Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Alaska opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2007 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alaska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc.green2 sentences2007See Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc., 560 P.2d 758, 763 (Alaska 1977) (''The doctrine of the law of the case prohibits the reconsideration of issues which have been adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case."). 2007Id. at 21-22 . [24] See Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc., 560 P.2d 758, 763 (Alaska 1977) ("The doctrine of the law of the case prohibits the reconsideration of issues which have been adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case."). | 7 | 7 |
Brandon v. Stategreen1 sentence2003See Smith, 24 P.3d at 1248 ("[T]he policy against reconsidering issues adjudicated in a pri- or appeal or issues 'directly involved with or necessarily inhering’ in a prior decision applies only if there has been 'a final judgment ... with respect to the issues at hand.’ ”) (citations omitted); Brandon v. State, 839 P.2d 400, 403-04 (Alaska App.1992) ("The doctrine of the law of the case prohibits the reconsideration of issues that this court has adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case.”). 64 . 516 U.S. 325 , 116 S.Ct. 848 , 133 L.Ed.2d 796 (1996). 65 . | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Clearygreen1 sentence2003See Smith, 24 P.3d at 1248 ("[T]he policy against reconsidering issues adjudicated in a pri- or appeal or issues 'directly involved with or necessarily inhering’ in a prior decision applies only if there has been 'a final judgment ... with respect to the issues at hand.’ ”) (citations omitted); Brandon v. State, 839 P.2d 400, 403-04 (Alaska App.1992) ("The doctrine of the law of the case prohibits the reconsideration of issues that this court has adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case.”). 64 . 516 U.S. 325 , 116 S.Ct. 848 , 133 L.Ed.2d 796 (1996). 65 . | 1 | 1 |
Loveless v. Stategreen1 sentence1985“The doctrine of the law of the case prohibits the reconsideration of issues which have been adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case.” Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc., 560 P.2d 758, 763 (Alaska 1977); accord Loveless v. State, 634 P.2d 941 , 942 n. 5 (Alaska 1981). | 1 | 1 |
Patrick v. Sedwickgreen1 sentence1977Patrick v. Sedwick, 413 P.2d 169, 173 (Alaska 1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alaska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vezey v. Green
green
1 sentence2007Id. at 21-22 . [24] See Wolff v. Arctic Bowl, Inc., 560 P.2d 758, 763 (Alaska 1977) ("The doctrine of the law of the case prohibits the reconsideration of issues which have been adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case."). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Fulton Corp. v. Faulkner
green
2 sentences2003See Smith, 24 P.3d at 1248 ("[T]he policy against reconsidering issues adjudicated in a pri- or appeal or issues 'directly involved with or necessarily inhering’ in a prior decision applies only if there has been 'a final judgment ... with respect to the issues at hand.’ ”) (citations omitted); Brandon v. State, 839 P.2d 400, 403-04 (Alaska App.1992) ("The doctrine of the law of the case prohibits the reconsideration of issues that this court has adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case.”). 64 . 516 U.S. 325 , 116 S.Ct. 848 , 133 L.Ed.2d 796 (1996). 65 . 2003See Smith, 24 P.3d at 1248 ("[T]he policy against reconsidering issues adjudicated in a pri- or appeal or issues 'directly involved with or necessarily inhering’ in a prior decision applies only if there has been 'a final judgment ... with respect to the issues at hand.’ ”) (citations omitted); Brandon v. State, 839 P.2d 400, 403-04 (Alaska App.1992) ("The doctrine of the law of the case prohibits the reconsideration of issues that this court has adjudicated in a previous appeal in the same case.”). 64 . 516 U.S. 325 , 116 S.Ct. 848 , 133 L.Ed.2d 796 (1996). 65 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.