8 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1987–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pickett v. Bowengreen2 sentences1998Accord, Pickett v. Bowen , 626 F. Supp. 81 , 84-85 (M.D.Ala. 1985), affirmed, 798 F.2d 1385 (11th Cir. 1986)." According to the appellant, the state failed to satisfy the "necessity" prong of the Roberts test. 1998Accord, Pickett v. Bowen , 626 F. Supp. 81 , 84-85 (M.D.Ala. 1985), affirmed, 798 F.2d 1385 (11th Cir. 1986)." According to the appellant, the state failed to satisfy the "necessity" prong of the Roberts test. | 1 | 2 |
IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.green1 sentence2026Corp., 602 So. 2d 344, 346 (Ala. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Hendricksgreen2 sentences2011Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 . ‘ “The iynchpin of the Crawford decision ... is its distinction between testimonial and nontesti-monial hearsay...."' United States v, Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100, 104-05 (C.A.A.F.2005) (quoting United States v. Hendricks, 395 F.3d 173, 179 (3rd Cir.2005)). 2011Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 . ‘ “The iynchpin of the Crawford decision ... is its distinction between testimonial and nontesti-monial hearsay...."' United States v, Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100, 104-05 (C.A.A.F.2005) (quoting United States v. Hendricks, 395 F.3d 173, 179 (3rd Cir.2005)). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Scheurergreen2 sentences2011Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 . ‘ “The iynchpin of the Crawford decision ... is its distinction between testimonial and nontesti-monial hearsay...."' United States v, Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100, 104-05 (C.A.A.F.2005) (quoting United States v. Hendricks, 395 F.3d 173, 179 (3rd Cir.2005)). 2011Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 . ‘ “The iynchpin of the Crawford decision ... is its distinction between testimonial and nontesti-monial hearsay...."' United States v, Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100, 104-05 (C.A.A.F.2005) (quoting United States v. Hendricks, 395 F.3d 173, 179 (3rd Cir.2005)). | 1 | 1 |
Valentine v. Wattersgreen1 sentence2011This Court has stated “that an exception to the general requirement that a plaintiff present expert testimony in support of a legal-malpractice claim occurs where a legal-service provider’s want of skill or lack of care is so apparent as to be understood by a layperson and requires only common knowledge and experience to understand it.” Valentine v. Watters, 896 So.2d 385, 394 (Ala.2004). | 1 | 1 |
Grantham v. Vanderzylgreen1 sentence2006In her brief submitted to this court, Roberts again argues that the trial court’s May 9, 2005, order was not final, citing Jones v. Jones, 869 So.2d 1120, 1123 (Ala.2003), for the proposition that “ ‘[a]n order is not final if it permits a party to return to court and prove more damages or if it leaves open the question of additional recovery.’ ” (Quoting Grantham v. Vanderzyl, 802 So.2d 1077, 1080 (Ala.2001)). | 1 | 1 |
Jones v. Jonesgreen1 sentence2006In her brief submitted to this court, Roberts again argues that the trial court’s May 9, 2005, order was not final, citing Jones v. Jones, 869 So.2d 1120, 1123 (Ala.2003), for the proposition that “ ‘[a]n order is not final if it permits a party to return to court and prove more damages or if it leaves open the question of additional recovery.’ ” (Quoting Grantham v. Vanderzyl, 802 So.2d 1077, 1080 (Ala.2001)). | 1 | 1 |
John Edward Pickett v. George Bowen, Warden Charles A. Graddick, Attorney Generalgreen2 sentences1998Accord, Pickett v. Bowen , 626 F. Supp. 81 , 84-85 (M.D.Ala. 1985), affirmed, 798 F.2d 1385 (11th Cir. 1986)." According to the appellant, the state failed to satisfy the "necessity" prong of the Roberts test. 1998Accord, Pickett v. Bowen , 626 F. Supp. 81 , 84-85 (M.D.Ala. 1985), affirmed, 798 F.2d 1385 (11th Cir. 1986)." According to the appellant, the state failed to satisfy the "necessity" prong of the Roberts test. | 1 | 1 |
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harold S. McCLINTOCK, Defendant-Appellantgreen2 sentences1991See United States v. McClintock , 748 F.2d at 1292 ; Pickett v. Bowen , 626 F. Supp. at 85 . 1991See United States v. McClintock , 748 F.2d at 1292 ; Pickett v. Bowen , 626 F. Supp. at 85 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washington
green
2 sentences2011Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 . ‘ “The iynchpin of the Crawford decision ... is its distinction between testimonial and nontesti-monial hearsay...."' United States v, Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100, 104-05 (C.A.A.F.2005) (quoting United States v. Hendricks, 395 F.3d 173, 179 (3rd Cir.2005)). 2011Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 . ‘ “The iynchpin of the Crawford decision ... is its distinction between testimonial and nontesti-monial hearsay...."' United States v, Scheurer, 62 M.J. 100, 104-05 (C.A.A.F.2005) (quoting United States v. Hendricks, 395 F.3d 173, 179 (3rd Cir.2005)). | 2 | 2004–2011 |
Michael A. Mayola v. State of Alabama
green
2 sentences1987All Judges concur. 1 In reviewing Roberts' claim that the court's order was erroneous as to 7 of the 13 disciplinaries, we consider the first ground of denial — the operation of laches — to be insufficient, for the prosecution did not meet the requirements of Mayola v. State of Alabama , 623 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981). 1987As stated in Mayola : "A petition for habeas corpus may be dismissed under the equitable doctrine of laches . . . if (1) the petitioner has delayed unreasonably in the filing of his petition, and (2) the state can demonstrate that it has suffered actual prejudice from the delay in its ability to respond to the grounds upon which habeas corpus is sought." 623 F.2d at 999 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Delgado v. Israel
green
1 sentence1987All Judges concur. 1 In reviewing Roberts' claim that the court's order was erroneous as to 7 of the 13 disciplinaries, we consider the first ground of denial — the operation of laches — to be insufficient, for the prosecution did not meet the requirements of Mayola v. State of Alabama , 623 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Reed v. Jago
green
1 sentence1987All Judges concur. 1 In reviewing Roberts' claim that the court's order was erroneous as to 7 of the 13 disciplinaries, we consider the first ground of denial — the operation of laches — to be insufficient, for the prosecution did not meet the requirements of Mayola v. State of Alabama , 623 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Lee v. United States
green
1 sentence1987All Judges concur. 1 In reviewing Roberts' claim that the court's order was erroneous as to 7 of the 13 disciplinaries, we consider the first ground of denial — the operation of laches — to be insufficient, for the prosecution did not meet the requirements of Mayola v. State of Alabama , 623 F.2d 992 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 913 , 101 S.Ct. 1986 , 68 L.Ed.2d 303 (1981). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.