9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Caterpillar Inc. v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2025Complete preemption exists when “the pre-emptive force of a [federal] statute is so ‘extraordinary’ that it ‘converts an ordinary state common-law complaint into one stating a federal claim for purposes of the well-pleaded complaint rule.’” Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 393 (quoting Metro. 2010See, e.g., Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392 , 107 S.Ct. 2425, 2429 , 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987). | 3 | 4 |
Marsh v. Austin-Fort Worth Coca-Cola Bottling Companygreen2 sentences2010See AMT, 504 F.3d at 1269 (holding, "[b]ecause proof of patent infringement is necessary to show AMT would have prevailed in the prior litigation, patent infringement is a `necessary element' of AMT's malpractice claim and therefore apparently presents a substantial question of patent law conferring § 1338 jurisdiction"); Immunocept, 504 F.3d at 1285 (recognizing "a determination of patent infringement serves as the basis of § 1338 jurisdiction over related state law claims"); see also Christianson, 486 U.S. at 809 , 108 S.Ct. at 2174 ; accord Marsh v. Austin-Fort Worth Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 2010See AMT, 504 F.3d at 1269 (holding, “[bjecause proof of patent infringement is necessary to show AMT would have prevailed in the prior litigation, patent infringement is a ‘necessary element’ of AMT’s malpractice claim and therefore apparently presents a substantial question of patent law conferring § 1338 jurisdiction”); Immunocept, 504 F.3d at 1285 (recognizing “a determination of patent infringement serves as the basis of § 1338 jurisdiction over related state law claims”); see also Christianson, 486 U.S. at 809 , 108 S.Ct. at 2174 ; accord Marsh v. Austin-Fort Worth Coca-Cola Bottling Co., | 3 | 3 |
IMMUNOCEPT, LLC v. Fulbright & Jaworski, LLPgreen2 sentences2010See AMT, 504 F.3d at 1269 (holding, "[b]ecause proof of patent infringement is necessary to show AMT would have prevailed in the prior litigation, patent infringement is a `necessary element' of AMT's malpractice claim and therefore apparently presents a substantial question of patent law conferring § 1338 jurisdiction"); Immunocept, 504 F.3d at 1285 (recognizing "a determination of patent infringement serves as the basis of § 1338 jurisdiction over related state law claims"); see also Christianson, 486 U.S. at 809 , 108 S.Ct. at 2174 ; accord Marsh v. Austin-Fort Worth Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 2010See AMT, 504 F.3d at 1269 (holding, “[bjecause proof of patent infringement is necessary to show AMT would have prevailed in the prior litigation, patent infringement is a ‘necessary element’ of AMT’s malpractice claim and therefore apparently presents a substantial question of patent law conferring § 1338 jurisdiction”); Immunocept, 504 F.3d at 1285 (recognizing “a determination of patent infringement serves as the basis of § 1338 jurisdiction over related state law claims”); see also Christianson, 486 U.S. at 809 , 108 S.Ct. at 2174 ; accord Marsh v. Austin-Fort Worth Coca-Cola Bottling Co., | 3 | 3 |
Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.green2 sentences2010See Christianson, 486 U.S. at 809 , 108 S.Ct. at 2174 . 2010See Christianson, 486 U.S. at 809 , 108 S.Ct. at 2174 . | 3 | 3 |
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottleygreen1 sentence2023Co. v. Mottley, 211 U.S. 149, 152 (1908). | 1 | 1 |
McKnight v. Dresser, Inc.green1 sentence2015The well-pleaded complaint rule requires that for a federal court to have "arising under jurisdiction, the plaintiff s federal law claims must appear on the face of the complaint." McKnight v. Dresser, Inc., 676 F.3d 426,430 (5th Cir. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Singh v. Duane Morris LLPgreen1 sentence2015A federal question exists if "the plaintiff s right to relief necessarily depends on resolution of a substantial question of federal law." Singh v. Duane Moruis LLP, 538 F.3d 334, 337-38 (5th Cir. 2008). s In her related Petition for Interdiction-filed in the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans in Louisiana-Petitioner Renee Benson admits that Mr. Benson is domiciled in Louisiana. | 1 | 1 |
Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.green2 sentences2010See, e.g., Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392 , 107 S.Ct. 2425, 2429 , 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987). 2010See, e.g., Caterpillar, Inc. v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386, 392 , 107 S.Ct. 2425, 2429 , 96 L.Ed.2d 318 (1987). | 1 | 1 |
