9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1970–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pappas v. Hollowaygreen2 sentences1996The second sentence refers to what is often termed "core" or "opinion" work product, i.e., work product containing those "mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation." CR 26(b)(4); see Pappas, 114 Wash.2d at 210-11 , 787 P.2d 30 ; Lewis H. 1996The second sentence refers to what is often termed "core" or "opinion" work product, i.e., work product containing those "mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, or legal theories of an attorney or other representative of a party concerning the litigation." CR 26(b)(4); see Pappas, 114 Wash.2d at 210-11 , 787 P.2d 30 ; Lewis H. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Gerdts
green
2 sentences2007"Generally, when there is no objection on the record, we will not consider an alleged instructional error unless the appellant first demonstrates that the error is a `manifest error affecting a constitutional right.'" State v. Gerdts, 136 Wash.App. 720, 726 , 150 P.3d 627 (2007) (quoting RAP 2.5(a)(3)). 2007“Generally, when there is no objection on the record, we will not consider an alleged instructional error unless the appellant first demonstrates that the error is a ‘manifest error affecting a constitutional right.’ ” State v. Gerdts, 136 Wn. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Walden
green
1 sentence2016The first sentence of the instruction clearly states that it is a defense to the charges of attempted murder and/or first degree assault that first degree assault and/or attempted murder was "justifiable as defined in this instruction." Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Gerdts
green
1 sentence2007"Generally, when there is no objection on the record, we will not consider an alleged instructional error unless the appellant first demonstrates that the error is a `manifest error affecting a constitutional right.'" State v. Gerdts, 136 Wash.App. 720, 726 , 150 P.3d 627 (2007) (quoting RAP 2.5(a)(3)). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Brown v. Dahl
green
1 sentence1986Harris , at 447; Brown v. Dahl, 41 Wn. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Grisby
green
2 sentences1985The first sentence of this instruction is based on State v. Grisby, 97 Wn.2d 493, 501 , 647 P.2d 6 (1982), cert. denied sub nom. 1985The first sentence of this instruction is based on State v. Grisby, 97 Wn.2d 493, 501 , 647 P.2d 6 (1982), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Laswell v. Weinberger
green
1 sentence1985Frazier v. Washington, 459 U.S. 1211 , 75 L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Kell v. United States
green
1 sentence1985Frazier v. Washington, 459 U.S. 1211 , 75 L. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Thomas
green
2 sentences1976Unlike State v. Thomas, 63 Wn.2d 59 , 385 P.2d 532 (1963), where the propriety of the “lawless acts” language in the first sentence of this instruction was also raised, no evidence was introduced in the present case indicating the defendant had committed illegal or unlawful acts which might have occasioned the assault. 1976Unlike State v. Thomas, 63 Wn.2d 59 , 385 P.2d 532 (1963), where the propriety of the “lawless acts” language in the first sentence of this instruction was also raised, no evidence was introduced in the present case indicating the defendant had committed illegal or unlawful acts which might have occasioned the assault. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Dana
green
2 sentences1970However, State v. Dana, 73 Wn.2d 533 , 439 P.2d 403 (1968) convinces us that the presence of the first sentence of instruction No. 11 is fatal error. 1970However, State v. Dana, 73 Wn.2d 533 , 439 P.2d 403 (1968) convinces us that the presence of the first sentence of instruction No. 11 is fatal error. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.