9 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Malchi v. Thalergreen2 sentences2012See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557 (1974) (holding that Nebraska statute bestowing mandatory sentence reductions for good behavior created liberty interest in credits); Malchi, 211 F.3d at 953 (noting that “when a state creates a right to good time credit and recognizes that its revocation is an unauthorized sanction for misconduct, a prisoner’s interest therein is embraced within the Fourteenth Amendment’s liberty concern”). 2012See Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539, 557 (1974) (holding that Nebraska statute bestowing mandatory sentence reductions for good behavior created liberty interest in credits) ; Malchi , 211 F.3d at 953 (noting that "when a state creates a right to good time credit and recognizes that its revocation is an unauthorized sanction for misconduct, a prisoner's interest therein is embraced within the Fourteenth Amendment's liberty concern"). | 2 | 2 |
Wolff v. McDonnellgreen2 sentences2012See Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557 (1974) (holding that Nebraska statute bestowing mandatory sentence reductions for good behavior created liberty interest in credits); Malchi, 211 F.3d at 953 (noting that “when a state creates a right to good time credit and recognizes that its revocation is an unauthorized sanction for misconduct, a prisoner’s interest therein is embraced within the Fourteenth Amendment’s liberty concern”). 2012See Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539, 557 (1974) (holding that Nebraska statute bestowing mandatory sentence reductions for good behavior created liberty interest in credits) ; Malchi , 211 F.3d at 953 (noting that "when a state creates a right to good time credit and recognizes that its revocation is an unauthorized sanction for misconduct, a prisoner's interest therein is embraced within the Fourteenth Amendment's liberty concern"). | 2 | 2 |
Olivo v. Stategreen1 sentence2025See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 523 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Guidry v. Stategreen1 sentence2015A. Vargas’s motion for new trial and supporting exhibits were “sufficient to put the trial court on notice that reasonable grounds existed to believe that trial counsel'ʹs representation may have been ineffective.” Guidry v. State, 132 S.W.3d 611, 613 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
McConnell v. Maygreen1 sentence2013See, e.g., McConnell, 5 800 S.W.2d at 194 (unverified motion to reinstate does not extend plenary power). | 1 | 1 |
Hunter v. Stategreen2 sentences2000See Hunter, 955 S.W.2d at 104 n. 2. 2000See Hunter, 955 S.W.2d at 104 n. 2. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda
green
1 sentence2017Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 15 227–28. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In Re Ramsey
green
1 sentence2013The facts of this case are similar to the facts of In re Ramsey, 28 S.W.3d 58 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, orig. proceeding). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Vasquez v. State
green
1 sentence2003SeeVasquez , 67 S.W.3d at 240 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.