Lockwood v. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hamptongreen1 sentence2009See Lockwood, 93 Cal. Rptr. 3d at 228–29 (explaining that trial court should have dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, not granted summary judgment, and rejecting defense’s argument that these two outcomes are equivalent). | 1 | 1 |
Stewart v. American Airlines, Inc.green2 sentences1994The court considered Stewart's motion to remand together with American’s motion to dismiss, reasoning that the applicability of an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule (which, if applicable, would have allowed the suit to remain in federal court) was governed by whether Stewart’s claims were, in fact, preempted. 776 F.Supp. at 1195, 1196 . . 1994(E) All authority of the Board under this chapter which is not terminated under [49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(a)] on or before January 1, 1985, and is not otherwise transferred under this subsection is transferred to the Department of Transportation. (2) Any authority transferred under paragraph (1) of this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 1985. 49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(b)(1)(E), (b)(2) (West Pamph.1994). [12] The court considered Stewart's motion to remand together with American's motion to dismiss, reasoning that the applicability of an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule (which, | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
cluster 752071
green
1 sentence2003A corollary to the well-pleaded complaint rule, the "artful-pleading doctrine,” prevents a plaintiff "from avoiding removal by framing in terms of state law a complaint the real nature of [which] is federal, regardless of plaintiff’s characterization, or by omitting to plead necessary federal questions in a complaint.” Marcus v. AT&T Corp., 138 F.3d 46 , 55 (2d Cir.1998). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
In Re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy International Airport on June 24, 1975
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Russell Wayne Anderson v. Usair, Inc
green
2 sentences1994Illinois Corp. Travel v. American Airlines, 889 F.2d 751 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 919 , 110 S.Ct. 1948 , 109 L.Ed.2d 311 (1990); Anderson v. USAir, 818 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.1987); Smith v. America West Airlines, No. H-91-1550, 1991 WL 296832 (S.D.Tex. 1994(E) All authority of the Board under this chapter which is not terminated under [49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(a)] on or before January 1, 1985, and is not otherwise transferred under this subsection is transferred to the Department of Transportation. (2) Any authority transferred under paragraph (1) of this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 1985. 49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(b)(1)(E), (b)(2) (West Pamph.1994). [12] The court considered Stewart's motion to remand together with American's motion to dismiss, reasoning that the applicability of an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule (which, | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Lawrence C. Bieneman v. City of Chicago
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Illinois Corporate Travel, Inc., Doing Business as McTravel Travel Services v. American Airlines, Inc., and Ivi Travel, Inc.
green
2 sentences1994Illinois Corp. Travel v. American Airlines, 889 F.2d 751 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 919 , 110 S.Ct. 1948 , 109 L.Ed.2d 311 (1990); Anderson v. USAir, 818 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.1987); Smith v. America West Airlines, No. H-91-1550, 1991 WL 296832 (S.D.Tex. 1994(E) All authority of the Board under this chapter which is not terminated under [49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(a)] on or before January 1, 1985, and is not otherwise transferred under this subsection is transferred to the Department of Transportation. (2) Any authority transferred under paragraph (1) of this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 1985. 49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(b)(1)(E), (b)(2) (West Pamph.1994). [12] The court considered Stewart's motion to remand together with American's motion to dismiss, reasoning that the applicability of an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule (which, | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Denise Lawson Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc.
