significance error (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

significance error in Washington

9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1967–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Doody v. Schrirogreen
ca9 · 2008 · cited in 3 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015See Doody I, 548 F.3d at 862-63 (suspect's Miranda waiver invalid because officers undermined the suspect's awareness that he was faced with a phase of the adversary system and "downplayed the relevance of the warnings[] and their application to the current questioning").

2015See Doody I, 548 F.3d at 862-63 (suspect’s Miranda waiver invalid because officers undermined the suspect’s awareness that he was faced with a phase of the adversary system and “downplayed the relevance of the warnings! ] and their application to the current questioning”).

33

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Yates v. Evatt green
scotus · 1991
2 sentences

2009"If, on the contrary, that assumption were incorrect, an examination of the entire record would not permit any sound conclusion to be drawn about the significance of the error to the jury in reaching the verdict." Yates, 500 U.S. at 405 , 111 S.Ct. 1884 .

2009“If, on the contrary, that assumption were incorrect, an examination of the entire record would not permit any sound conclusion to be drawn about the significance of the error to the jury in reaching the verdict.” Yates, 500 U.S. at 405 .

22009–2009
State v. Mayer green
wash · 2015
1 sentence

2025And unlike in Mayer, neither officer “emphasized that [Salavea] was not under arrest, thus downplaying the significance of the warnings and the adversarial nature of the encounter.” 184 Wn.2d at 565 .

12025–2025
Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru green
scotus · 2020
1 sentence

2021The “recognition of the significance of those factors . . . did not mean that they must be met— or even that they are necessarily important—in all other cases.” Id. at 2063 .

12021–2021
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board green
scotus · 1951
2 sentences

2017This is clearly the significance of the requirement... [in APA § 706] that courts consider the whole record.” Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat’l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S. Ct. 456 , 95 L.

2017This is clearly the significance of the requirement... [in APA § 706] that courts consider the whole record.” Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat’l Labor Relations Bd., 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S. Ct. 456 , 95 L.

12017–2017
Danielson v. Faymonville neutral
wash · 1967
1 sentence

1967NOTES [*] Reported in 435 P.2d 963 . [1] The significance of the clause "or has been guilty of any two or more of the acts specified in the Constitution as grounds for recall" is not clear, as the statute has already stated the three grounds of malfeasance, misfeasance, and violation of oath of office designated in the constitution. [2] "Each commissioner before he enters upon the duties of his office shall take and subscribe an oath or affirmation that he will faithfully and impartially discharge the duties of his office to the best of his ability...." RCW 54.12.100.

11967–1967

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.08.010 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9A.56.190 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MA 52 (1924–2025) LA 51 (1981–2024) CA 37 (1955–2026) NY 31 (1923–2020) TX 26 (1961–2019) IL 22 (1965–2026) FL 19 (1961–2019) PA 16 (1941–2023) CO 12 (1987–2026) VA 11 (1988–2025) CT 10 (1986–2021) OR 10 (1985–2023) WA 9 (1967–2025) WV 8 (1944–2017) NJ 7 (1990–2025) MI 7 (1914–2022) TN 6 (1988–2015) MD 6 (1963–2014) VT 6 (1984–2021) NM 5 (1968–2020) WI 5 (1979–2025) GA 5 (1992–2023) MO 5 (1937–2000) IN 5 (1984–2013) OK 5 (1999–2013) KS 5 (1967–1998) OH 4 (1991–2000) DE 4 (1994–2022) KY 4 (1948–2012) AL 3 (1999–2006) MT 3 (2007–2013) RI 3 (1993–2017) SC 3 (1992–2016) IA 3 (1965–2014) DC 2 (2003–2015) AZ 2 (1994–2021) NC 2 (1928–2001) SD 2 (1979–2025) MS 2 (1950–1995)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check