 5 |
Hawkins v. Stategreen2 sentences1992Hawkins v. State, 807 S.W.2d 874, 875 (Tex.App. — Beaumont 1991, pet. ref’d); Tex.R.App.P. 74(f). 1992Hawkins v. State , 807 S.W.2d 874, 875 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 1991, pet. ref'd); Tex. R. | 2 | 2 |
In the Interest of Guillorygreen1 sentence1988See In the Interest of Guillory, 618 S.W.2d 948, 950-51 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1981, no writ). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lawther Grain Co. v. Winniford
green
1 sentence1939This is true because, as has been said, “courts ought not, in such cases, set aside judgments rendered, except upon a showing which, if true and unexplained, would change the result on subsequent trial.” Holliday v. Holliday, 72 Tex. 581, 585 , 10 S.W. 690, 692 ; Lawther Grain Co. v. Winniford, Tex.Com.App., 249 S.W. 195 , par. 5; Wichita Valley Ry. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Holliday v. Holliday
green
2 sentences1939This is true because, as has been said, “courts ought not, in such cases, set aside judgments rendered, except upon a showing which, if true and unexplained, would change the result on subsequent trial.” Holliday v. Holliday, 72 Tex. 581, 585 , 10 S.W. 690, 692 ; Lawther Grain Co. v. Winniford, Tex.Com.App., 249 S.W. 195 , par. 5; Wichita Valley Ry. 1939This is true because, as has been said, “courts ought not, in such cases, set aside judgments rendered, except upon a showing which, if true and unexplained, would change the result on subsequent trial.” Holliday v. Holliday, 72 Tex. 581, 585 , 10 S.W. 690, 692 ; Lawther Grain Co. v. Winniford, Tex.Com.App., 249 S.W. 195 , par. 5; Wichita Valley Ry. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.