reconsideration hearing in Wisconsin

9 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2026 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Geegreen wisctapp · 2019 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026 2 sentences 2026See State v. Gee, 2019 WI App 31, ¶39 , 388 Wis. 2d 68 , 931 N.W.2d 287 (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are generally deemed forfeited.” (citation omitted)); see also State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶30 , 315 Wis. 2d 653 , 761 N.W.2d 612 (explaining that the forfeiture rule “gives both parties and the circuit court notice of the issue and a fair opportunity to address the objection” and prevents “sandbagging” by “failing to object to an error for strategic reasons and later claiming that the error is grounds for reversal”).6 ¶59 The Pettits’ only argument addressing the circuit c 2026See State v. Gee, 2019 WI App 31, ¶39 , 388 Wis. 2d 68 , 931 N.W.2d 287 (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are generally deemed forfeited.” (citation omitted)); see also State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶30 , 315 Wis. 2d 653 , 761 N.W.2d 612 (explaining that the forfeiture rule “gives both parties and the circuit court notice of the issue and a fair opportunity to address the objection” and prevents “sandbagging” by “failing to object to an error for strategic reasons and later claiming that the error is grounds for reversal”).6 ¶59 The Pettits’ only argument addressing the circuit c	1	1
State v. Ndinagreen wis · 2009 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026 2 sentences 2026See State v. Gee, 2019 WI App 31, ¶39 , 388 Wis. 2d 68 , 931 N.W.2d 287 (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are generally deemed forfeited.” (citation omitted)); see also State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶30 , 315 Wis. 2d 653 , 761 N.W.2d 612 (explaining that the forfeiture rule “gives both parties and the circuit court notice of the issue and a fair opportunity to address the objection” and prevents “sandbagging” by “failing to object to an error for strategic reasons and later claiming that the error is grounds for reversal”).6 ¶59 The Pettits’ only argument addressing the circuit c 2026See State v. Gee, 2019 WI App 31, ¶39 , 388 Wis. 2d 68 , 931 N.W.2d 287 (“[A]rguments raised for the first time on appeal are generally deemed forfeited.” (citation omitted)); see also State v. Ndina, 2009 WI 21, ¶30 , 315 Wis. 2d 653 , 761 N.W.2d 612 (explaining that the forfeiture rule “gives both parties and the circuit court notice of the issue and a fair opportunity to address the objection” and prevents “sandbagging” by “failing to object to an error for strategic reasons and later claiming that the error is grounds for reversal”).6 ¶59 The Pettits’ only argument addressing the circuit c	1	1
Gaethke v. Pozdergreen wisctapp · 2017 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023 1 sentence 2023See Gaethke, 376 Wis. 2d 448, ¶36 .4 III.	1	1
State v. Schaefergreen wis · 2008 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 2 sentences 2019See generally State v. Schaefer , 2008 WI 25 , ¶17, 308 Wis. 2d 279 , 746 N.W.2d 457 (noting standard of review for constitutional questions). 2019See generally State v. Schaefer , 2008 WI 25 , ¶17, 308 Wis. 2d 279 , 746 N.W.2d 457 (noting standard of review for constitutional questions).	1	1
Claflin v. Department of Natural Resourcesgreen wis · 1973 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015See Claflin v. DNR, 58 Wis. 2d 182 , 206 N.W.2d 392 (1973) (recognizing the DNR's authority to hold a reconsideration hearing); State Pub. 2015See Claflin v. DNR, 58 Wis. 2d 182 , 206 N.W.2d 392 (1973) (recognizing the DNR's authority to hold a reconsideration hearing); State Pub.	1	1
City of Oak Creek Ex Rel. Water & Sewer Utility Commission v. Public Service Commissiongreen wisctapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015Intervenor v. DNR, 177 Wis. 2d 666, 675-76 , 503 N.W.2d 305 (Ct. App. 1993), rev'd on other grounds by 184 Wis. 2d 407 , 515 N.W.2d 897 (1994) (recognizing that "an administrative agency has the power to reconsider its own decisions"); Goldberg, 115 Wis. 2d at 522 (permitting limited reconsideration ensures decisions are not based on mistake); City of Oak Creek, 292 Wis. 2d 119, ¶ 28 (recognizing the Public Service Commission's "power to rescind, change, or amend its previous decisions").	1	1
