first sentence instruction (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

first sentence instruction in Kansas

6 Kansas opinions name it 1 courts 1926–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Martisgreen
kan · 2004 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

11
Brown v. Browngreen
kan · 1975 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005See Brown, 218 Kan. at 37-38 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Hebert green
kan · 2004
2 sentences

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
State v. Donesay green
kan · 2001
2 sentences

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
Watson v. Luckett green
scotus · 2002
2 sentences

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst (Pabst II), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
Beckwith v. Communications Workers of America green
scotus · 2002
1 sentence

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
State v. Pabst green
kan · 2002
2 sentences

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
State v. Jamison green
kan · 2000
2 sentences

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
Smith v. Varner green
scotus · 2002
1 sentence

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
State v. Saleem green
kan · 1999
2 sentences

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
State v. Kleypas green
kan · 2001
2 sentences

2008This court held the first sentence of the instruction was sufficient to address the concern the jury might believe unanimity was required as to mitigating circumstances. 272 Kan. at 1079, 40 P.3d 139 .

2008However, we noted: "[A]ny instruction dealing with the consideration of mitigating circumstances should state (1) they need to be proved only to the satisfaction of the individual juror in the juror's sentencing decision and not beyond a reasonable doubt and (2) mitigating circumstances do not need to be found by all members of the jury in order to be considered in an individual juror's sentencing decision." 272 Kan. at 1078, 40 P.3d 139 .

12008–2008
State v. Wimbley green
kan · 2001
2 sentences

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

2008See State v. Martis, 277 Kan. 267, 298-302 , 83 P.3d 1216 (2004); State v. Hebert, 277 Kan. 61, 87-88 , 82 P.3d 470 (2004); State v. Pabst ( Pabst II ), 273 Kan. 658, 660 , 44 P.3d 1230 , cert. denied 537 U.S. 959 , 123 S.Ct. 384 , 154 L.Ed.2d 311 (2002); State v. Wimbley, 271 Kan. 843, 849-50 , 26 P.3d 657 (2001); State v. Donesay, 270 Kan. 720, 725 , 19 P.3d 779 (2001); State v. Jamison, 269 Kan. 564, 573 , 7 P.3d 1204 (2000); State v. Saleem, 267 Kan. 100, 105 , 977 P.2d 921 (1999).

12008–2008
State v. Fisher neutral
kan · 1935
2 sentences

2000The first sentence of instruction No. 7 defining property is not in dispute and was taken from K.S.A. 21-3110(16) which, for purposes of the criminal code states: “Property’ means anything of value, tangible or intangible, real or personal.” The second sentence is derived from K.S.A. 79-1301 which, for tax purposes, defines a dog as personal property, stating: “A dog shall be considered as personal property and have all the rights and privileges and be subject to like lawful restraints as other livestock.” This definition was also part of a previous version of K.S.A. 79-1301 and has been discu

2000The first sentence of instruction No. 7 defining property is not in dispute and was taken from K.S.A. 21-3110(16) which, for purposes of the criminal code states: “Property’ means anything of value, tangible or intangible, real or personal.” The second sentence is derived from K.S.A. 79-1301 which, for tax purposes, defines a dog as personal property, stating: “A dog shall be considered as personal property and have all the rights and privileges and be subject to like lawful restraints as other livestock.” This definition was also part of a previous version of K.S.A. 79-1301 and has been discu

12000–2000
State v. Fenske green
kan · 1936
2 sentences

2000The first sentence of instruction No. 7 defining property is not in dispute and was taken from K.S.A. 21-3110(16) which, for purposes of the criminal code states: “Property’ means anything of value, tangible or intangible, real or personal.” The second sentence is derived from K.S.A. 79-1301 which, for tax purposes, defines a dog as personal property, stating: “A dog shall be considered as personal property and have all the rights and privileges and be subject to like lawful restraints as other livestock.” This definition was also part of a previous version of K.S.A. 79-1301 and has been discu

2000The first sentence of instruction No. 7 defining property is not in dispute and was taken from K.S.A. 21-3110(16) which, for purposes of the criminal code states: “Property’ means anything of value, tangible or intangible, real or personal.” The second sentence is derived from K.S.A. 79-1301 which, for tax purposes, defines a dog as personal property, stating: “A dog shall be considered as personal property and have all the rights and privileges and be subject to like lawful restraints as other livestock.” This definition was also part of a previous version of K.S.A. 79-1301 and has been discu

12000–2000
Hendren ex rel. Hendren v. Snyder green
kan · 1936
2 sentences

1976A fact is not proven by circumstances which are merely consistent with its existence (Hendren v. Snyder, 143 Kan. 34, 41 , 53 P. 2d 472 ).

1976A fact is not proven by circumstances which are merely consistent with its existence (Hendren v. Snyder, 143 Kan. 34, 41 , 53 P. 2d 472 ).

11976–1976
State v. Moffitt green
kan · 1967
2 sentences

1972We so held in State v. Moffitt, 199 Kan. 514, 524 , 431 P. 2d 879 , where a similar instruction was given; however, we also held that the instruction did not prejudice the rights of the appellant.

1972We so held in State v. Moffitt, 199 Kan. 514, 524 , 431 P. 2d 879 , where a similar instruction was given; however, we also held that the instruction did not prejudice the rights of the appellant.

11972–1972
Intoxicating-Liquor Cases neutral
kan · 1881
1 sentence

1926(Intoxicating Liquor Cases, 25 Kan. 751 ; State v. Anderson, 121 Kan. 706, 249 Pac. 854 .) Since there was no issue in the case as to the right of a person to drink intoxicating liquors, there was no necessity of referring to that question in the instructions.

11926–1926
State v. Anderson neutral
kan · 1926
1 sentence

1926(Intoxicating Liquor Cases, 25 Kan. 751 ; State v. Anderson, 121 Kan. 706, 249 Pac. 854 .) Since there was no issue in the case as to the right of a person to drink intoxicating liquors, there was no necessity of referring to that question in the instructions.

11926–1926

Where else courts name it

CA 40 (1917–2025) IL 23 (1902–2026) IN 10 (1924–2019) TX 10 (1963–2010) WA 9 (1970–2016) MS 8 (1954–2013) FL 8 (1936–2025) MI 7 (1967–2017) MA 6 (1975–2024) KS 6 (1926–2008) NY 6 (1911–2025) IA 5 (1885–2022) MO 5 (1953–1987) OR 5 (1933–2020) MN 5 (1977–2014) NE 5 (1917–2006) VA 4 (1907–2025) GA 4 (1981–2025) WI 4 (1912–2008) PA 3 (1997–2021) OH 3 (2007–2017) MT 3 (1998–2014) WV 3 (1892–2012) NH 2 (1967–1994) ND 2 (1968–2015) AL 2 (1982–1994) AZ 2 (1983–1985) NC 2 (1958–2001) ID 2 (1929–1998) DE 2 (2020–2021) NM 2 (1979–1996)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check