five statutory factors (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

five statutory factors in Alabama

8 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
NDT v. Stategreen
alacrimapp · 1991 · cited in 8 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1993–2011
2 sentences

1994Rather, it is a balancing and weighing process wherein one statutory factor may outweigh the remaining five statutory factors.’ “N.D.T. v. State, 592 So.2d 647, 650 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).

1994Rather, it is a balancing and weighing process wherein one statutory factor may outweigh the remaining five statutory factors.’ “N.D.T. v. State, 592 So.2d 647, 650 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).

68

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Palmer v. State green
alacrimapp · 1986
1 sentence

1993Palmer v. State, 485 So.2d 1247 (Ala.Cr.App.1986). "[T]he weighing of the six statutory factors and other considerations in determining whether a juvenile should be transferred from the juvenile court to the circuit court for criminal prosecution as an adult does not involve `a mere tallying of the circumstances for the purpose of numerical comparison'.... *1291 Rather, it is a balancing and weighing process wherein one statutory factor may outweigh the remaining five statutory factors." N.D.T. v. State, 592 So.2d 647, 650 (Ala.Cr.

11993–1993

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AL § Ala. Code § 13A-6-2 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 33 (2000–2026) MO 9 (2002–2014) AL 8 (1993–2011) WV 7 (2013–2020) OR 6 (2005–2018) TX 3 (2012–2016) IN 2 (1986–1996) OH 2 (2002–2005) CA 2 (2023–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check