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.
green
2 sentences1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit 1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In Re Air Crash Disaster at Stapleton International Airport, Denver, Colorado, on November 15, 1987
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In Re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux City, Iowa
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
green
2 sentences1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit 1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Jackson v. Johnstown/Consolidated Realty Trust
green
2 sentences1994Illinois Corp. Travel v. American Airlines, 889 F.2d 751 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 919 , 110 S.Ct. 1948 , 109 L.Ed.2d 311 (1990); Anderson v. USAir, 818 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.1987); Smith v. America West Airlines, No. H-91-1550, 1991 WL 296832 (S.D.Tex. 1994(E) All authority of the Board under this chapter which is not terminated under [49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(a)] on or before January 1, 1985, and is not otherwise transferred under this subsection is transferred to the Department of Transportation. (2) Any authority transferred under paragraph (1) of this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 1985. 49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(b)(1)(E), (b)(2) (West Pamph.1994). [12] The court considered Stewart's motion to remand together with American's motion to dismiss, reasoning that the applicability of an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule (which, | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Jackson v. Johnstown/Consolidated Realty Trust
green
2 sentences1994Illinois Corp. Travel v. American Airlines, 889 F.2d 751 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 919 , 110 S.Ct. 1948 , 109 L.Ed.2d 311 (1990); Anderson v. USAir, 818 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.1987); Smith v. America West Airlines, No. H-91-1550, 1991 WL 296832 (S.D.Tex. 1994(E) All authority of the Board under this chapter which is not terminated under [49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(a)] on or before January 1, 1985, and is not otherwise transferred under this subsection is transferred to the Department of Transportation. (2) Any authority transferred under paragraph (1) of this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 1985. 49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(b)(1)(E), (b)(2) (West Pamph.1994). [12] The court considered Stewart's motion to remand together with American's motion to dismiss, reasoning that the applicability of an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule (which, | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Howell v. Mauzy
green
2 sentences1994Illinois Corp. Travel v. American Airlines, 889 F.2d 751 (7th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 495 U.S. 919 , 110 S.Ct. 1948 , 109 L.Ed.2d 311 (1990); Anderson v. USAir, 818 F.2d 49 (D.C.Cir.1987); Smith v. America West Airlines, No. H-91-1550, 1991 WL 296832 (S.D.Tex. 1994(E) All authority of the Board under this chapter which is not terminated under [49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(a)] on or before January 1, 1985, and is not otherwise transferred under this subsection is transferred to the Department of Transportation. (2) Any authority transferred under paragraph (1) of this subsection shall take effect on January 1, 1985. 49 U.S.C.A.App. § 1551(b)(1)(E), (b)(2) (West Pamph.1994). [12] The court considered Stewart's motion to remand together with American's motion to dismiss, reasoning that the applicability of an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule (which, | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Wrenn v. State Industrial Insurance System
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Medical Malpractice Insurance Ass'n v. Superintendent of Insurance
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Roth v. United States
green
1 sentence1994August 30, 1991) (unpublished); Von Anhalt v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 735 F.Supp. 1030 (S.D.Fla.1990). [14] Silkwood v. Kerr McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984); Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, 426 U.S. 290 , 96 S.Ct. 1978 , 48 L.Ed.2d 643 (1976); Seidman v. American Airlines, Inc., 923 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.1991); Bieneman v. City of Chicago, 864 F.2d 463 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1080 , 109 S.Ct. 2099 and 2100, 104 L.Ed.2d 661 (1990); In re Air Crash Disaster at John F. Kennedy Int'l Airport, 635 F.2d 67 (2d Cir.1980); In re Air Crash Disaster at Sioux Cit | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor
green
2 sentences1989Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 67 , 107 S.Ct. 1542, 1548 , 95 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987), the United States Supreme Court created an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule in deciding that these defendants may remove. 1989Co. v. Taylor, 481 U.S. 58, 67 , 107 S.Ct. 1542, 1548 , 95 L.Ed.2d 55 (1987), the United States Supreme Court created an exception to the well-pleaded complaint rule in deciding that these defendants may remove. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.