Goldberg v. City of Milwaukee Board of Zoning Appealsgreen wisctapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015Intervenor v. DNR, 177 Wis. 2d 666, 675-76 , 503 N.W.2d 305 (Ct. App. 1993), rev'd on other grounds by 184 Wis. 2d 407 , 515 N.W.2d 897 (1994) (recognizing that "an administrative agency has the power to reconsider its own decisions"); Goldberg, 115 Wis. 2d at 522 (permitting limited reconsideration ensures decisions are not based on mistake); City of Oak Creek, 292 Wis. 2d 119, ¶ 28 (recognizing the Public Service Commission's "power to rescind, change, or amend its previous decisions").	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

Case	Cited	Years
Miller v. Carroll (In re Paternity B.J.M.) green wisctapp · 2019 2 sentences 2020However, he denied the motion and claimed that he was impartial because he had already decided on his ruling prior to accepting her friend request. ¶4 The court of appeals reversed the circuit court's denial of the motion for reconsideration and remanded the case with directions that it proceed before a different circuit court judge.2 1 Judge Michael Bitney of the Barron County Circuit Court presided. 2 Miller v. Carroll, 2019 WI App 10 , 386 Wis. 2d 267 , 925 N.W.2d 580 . 2 No. 2017AP2132 ¶5 We conclude that the extreme facts of this case rebut the presumption of judicial impartiality and est 2020However, he denied the motion and claimed that he was impartial because he had already decided on his ruling prior to accepting her friend request. ¶4 The court of appeals reversed the circuit court's denial of the motion for reconsideration and remanded the case with directions that it proceed before a different circuit court judge.2 1 Judge Michael Bitney of the Barron County Circuit Court presided. 2 Miller v. Carroll, 2019 WI App 10 , 386 Wis. 2d 267 , 925 N.W.2d 580 . 2 No. 2017AP2132 ¶5 We conclude that the extreme facts of this case rebut the presumption of judicial impartiality and est	2	2020–2020
State v. Brian L. Halverson neutral wisctapp · 2019 1 sentence 2021State v. Halverson, 2019 WI App 66, ¶65 , 389 Wis. 2d 554 , 937 N.W.2d 74 .	1	2021–2021
State v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources neutral wis · 1994 2 sentences 2015Intervenor v. DNR, 177 Wis. 2d 666, 675-76 , 503 N.W.2d 305 (Ct. App. 1993), rev'd on other grounds by 184 Wis. 2d 407 , 515 N.W.2d 897 (1994) (recognizing that "an administrative agency has the power to reconsider its own decisions"); Goldberg, 115 Wis. 2d at 522 (permitting limited reconsideration ensures decisions are not based on mistake); City of Oak Creek, 292 Wis. 2d 119, ¶ 28 (recognizing the Public Service Commission's "power to rescind, change, or amend its previous decisions"). 2015Intervenor v. DNR, 177 Wis. 2d 666, 675-76 , 503 N.W.2d 305 (Ct. App. 1993), rev'd on other grounds by 184 Wis. 2d 407 , 515 N.W.2d 897 (1994) (recognizing that "an administrative agency has the power to reconsider its own decisions"); Goldberg, 115 Wis. 2d at 522 (permitting limited reconsideration ensures decisions are not based on mistake); City of Oak Creek, 292 Wis. 2d 119, ¶ 28 (recognizing the Public Service Commission's "power to rescind, change, or amend its previous decisions").	1	2015–2015
State Public Intervenor v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources green wisctapp · 1993 2 sentences 2015Intervenor v. DNR, 177 Wis. 2d 666, 675-76 , 503 N.W.2d 305 (Ct. App. 1993), rev'd on other grounds by 184 Wis. 2d 407 , 515 N.W.2d 897 (1994) (recognizing that "an administrative agency has the power to reconsider its own decisions"); Goldberg, 115 Wis. 2d at 522 (permitting limited reconsideration ensures decisions are not based on mistake); City of Oak Creek, 292 Wis. 2d 119, ¶ 28 (recognizing the Public Service Commission's "power to rescind, change, or amend its previous decisions"). 2015Intervenor v. DNR, 177 Wis. 2d 666, 675-76 , 503 N.W.2d 305 (Ct. App. 1993), rev'd on other grounds by 184 Wis. 2d 407 , 515 N.W.2d 897 (1994) (recognizing that "an administrative agency has the power to reconsider its own decisions"); Goldberg, 115 Wis. 2d at 522 (permitting limited reconsideration ensures decisions are not based on mistake); City of Oak Creek, 292 Wis. 2d 119, ¶ 28 (recognizing the Public Service Commission's "power to rescind, change, or amend its previous decisions").	1	2015–2015
