analysis ends inquiry in Washington

2024State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996), overruled on other grounds by Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70 , 127 S. Ct. 649 , 166 L.

2023State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996).

2024State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996), overruled on other grounds by Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70 , 127 S. Ct. 649 , 166 L.

2023State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996).

2024State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996), overruled on other grounds by Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70 , 127 S. Ct. 649 , 166 L.

2024State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996), overruled on other grounds by Carey v. Musladin, 549 U.S. 70 , 127 S. Ct. 649 , 166 L.

2019The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to effective assistance of counse1.2° A defendant receives ineffective assistance if(1)the attorney's conduct falls below a minimum objective standard of reasonableness and (2) there is a reasonable probability the attorney's conduct affected the outcome of the case.21 Failing to satisfy either part of this analysis ends the inquiry.22 "There is a strong presumption that counsel has rendered adequate assistance and has made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment

2019The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to effective assistance of counse1.2° A defendant receives ineffective assistance if(1)the attorney's conduct falls below a minimum objective standard of reasonableness and (2) there is a reasonable probability the attorney's conduct affected the outcome of the case.21 Failing to satisfy either part of this analysis ends the inquiry.22 "There is a strong presumption that counsel has rendered adequate assistance and has made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment

2019The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees criminal defendants the right to effective assistance of counse1.2° A defendant receives ineffective assistance if(1)the attorney's conduct falls below a minimum objective standard of reasonableness and (2) there is a reasonable probability the attorney's conduct affected the outcome of the case.21 Failing to satisfy either part of this analysis ends the inquiry.22 "There is a strong presumption that counsel has rendered adequate assistance and has made all significant decisions in the exercise of reasonable professional judgment

2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 21 State v. Benn, 120 Wn.2d 631, 663 , 845 P.2d 289 (1993). 22 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996). 23 Benn, 120 Wn.2d at 665 . 24 Benn, 120 Wn.2d at 665 . -8 No. 78037-9-1/9 Failure To Stipulate to Prior Convictions To prove that Jefferson committed unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree, the State had to prove that he owned, possessed, or had in his control a firearm "[a]fter having previously been convicted . . . of any felony."25 "The existence of a constitutionally valid prior conviction is an essential element of the offense, one

2019Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 21 State v. Benn, 120 Wn.2d 631, 663 , 845 P.2d 289 (1993). 22 State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996). 23 Benn, 120 Wn.2d at 665 . 24 Benn, 120 Wn.2d at 665 . -8 No. 78037-9-1/9 Failure To Stipulate to Prior Convictions To prove that Jefferson committed unlawful possession of a firearm in the second degree, the State had to prove that he owned, possessed, or had in his control a firearm "[a]fter having previously been convicted . . . of any felony."25 "The existence of a constitutionally valid prior conviction is an essential element of the offense, one

2017State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996). ¶40 “Because the presumption runs in favor of effective representation, the defendant must show in the record the absence of legitimate strategic or tactical reasons supporting the challenged conduct by counsel.” State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 336 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). “[T]he presumption of adequate representation is not overcome if there is any ‘conceivable legitimate tactic’ that can explain counsel’s performance.” Hatfield, 191 Wn.

2017State v. Hendrickson, 129 Wn.2d 61, 78 , 917 P.2d 563 (1996). ¶40 “Because the presumption runs in favor of effective representation, the defendant must show in the record the absence of legitimate strategic or tactical reasons supporting the challenged conduct by counsel.” State v. McFarland, 127 Wn.2d 322, 336 , 899 P.2d 1251 (1995). “[T]he presumption of adequate representation is not overcome if there is any ‘conceivable legitimate tactic’ that can explain counsel’s performance.” Hatfield, 191 Wn.