Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Currygreen2 sentences2016The court stated, “[N]o defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful.” Curry, 118 Wn.2d at 918 . 2016In Curry, our Supreme Court held that the VPA statute did not violate due process because “no defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful.” 118 Wn.2d at 918 . | 2 | 9 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Lundy
green
2 sentences2016Lundy followed this precedent in the context of the DNA statute. 176 Wn. 2016Lundy followed this precedent in the context of the DNA statute. 176 Wn. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Gropper
green
2 sentences2002As to the ten year duration of supervision, see Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(2), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(4). [52] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(5) (emphasis added), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(7). [53] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(8), 7(2)(b), (2)(c), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.634(3)(c), (d); State v. Curry, 118 Wash.2d 911, 918 , 829 P.2d 166 (1992) ("no defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful"); State v. Gropper, 76 Wash.App. 882, 887 , 888 P.2d 1211 (1995); State v. Bower, 64 Wash.App. 227, 230 2002As to the ten year duration of supervision, see Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(2), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(4). [52] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(5) (emphasis added), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(7). [53] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(8), 7(2)(b), (2)(c), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.634(3)(c), (d); State v. Curry, 118 Wash.2d 911, 918 , 829 P.2d 166 (1992) ("no defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful"); State v. Gropper, 76 Wash.App. 882, 887 , 888 P.2d 1211 (1995); State v. Bower, 64 Wash.App. 227, 230 | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Bower
green
2 sentences2002As to the ten year duration of supervision, see Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(2), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(4). [52] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(5) (emphasis added), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(7). [53] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(8), 7(2)(b), (2)(c), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.634(3)(c), (d); State v. Curry, 118 Wash.2d 911, 918 , 829 P.2d 166 (1992) ("no defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful"); State v. Gropper, 76 Wash.App. 882, 887 , 888 P.2d 1211 (1995); State v. Bower, 64 Wash.App. 227, 230 2002As to the ten year duration of supervision, see Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(2), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(4). [52] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(5) (emphasis added), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(7). [53] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(8), 7(2)(b), (2)(c), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.634(3)(c), (d); State v. Curry, 118 Wash.2d 911, 918 , 829 P.2d 166 (1992) ("no defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful"); State v. Gropper, 76 Wash.App. 882, 887 , 888 P.2d 1211 (1995); State v. Bower, 64 Wash.App. 227, 230 | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Mathers
green
1 sentence2019Our Supreme Court held in Curry, “that the VPA statute did not violate due process because ‘no defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful.’” Mathers, 193 Wn. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Bearden v. Georgia
green
2 sentences2002As to the ten year duration of supervision, see Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(2), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(4). [52] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(5) (emphasis added), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(7). [53] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(8), 7(2)(b), (2)(c), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.634(3)(c), (d); State v. Curry, 118 Wash.2d 911, 918 , 829 P.2d 166 (1992) ("no defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful"); State v. Gropper, 76 Wash.App. 882, 887 , 888 P.2d 1211 (1995); State v. Bower, 64 Wash.App. 227, 230 2002As to the ten year duration of supervision, see Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(2), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(4). [52] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(5) (emphasis added), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.760(7). [53] Laws of 1989, ch. 252, § 3(8), 7(2)(b), (2)(c), currently codified as RCW 9.94A.634(3)(c), (d); State v. Curry, 118 Wash.2d 911, 918 , 829 P.2d 166 (1992) ("no defendant will be incarcerated for his or her inability to pay the penalty assessment unless the violation is willful"); State v. Gropper, 76 Wash.App. 882, 887 , 888 P.2d 1211 (1995); State v. Bower, 64 Wash.App. 227, 230 | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.