Schweidler v. Caruso green wis · 1955 2 sentences 1963As late as Schweidler v. Caruso (1955), 269 Wis. 438 , 69 N. W. (2d) 611 , upon a reconsideration of the principle announced in Sommerfield we stated there was no compelling reason for changing the rule that a joint adventure must grow out of a financial or business enterprise and spring from contract. 1963As late as Schweidler v. Caruso (1955), 269 Wis. 438 , 69 N. W. (2d) 611 , upon a reconsideration of the principle announced in Sommerfield we stated there was no compelling reason for changing the rule that a joint adventure must grow out of a financial or business enterprise and spring from contract.	1	1963–1963
Fischbach v. Wanta neutral wis · 1933 2 sentences 1955This principle was approved in Fischbach v. Wanta (1933), 212 Wis. 638 , 250 N. W. 387 ; Hahn v. Smith (1934), 215 Wis. 277 , 254 N. W. 750 ; Cansoneri v. Heckert (1936), 223 Wis. 25 , 269 N. W. 716 ; and Brabazon v. Joannes Brothers Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 426 , 286 N. W. 21 . 1955This principle was approved in Fischbach v. Wanta (1933), 212 Wis. 638 , 250 N. W. 387 ; Hahn v. Smith (1934), 215 Wis. 277 , 254 N. W. 750 ; Cansoneri v. Heckert (1936), 223 Wis. 25 , 269 N. W. 716 ; and Brabazon v. Joannes Brothers Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 426 , 286 N. W. 21 .	1	1955–1955
Hahn v. Smith neutral wis · 1934 2 sentences 1955This principle was approved in Fischbach v. Wanta (1933), 212 Wis. 638 , 250 N. W. 387 ; Hahn v. Smith (1934), 215 Wis. 277 , 254 N. W. 750 ; Cansoneri v. Heckert (1936), 223 Wis. 25 , 269 N. W. 716 ; and Brabazon v. Joannes Brothers Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 426 , 286 N. W. 21 . 1955This principle was approved in Fischbach v. Wanta (1933), 212 Wis. 638 , 250 N. W. 387 ; Hahn v. Smith (1934), 215 Wis. 277 , 254 N. W. 750 ; Cansoneri v. Heckert (1936), 223 Wis. 25 , 269 N. W. 716 ; and Brabazon v. Joannes Brothers Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 426 , 286 N. W. 21 .	1	1955–1955
Canzoneri v. Heckert green wis · 1936 2 sentences 1955This principle was approved in Fischbach v. Wanta (1933), 212 Wis. 638 , 250 N. W. 387 ; Hahn v. Smith (1934), 215 Wis. 277 , 254 N. W. 750 ; Cansoneri v. Heckert (1936), 223 Wis. 25 , 269 N. W. 716 ; and Brabazon v. Joannes Brothers Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 426 , 286 N. W. 21 . 1955This principle was approved in Fischbach v. Wanta (1933), 212 Wis. 638 , 250 N. W. 387 ; Hahn v. Smith (1934), 215 Wis. 277 , 254 N. W. 750 ; Cansoneri v. Heckert (1936), 223 Wis. 25 , 269 N. W. 716 ; and Brabazon v. Joannes Brothers Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 426 , 286 N. W. 21 .	1	1955–1955
Brabazon v. Joannes Bros. green wis · 1939 2 sentences 1955This principle was approved in Fischbach v. Wanta (1933), 212 Wis. 638 , 250 N. W. 387 ; Hahn v. Smith (1934), 215 Wis. 277 , 254 N. W. 750 ; Cansoneri v. Heckert (1936), 223 Wis. 25 , 269 N. W. 716 ; and Brabazon v. Joannes Brothers Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 426 , 286 N. W. 21 . 1955This principle was approved in Fischbach v. Wanta (1933), 212 Wis. 638 , 250 N. W. 387 ; Hahn v. Smith (1934), 215 Wis. 277 , 254 N. W. 750 ; Cansoneri v. Heckert (1936), 223 Wis. 25 , 269 N. W. 716 ; and Brabazon v. Joannes Brothers Co. (1939), 231 Wis. 426 , 286 N. W. 21 .	1	1955–1955

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WI § Wis. Stat. § 767.481 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 16 (1957–2024) CA 11 (1955–2024) WI 9 (1955–2026) NJ 8 (1987–2026) OH 7 (2002–2024) IL 6 (1972–2024) NY 5 (1982–2025) SC 4 (2008–2020) CT 3 (2005–2021) HI 3 (2004–2024) ME 3 (2001–2007) OR 3 (1988–2001) MD 3 (1974–2013) NC 2 (1971–2006) KS 2 (1990–2018) WA 2 (1978–1978) NH 2 (1986–1989) MA 2 (1999–2008) DC 2 (1960–1994) TX 2 (1992–1999) VA 2 (2009–2009) MI 2 (2015–2016) MN 2 (1970–1979) WY 2 (1978–2009) CO 2 (1952–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check