Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Riss v. Angel
green
2 sentences2017Riss v. Angel, 131 Wn.2d 612,633 , 934 P.2d 669 (1997); Hawkins v. Diel, 166 Wn. 2013Riss v. Angel, 131 Wn.2d 612,633 , 934 P.2d 669 (1997); Hawkins v. Diel, 166 Wn. | 2 | 2013–2017 |
Riss v. Angel
green
2 sentences2017Riss v. Angel, 131 Wn.2d 612,633 , 934 P.2d 669 (1997); Hawkins v. Diel, 166 Wn. 2013Riss v. Angel, 131 Wn.2d 612,633 , 934 P.2d 669 (1997); Hawkins v. Diel, 166 Wn. | 2 | 2013–2017 |
Hawkins v. Diel
green
2 sentences2017Riss v. Angel, 131 Wn.2d 612,633 , 934 P.2d 669 (1997); Hawkins v. Diel, 166 Wn. 2013Riss v. Angel, 131 Wn.2d 612,633 , 934 P.2d 669 (1997); Hawkins v. Diel, 166 Wn. | 2 | 2013–2017 |
In re the Parentage of C.A.M.A.
green
2 sentences2005In re C.A.M.A., 120 Wn. 2005In re C.A.M.A., 120 Wash.App. at 216 , 84 P.3d 1253 . *415 ¶ 39 This argument is untenable. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Tradewell Group, Inc. v. Mavis
green
1 sentence2026App. 120, 130 , 857 P.2d 1053 (1993) (claims for tortious interference, unjust enrichment, and promissory estoppel did not arise out of an undelivered lease agreement that contained an attorney fees clause); CPL (Delaware) LLC v. Conley, 110 Wn. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
CPL (DELAWARE) LLC v. Conley
neutral
2 sentences2026App. 786, 796 , 40 P.3d 679 -4- No. 87270-2-I/5 (2002) (dispute over memorandum agreement that did not contain an attorney fees clause did not arise out of related purchase agreements that included an attorney fees clause). 2026App. 786, 796 , 40 P.3d 679 -4- No. 87270-2-I/5 (2002) (dispute over memorandum agreement that did not contain an attorney fees clause did not arise out of related purchase agreements that included an attorney fees clause). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
CPL, L.L.C. v. Conley
green
1 sentence2026App. 120, 130 , 857 P.2d 1053 (1993) (claims for tortious interference, unjust enrichment, and promissory estoppel did not arise out of an undelivered lease agreement that contained an attorney fees clause); CPL (Delaware) LLC v. Conley, 110 Wn. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Meresse v. Stelma
green
1 sentence2024App. 857, 867-68 , 999 P.2d 1267 (2000). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Meresse v. Stelma
green
1 sentence2024Finally, Skoglund contends that the Association was not entitled to attorney fees because, in filing this lawsuit, Skoglund “was not seeking enforcement of the [CCRs].” In support, Skoglund relies on an opinion of this court that is not only unpublished but also unpersuasive because there, the attorney fees clause applied only to actions “ ‘to enforce’ ” the CCRs,3 whereas here, the attorney fees clause more broadly applies to actions “involving enforcement.” Skoglund also relies on Meresse v. Stelma, but that case is readily distinguishable because the underlying litigation involved an associ | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Brown v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2021Brown, 109 Wn. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Ramirez
green
2 sentences2019Cruz Camacho raises other issues in a statement of additional grounds for appeal3 (SAG); these arguments fail. 1 LAWS OF 2018, ch. 269. 2 191 Wn.2d 732, 747-49 , 426 P.3d 714 (2018). 3 RAP 10.10. 2019Cruz Camacho raises other issues in a statement of additional grounds for appeal3 (SAG); these arguments fail. 1 LAWS OF 2018, ch. 269. 2 191 Wn.2d 732, 747-49 , 426 P.3d 714 (2018). 3 RAP 10.10. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In Re Parentage of CAMA
neutral
1 sentence2005In re C.A.M.A., 120 Wash.App. at 216 , 84 P.3d 1253 . *415 ¶ 39 This argument is untenable. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Agnew v. Lacey Co-Ply
green
2 sentences1995App. 283, 288-89 , 654 P.2d 712 (1982) (the *261 court looked to the contract's attorney fees clause); Moen v. State, 13 Wn. 1995App. 283, 288-89 , 654 P.2d 712 (1982) (the court looked to the contract’s attorney fees clause); Moen v. State, 13 Wn. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Moen v. State
neutral
2 sentences1995App. 283, 288-89 , 654 P.2d 712 (1982) (the *261 court looked to the contract's attorney fees clause); Moen v. State, 13 Wn. 1995App. 283, 288-89 , 654 P.2d 712 (1982) (the court looked to the contract’s attorney fees clause); Moen v. State, 13 Wn. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.