Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coley v. Walkergreen1 sentence1998In Coley v. Walker, 655 So.2d 1005, 1007 (Ala.Civ.App.1994), this court stated the following regarding a motion for a JNOV, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence: "A post-judgment motion for JNOV, like a motion for a directed verdict presented during trial, is a procedural device used to challenge the sufficiency of the nonmoving party's evidence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Trzcinski
green
2 sentences2018Further, in Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Trzcinski , 682 So.2d 17 (Ala. 1996), this Court held: " 'The motion for a J.N.O.V. [now referred to as a renewed motion for a JML] is a procedural device used to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdict. 2018Further, in Cessna Aircraft Co. v. Trzcinski , 682 So.2d 17 (Ala. 1996), this Court held: " 'The motion for a J.N.O.V. [now referred to as a renewed motion for a JML] is a procedural device used to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury's verdict. | 6 | 2005–2018 |
Alabama Power Co. v. Williams
green
1 sentence1994Alabama Power Co. v. Williams , 570 So.2d 589 , 591 (Ala. 1990). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.