comment in court rule (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

comment in court rule in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2016–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Blazina green
wash · 2015
2 sentences

2025The court “should also look to the comment in court rule GR 34 for guidance.” Id. at 838-39 .

2018Among the other factors that the amici in Blazina suggested were "employment history, financial situation, and other factors." Amici Curiae Br. of Wash. Defender Ass'n, Blazina , No. 89028-5, at 7 (Wash. March 12, 2015). ¶ 12 Blazina went on to exhort courts to "look to the comment in court rule GR 34 for guidance," which "lists ways that a person may prove indigent status." 182 Wash.2d at 838 , 344 P.3d 680 .

92016–2025
State v. Lundy green
washctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2016However, "[n]either RCW 10.01.160 'nor the constitution requires a trial court to enter formal, specific findings regarding a defendant's ability to pay [discretionary] court costs."' State v. Lundy, 176 Wn.

12016–2016

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 10.01.160 (9) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 7.68.035 (6) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 43.43.7541 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.94A.760 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.20.021 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 36.18.020 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check