duration clause (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

duration clause in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Berg v. Hudesmangreen
wash · 1990 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Berg, 115 Wn.2d at 666-67 (the court may review extrinsic evidence to aid in the determination of the parties’ intent in an unambiguous contract); Tanner Elec., 128 Wn.2d at 674 (where only one reasonable inference can be drawn from the extrinsic evidence, interpretation of a contract is a question of law).

2006See Berg, 115 Wash.2d at 666-67 , 801 P.2d 222 (the court may review extrinsic evidence to aid in the determination of the parties' intent in an unambiguous contract); Tanner Electric, 128 Wash.2d at 674 , 911 P.2d 1301 (where only one reasonable *1259 inference can be drawn from the extrinsic evidence, interpretation of a contract is a question of law).

22
Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power & Lightgreen
wash · 1996 · cited in 2 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Berg, 115 Wn.2d at 666-67 (the court may review extrinsic evidence to aid in the determination of the parties’ intent in an unambiguous contract); Tanner Elec., 128 Wn.2d at 674 (where only one reasonable inference can be drawn from the extrinsic evidence, interpretation of a contract is a question of law).

2006See Berg, 115 Wash.2d at 666-67 , 801 P.2d 222 (the court may review extrinsic evidence to aid in the determination of the parties' intent in an unambiguous contract); Tanner Electric, 128 Wash.2d at 674 , 911 P.2d 1301 (where only one reasonable *1259 inference can be drawn from the extrinsic evidence, interpretation of a contract is a question of law).

12
Valmac Industries, Inc. v. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local Union No. 878green
ark · 1977 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
2 sentences

1987See also Valmac Indus, v. Chauffeurs, Local 878, 261 Ark. 253 , 547 S.W.2d 80 (1977).

1987See also Valmac Indus, v. Chauffeurs, Local 878, 261 Ark. 253 , 547 S.W.2d 80 (1977).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Pomeroy green
washctapp · 1977
2 sentences

1989State v. Pomeroy, 18 Wn.

1979App. 837, 842 , 573 P.2d 805 (1977), where the duration of the waiver under the rule is not specified, the waiver of the procedural right to speedy trial is effective only until the date of the trial contemporaneously or subsequently set by the court. *193 (Italics ours.) The record reveals that Burroughs explicitly waived application of the 60-day rule from June 6, 1977, to July 25, 1977 — a period of 49 days.

21979–1989
In re Pennington green
wash · 2000
1 sentence

2023For instance, in Pennington, our Supreme Court held that a relationship that, “while not continuous, spanned 12 years,” satisfied the duration requirement for evaluating whether the parties’ had been in a committed intimate relationship. 142 Wn.2d at 604 .

12023–2023
State v. Walker green
washctapp · 1994
1 sentence

2014Walker, 75 Wn.

12014–2014
State v. Burroughs green
washctapp · 1979
1 sentence

1988State v. Burroughs, 23 Wn.

11988–1988
Park v. Mighell green
wash · 1893
2 sentences

1977In Park v. Mighell, 7 Wash. 304, 305 , 35 P. 63 (1893), a waiver of the right to trial by jury was held to bind the parties upon *581 remand of the cause for retrial following a reversal on appeal.

1977In Park v. Mighell, 7 Wash. 304, 305 , 35 P. 63 (1893), a waiver of the right to trial by jury was held to bind the parties upon *581 remand of the cause for retrial following a reversal on appeal.

11977–1977

Where else courts name it

CA 12 (1954–2026) PA 11 (1955–2024) WA 9 (1977–2023) TX 7 (1997–2026) NM 5 (2009–2013) NY 5 (1981–2024) ID 5 (1986–2000) AZ 5 (1995–2023) IN 4 (1991–2025) OH 4 (1998–2022) MD 3 (1973–2013) MI 3 (2004–2012) DC 3 (1999–2020) MO 3 (1969–1994) IA 3 (2017–2020) TN 2 (2001–2002) CO 2 (2005–2006) ME 2 (1981–2016) RI 2 (2007–2022) DE 2 (1966–1966) LA 2 (2012–2017) MN 2 (1936–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check